16670, Queen, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16670, Queen, Pennsylvania is 61 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.75 percent of the residents in 16670 has some form of health insurance. 50.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.13 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16670 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 17 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16670. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 16 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 864 health care providers accessible to residents in 16670, Queen, Pennsylvania.

This analysis assesses the landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care within ZIP Code 16670, a region that, for the purposes of this exercise, is assumed to be within the broader area of Queen. It focuses on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. This information is crucial for patients managing COPD, as access to quality care significantly impacts their quality of life.

The foundation of effective COPD management rests on accessible primary care. Queen's overall primary care availability is a key factor. We must consider the density of primary care physicians (PCPs) per capita within the region. A higher ratio indicates potentially easier access to appointments, preventive care, and ongoing management. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests possible challenges in securing timely consultations, which is critical for COPD patients experiencing exacerbations.

Within ZIP Code 16670 specifically, a more granular analysis is necessary. We need to identify the number of PCPs actively practicing in the area. This includes assessing the types of practices they operate: solo practices, group practices, or affiliations with larger healthcare systems. The size and structure of these practices influence their capacity to accommodate patients and offer comprehensive services.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a vital metric. Determining the number of residents within ZIP Code 16670 and comparing it to the number of available PCPs will provide a preliminary understanding of access. This ratio, however, needs refinement. Factors such as the age distribution of the population, the prevalence of chronic conditions like COPD, and the geographic distribution of patients within the ZIP Code all impact the true accessibility of care.

Identifying standout practices in the area is equally important. These practices often demonstrate excellence in COPD management through various means. This includes the use of evidence-based guidelines, patient education programs, respiratory therapy services, and robust care coordination. These practices might also excel in patient satisfaction scores, reflecting a commitment to providing high-quality, patient-centered care.

Telemedicine adoption is a critical aspect of modern healthcare, especially for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, facilitating regular check-ups, medication management, and symptom monitoring. Assessing the level of telemedicine integration within practices in ZIP Code 16670 is essential. Are physicians offering virtual consultations? Do they utilize remote monitoring devices to track patient progress? The availability of telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas.

The integration of mental health resources into COPD care is a crucial, often overlooked, element. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. Evaluating the availability of these resources within the practices in ZIP Code 16670 is therefore a crucial aspect of our analysis.

To assess these factors, we would need to delve into several data sources. These include publicly available physician directories, insurance provider networks, and patient reviews. We would also need to conduct direct outreach to practices in the area to gather information on their services, staffing, and telemedicine capabilities.

The analysis should also consider the presence of pulmonary specialists within the region. While PCPs provide the foundation of care, access to pulmonologists is essential for patients with more complex COPD cases. Evaluating the availability of these specialists and their proximity to PCPs in ZIP Code 16670 is vital for ensuring coordinated care.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. These programs provide patients with education, exercise training, and support to improve their lung function and quality of life. The presence of these programs within the area is a strong indicator of a commitment to comprehensive COPD care.

The analysis must also consider the local hospital systems and their involvement in COPD care. Do they have dedicated respiratory therapy departments? Do they offer specialized COPD clinics or programs? The involvement of local hospitals is a significant factor in providing acute care and support to patients experiencing exacerbations.

Finally, the analysis should consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on COPD care within ZIP Code 16670. Factors such as income, education, and access to transportation can significantly influence a patient's ability to access care. Understanding these factors is crucial for identifying potential disparities in care and developing strategies to address them.

In conclusion, a comprehensive COPD Score analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 16670, within the context of Queen, requires a multi-faceted approach. It necessitates a detailed assessment of primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. By gathering and analyzing this data, we can gain a clear understanding of the current landscape of COPD care in the area and identify areas for improvement.

For a visual representation of this data, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to care indicators, explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps.