The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16749, Smethport, Pennsylvania is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.95 percent of the residents in 16749 has some form of health insurance. 42.64 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.74 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16749 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 966 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16749. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 812 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 309 health care providers accessible to residents in 16749, Smethport, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16749, Smethport, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 11 |
---|---|
People Score | 46 |
Provider Score | 23 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 21 |
16749 | Smethport | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Smethport, PA (ZIP Code 16749)
Analyzing the landscape of COPD care within Smethport, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16749), necessitates a multifaceted approach. This analysis, a "COPD Score" assessment, examines the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) and associated resources, crucial elements in managing this chronic respiratory disease. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare infrastructure supporting COPD patients within this specific geographic area.
The primary challenge in Smethport, as with many rural communities, is physician availability. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While precise, up-to-the-minute figures are difficult to obtain publicly, the general trend in rural Pennsylvania suggests a shortage of PCPs. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses and treatment for COPD. The impact is particularly pronounced for individuals with limited mobility or transportation options, further exacerbating healthcare disparities.
Furthermore, the specific demographics of Smethport must be considered. An older population, a common characteristic of rural areas, often correlates with a higher prevalence of COPD. This demographic reality underscores the urgency of ensuring adequate healthcare resources tailored to the needs of this population. A robust primary care system is the cornerstone of effective COPD management, facilitating early intervention, regular monitoring, and patient education.
Identifying standout practices within the Smethport area is essential. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive COPD care often exhibit specific characteristics. These might include a dedicated respiratory therapist on staff, readily available pulmonary function testing, and a well-defined system for coordinating care with pulmonologists and other specialists. Practices that actively participate in chronic disease management programs, such as those offered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), are also likely to provide a higher standard of care.
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant opportunity to improve access to care in Smethport. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving adherence to treatment plans. This is especially valuable for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education. The success of telemedicine, however, depends on several factors, including reliable internet access, patient digital literacy, and physician willingness to embrace this technology.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical aspect of COPD care. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its impact on breathing and physical activity, can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services into their COPD management programs demonstrate a holistic approach to patient well-being. This might involve on-site therapists, referrals to mental health specialists, or support groups tailored to individuals with COPD.
The availability of these resources is crucial. The COPD Score would reflect the presence or absence of these elements. A high score would indicate a robust primary care system with readily accessible specialists, mental health support, and telemedicine options. A low score would highlight significant gaps in care, potentially necessitating interventions to improve access and quality.
The analysis would consider the following factors: the number of PCPs per capita, the average wait time for appointments, the availability of pulmonary function testing, the presence of respiratory therapists, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health services, and the degree of patient education provided.
The COPD Score for Smethport, PA (16749) would be derived from a weighted average of these factors. The weighting would reflect the relative importance of each factor in influencing patient outcomes. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and access to specialists would likely carry a higher weight than the availability of support groups.
This score, presented as a numerical value or a descriptive rating (e.g., "Excellent," "Good," "Fair," "Poor"), would provide a clear and concise assessment of the COPD care landscape in Smethport. It would serve as a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
The score's purpose is not just to provide a snapshot of the current situation. It is also intended to drive improvement. By identifying areas of strength and weakness, the score can inform targeted interventions to enhance COPD care. This might include initiatives to recruit and retain PCPs, expand telemedicine services, or increase access to mental health support.
The analysis would also consider the presence of community resources, such as support groups, educational programs, and exercise classes specifically designed for individuals with COPD. These resources play a vital role in empowering patients to manage their condition effectively and improve their quality of life.
The COPD Score, therefore, would be more than just a number. It would be a reflection of the community's commitment to providing high-quality, accessible care for individuals living with COPD. It would be a call to action, urging stakeholders to collaborate and innovate to meet the unique healthcare needs of this population.
To visualize and further explore the healthcare landscape of Smethport, and to gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing the COPD Score, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like