The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16613, Ashville, Pennsylvania is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.77 percent of the residents in 16613 has some form of health insurance. 39.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.47 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16613 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 287 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16613. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 418 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,221 health care providers accessible to residents in 16613, Ashville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16613, Ashville, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 86 |
---|---|
People Score | 69 |
Provider Score | 75 |
Hospital Score | 51 |
Travel Score | 55 |
16613 | Ashville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the landscape of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) care within ZIP code 16613, encompassing Ashville, Pennsylvania, requires a multi-faceted approach. We must assess the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs), considering their capacity to diagnose, manage, and refer COPD patients. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, evaluate telemedicine adoption, and examine the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements for effective COPD management.
The foundation of COPD care lies in accessible primary care. In Ashville, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and less frequent follow-up care. Conversely, a lower ratio generally suggests greater access to care, allowing for proactive management and early intervention. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and local healthcare networks must be analyzed to ascertain the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 16613. This data would then be compared against state and national averages to determine the relative accessibility of PCPs in Ashville.
Identifying standout practices involves scrutinizing several factors. Patient reviews, available through online platforms like Healthgrades and Vitals, provide valuable insights into patient experiences. These reviews often highlight physicians known for their empathy, communication skills, and ability to effectively manage chronic conditions. Furthermore, analyzing the practices’ adherence to established COPD treatment guidelines, as recommended by organizations like the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), is essential. Practices demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based medicine, including spirometry testing and regular pulmonary function assessments, are likely providing superior care.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in COPD management, particularly in rural areas like Ashville. Remote monitoring of patients' vital signs, virtual consultations, and medication management can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital readmissions. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual check-ups, medication refills, and educational resources, demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and proactive care. Assessing the availability and utilization of telemedicine services within 16613 is crucial. This includes determining the types of telemedicine platforms used, the frequency of virtual consultations, and patient satisfaction with these services.
The psychological impact of COPD cannot be overlooked. Living with a chronic respiratory condition can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, access to mental health resources is an integral component of comprehensive COPD care. This analysis must evaluate the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, within the Ashville area. It is important to assess whether PCPs routinely screen patients for mental health concerns and whether they have established referral pathways to mental health services. The integration of mental health support into COPD care is a key indicator of a patient-centered approach.
Further investigation into the specific practices within 16613 is needed. This includes identifying practices that have specialized COPD clinics or dedicated respiratory therapists. These specialized resources can provide patients with targeted education, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and personalized care plans. The presence of such resources indicates a commitment to comprehensive COPD management. The level of collaboration between PCPs and pulmonologists is also important. Efficient referral processes and clear communication between specialists contribute to better patient outcomes.
The utilization of electronic health records (EHRs) is another factor to consider. EHRs facilitate the sharing of patient information between healthcare providers, improving care coordination and reducing the risk of medical errors. Practices that have adopted comprehensive EHR systems are better equipped to manage complex conditions like COPD. The analysis should assess the interoperability of EHR systems within the Ashville healthcare network, ensuring seamless information exchange between PCPs, specialists, and other healthcare providers.
The availability of patient education materials and support groups is also crucial. Patients with COPD need to understand their condition, learn how to manage their symptoms, and adhere to their treatment plans. Practices that provide educational resources, such as brochures, online materials, and access to support groups, empower patients to take an active role in their care. The analysis should assess the availability and accessibility of these resources within 16613.
Finally, the analysis must consider the socioeconomic factors that can influence COPD care. Factors such as income, insurance coverage, and access to transportation can affect patients' ability to access healthcare services. The analysis should assess the prevalence of these factors within the Ashville community and identify any potential barriers to care. Addressing these barriers is essential to ensuring equitable access to high-quality COPD management.
In conclusion, a comprehensive COPD Score analysis for Ashville, ZIP code 16613, requires a detailed examination of physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, specialized clinics, EHR utilization, patient education, and socioeconomic factors. This analysis provides a snapshot of the current landscape of COPD care in Ashville.
For a dynamic, visual representation of this data, including physician locations, practice profiles, and resource availability, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps allow you to visualize complex healthcare data, identify areas of need, and make informed decisions about improving COPD care in your community. Visit CartoChrome today to see how data visualization can transform your understanding of healthcare access.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like