COPD Score

16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania is 76 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.06 percent of the residents in 16829 has some form of health insurance. 45.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16829 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 212 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16829. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 165 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,421 health care providers accessible to residents in 16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania

COPD Score 86
People Score 77
Provider Score 76
Hospital Score 73
Travel Score 25

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

16829 Clarence Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16829 and Primary Care Availability in Clarence

Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care, particularly concerning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management, within ZIP code 16829 (State College, PA) and the broader Clarence, PA area necessitates a nuanced understanding of several factors. This analysis aims to provide a "COPD Score" assessment, evaluating key aspects of care delivery relevant to COPD patients. This score isn't a numerical value but a comprehensive evaluation based on available data and contextual understanding.

**Physician-to-Patient Ratios and Access to Care:**

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of access. In 16829, home to Penn State University and a relatively affluent population, the overall physician-to-patient ratio might appear favorable compared to rural areas. However, this metric can be misleading. The presence of a large university population skews the data, potentially inflating the perceived availability. Focusing specifically on primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists, the specialists crucial for COPD management, reveals a more accurate picture. The concentration of specialists, and the ease of access to them, is more relevant.

Clarence, being a smaller, more rural community, likely faces greater challenges. The distance to specialists in State College, the primary hub for healthcare in the region, becomes a significant barrier. Transportation limitations, especially for individuals with COPD who experience breathing difficulties, further exacerbate this issue. The COPD score for Clarence will be lower than that of 16829, primarily due to reduced access to specialists.

**Standout Practices and COPD-Specific Care:**

Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several criteria. These include the presence of board-certified pulmonologists, the availability of specialized respiratory therapists, and the implementation of comprehensive COPD management programs. Practices that proactively offer pulmonary rehabilitation, a cornerstone of COPD treatment, score higher. Programs that incorporate patient education, smoking cessation support, and regular monitoring of lung function are also crucial.

In 16829, practices affiliated with larger healthcare systems, such as Mount Nittany Health, are likely to have more resources and specialized expertise. These systems often invest in advanced diagnostic equipment and offer a wider range of services. Identifying specific practices with a demonstrated commitment to COPD care, perhaps through patient testimonials or published research, is essential. In Clarence, the focus shifts to identifying practices that have established referral networks with specialists in State College. The strength and efficiency of these networks directly impact the quality of care.

**Telemedicine Adoption and Its Impact:**

Telemedicine holds significant potential for improving COPD care, particularly in rural areas like Clarence. Remote monitoring of vital signs, virtual consultations with pulmonologists, and access to educational resources can enhance patient management and reduce the need for frequent in-person visits. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering these services to their COPD patients, receive a higher score.

The adoption rate of telemedicine in 16829 might be higher due to better internet infrastructure and a more tech-savvy population. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine depends on patient access to technology and their ability to use it. Practices must provide adequate training and support to ensure all patients, regardless of their technological proficiency, can benefit. In Clarence, the availability of reliable internet access is a major factor. Practices that actively work to overcome these technological barriers, perhaps through partnerships with local organizations, demonstrate a commitment to improving patient care.

**Mental Health Resources and Integrated Care:**

COPD significantly impacts mental health. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with breathing difficulties and limitations on physical activity, can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services into their COPD care programs receive a higher score. This includes offering access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups.

In 16829, the presence of a university with a strong psychology department and a network of mental health professionals could provide greater access to these resources. Practices should actively screen patients for mental health issues and have established referral pathways. In Clarence, the availability of mental health services might be more limited. Practices that collaborate with community mental health providers or utilize telehealth to provide access to mental health support demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The ability to integrate mental health support into the COPD care plan is crucial for a higher COPD score.

**Smoking Cessation Programs and Prevention:**

Smoking is the primary cause of COPD. Practices that offer comprehensive smoking cessation programs, including counseling, medication, and support groups, are essential. Prevention efforts, such as educating patients about the risks of smoking and promoting smoke-free environments, also contribute to a higher score.

In both 16829 and Clarence, the effectiveness of smoking cessation programs depends on their accessibility, affordability, and the willingness of patients to participate. Practices should tailor their programs to the specific needs of their patient populations. The integration of smoking cessation into the overall COPD care plan is a key component of a high COPD score.

**Overall COPD Score Considerations:**

The "COPD Score" for doctors in 16829 will be higher than for those in Clarence. This is primarily due to greater access to specialists, a wider range of healthcare resources, and potentially higher rates of telemedicine adoption. However, even within 16829, significant variations will exist between practices. The score reflects the complex interplay of factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialized services, the integration of mental health support, and the implementation of smoking cessation programs.

In Clarence, the challenges are greater. The COPD score will be lower due to limited access to specialists, potential barriers to telemedicine adoption, and fewer readily available resources. The focus should be on identifying practices that actively work to overcome these challenges through collaboration, innovative care models, and a commitment to patient-centered care.

**Conclusion and Call to Action:**

Understanding the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 16829 and the surrounding areas requires detailed spatial analysis. To visualize the distribution of physicians, primary care availability, and the locations of specialized resources, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer powerful tools for analyzing geographic data, identifying areas of need, and visualizing access to care. Explore the possibilities of CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions about COPD care in the region.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania

You may also like

16874, Snow Shoe, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 2.52 Miles

Total Population:

16859, Moshannon, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 4.73 Miles

Total Population:

16845, Karthaus, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 6.36 Miles

Total Population:

16834, Drifting, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 9.49 Miles

Total Population:

16871, Pottersdale, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 10.03 Miles

Total Population:

16839, Grassflat, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 10.41 Miles

Total Population:

16835, Fleming, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 11.28 Miles

Total Population:

16853, Milesburg, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 11.45 Miles

Total Population:

16849, Lanse, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 16829: 11.64 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 16829, Clarence, Pennsylvania