The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16877, Warriors Mark, Pennsylvania is 70 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.37 percent of the residents in 16877 has some form of health insurance. 37.13 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.74 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16877 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 360 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16877. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 378 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 724 health care providers accessible to residents in 16877, Warriors Mark, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16877, Warriors Mark, Pennsylvania
| COPD Score | 92 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 67 |
| Provider Score | 70 |
| Hospital Score | 68 |
| Travel Score | 62 |
| 16877 | Warriors Mark | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in 16877 and Primary Care in Warriors Mark
This analysis evaluates the availability and quality of primary care services, specifically focusing on their capacity to address Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) within the ZIP code 16877, encompassing the Warriors Mark area. The goal is to provide a COPD Score assessment, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial elements in effectively managing this chronic respiratory condition.
Warriors Mark, a rural community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. Limited access to specialists, geographic isolation, and an aging population contribute to the complexities of managing COPD. Effective primary care is, therefore, paramount. The COPD Score, in this context, is not a single number but a holistic evaluation of the healthcare ecosystem's ability to support COPD patients.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care physicians, can significantly impact access to timely diagnoses, regular check-ups, and ongoing management of COPD. In a rural area like Warriors Mark, this is often exacerbated by the tendency of younger doctors to seek opportunities in urban areas. The analysis needs to determine the number of active primary care physicians within the ZIP code, compare this to the estimated population, and assess the impact of any specialist availability (e.g., pulmonologists) on patient access. Are there any physician shortages? Is there a reliance on traveling specialists?
Standout practices within the 16877 ZIP code deserve specific attention. Are there any primary care clinics known for their expertise in respiratory illnesses? Do they have dedicated programs or resources for COPD patients? This could include specialized nurses, respiratory therapists, or patient education materials. Identifying these practices and their specific strengths is crucial for understanding the overall quality of COPD care available. The analysis should examine their patient reviews, accreditation, and any affiliations with larger healthcare systems or hospitals. Are these practices accepting new patients, and if so, how long is the wait time for an appointment?
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine offers significant advantages for COPD patients, particularly in rural areas. It can reduce travel time, improve access to specialists, and facilitate remote monitoring of symptoms. The analysis should determine the extent to which primary care practices in 16877 utilize telemedicine for COPD management. Do they offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, or online educational resources? The ease of access to these services is a key determinant of the COPD Score. Does telemedicine bridge the gap created by geographical limitations?
The integration of mental health resources is essential for COPD management. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The analysis must assess the availability of mental health services within primary care practices in 16877. Are there on-site therapists or counselors? Do practices have established referral pathways to mental health specialists? The ability to address the psychological aspects of COPD is a crucial component of comprehensive care and directly impacts the COPD Score. Is there a focus on patient support groups?
The availability of ancillary services, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs and smoking cessation support, also contributes to the overall COPD Score. These services are essential for improving lung function, managing symptoms, and preventing exacerbations. The analysis needs to determine whether these services are readily accessible within the 16877 ZIP code or if patients must travel to access them. How well-integrated are these services with primary care practices?
The analysis will also consider the presence of any specific programs or initiatives aimed at improving COPD care within the community. This could include community outreach programs, educational campaigns, or collaborations between primary care practices and local organizations. Are there any grants or funding opportunities available to support COPD care in the area? These initiatives can significantly improve the COPD Score by raising awareness, improving access to care, and empowering patients to manage their condition effectively.
The overall COPD Score for doctors in 16877 and primary care availability in Warriors Mark would be a composite score based on these factors. A high score would indicate a robust healthcare system with ample access to primary care physicians, telemedicine capabilities, integrated mental health resources, and readily available ancillary services. A low score would reflect the opposite, highlighting potential challenges in accessing quality COPD care. The score would be a relative measure, providing a snapshot of the current state of care and identifying areas for improvement. The analysis must emphasize the importance of ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure that the healthcare system continues to meet the needs of COPD patients in the Warriors Mark area.
The analysis should not only assess the current state of affairs but also suggest potential improvements. This could include recommendations for increasing physician recruitment, expanding telemedicine services, integrating mental health resources, and promoting community awareness programs. The goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment that can inform decision-making and drive positive change in the delivery of COPD care. The success of this analysis hinges on the ability to gather accurate data, analyze it objectively, and present the findings in a clear and concise manner.
The final COPD Score should be a dynamic measure, reflecting the evolving healthcare landscape. It should be updated regularly to track progress and identify emerging challenges. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of life for COPD patients in Warriors Mark by ensuring they have access to the best possible care. The analysis serves as a critical tool for achieving this goal.
To further explore the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, physician locations, and patient access within the 16877 ZIP code, we encourage you to explore the advanced mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually represent the data discussed in this analysis, allowing you to identify areas with limited access to care and visualize potential solutions.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like