The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16314, Cochranton, Pennsylvania is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.22 percent of the residents in 16314 has some form of health insurance. 38.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16314 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,260 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16314. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,083 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,313 health care providers accessible to residents in 16314, Cochranton, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16314, Cochranton, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 63 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 73 |
Hospital Score | 46 |
Travel Score | 48 |
16314 | Cochranton | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16314 and Primary Care Availability in Cochranton**
Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care, particularly concerning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management, within ZIP Code 16314 (Cochranton, Pennsylvania) demands a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial factors impacting COPD patient care. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'COPD Score' assessment, reflecting the overall landscape of care in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of any COPD Score assessment rests on the physician-to-patient ratio. Cochranton, being a relatively small community, likely faces challenges common to rural areas: a potential shortage of primary care physicians. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to specialized care, and increased burdens on existing healthcare providers. To calculate a preliminary score, one must first determine the total population within the ZIP Code. Publicly available data, such as U.S. Census Bureau information, would be utilized to estimate the population. Then, data from sources like the Pennsylvania Medical Society or the American Medical Association would be employed to identify the number of practicing primary care physicians within the specified area. This calculation provides a baseline understanding of the physician density. A low physician-to-patient ratio would negatively impact the COPD Score, indicating potential difficulties in accessing timely care.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care provided by the existing practices is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating several key indicators. These include the presence of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specialized COPD training, the availability of on-site pulmonary function testing (PFT) equipment, and the implementation of evidence-based COPD management protocols. Practices that actively participate in patient education programs, offer smoking cessation support, and demonstrate a commitment to regular patient follow-up would receive higher scores. Furthermore, examining patient satisfaction surveys and online reviews can provide valuable insights into the patient experience, reflecting the practice's commitment to patient-centered care. Practices demonstrating a holistic approach, integrating these elements, would significantly enhance the overall COPD Score.
Telemedicine adoption plays a critical role in bridging geographical barriers and improving access to care, especially in rural settings. The ability for patients to consult with physicians remotely, through video conferencing or phone calls, can facilitate regular check-ups, medication management, and symptom monitoring. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies, offering virtual appointments and remote patient monitoring, would receive a positive score adjustment. This is particularly relevant for COPD patients, who often require frequent monitoring and adjustments to their treatment plans. Telemedicine can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, minimizing travel burdens and potential exposure to illnesses.
The often-overlooked aspect of mental health integration is crucial for COPD patients. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental and emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that offer access to mental health services, either through on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, would receive a higher score. This includes the provision of resources for managing stress, coping with chronic illness, and addressing any underlying mental health conditions. The integration of mental health support within primary care is a critical component of holistic COPD management.
Furthermore, the availability of ancillary services, such as respiratory therapists and pulmonary rehabilitation programs, directly impacts the COPD Score. Practices that have established strong relationships with these specialists and offer access to these services would receive a higher score. Pulmonary rehabilitation, in particular, is a cornerstone of COPD management, improving lung function, exercise capacity, and overall quality of life. The presence of these supportive services demonstrates a commitment to comprehensive care.
To synthesize all these factors into a COPD Score, a weighted scoring system would be employed. Each factor – physician-to-patient ratio, quality of practice, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and ancillary services – would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted at 20%, while the quality of practice and telemedicine adoption might be weighted at 30% and 15%, respectively. The scores for each factor would then be combined to produce an overall COPD Score, providing a comprehensive assessment of the availability and quality of COPD care within ZIP Code 16314.
The final COPD Score would provide a valuable snapshot of the current state of care. It would highlight areas of strength, such as practices with advanced COPD management protocols, and identify areas for improvement, such as the need for increased physician recruitment or expanded telemedicine services. This analysis would also provide a basis for strategic planning, guiding efforts to improve access to care, enhance the quality of services, and ultimately improve the health outcomes of COPD patients in Cochranton.
For a more detailed and visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Cochranton, including the geographic distribution of physicians, the location of specialized services, and the availability of resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can transform this data into an interactive, user-friendly format, allowing for a deeper understanding of the healthcare ecosystem.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like