The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 17059, Mifflintown, Pennsylvania is 25 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 85.54 percent of the residents in 17059 has some form of health insurance. 35.07 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17059 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,722 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17059. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,482 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,376 health care providers accessible to residents in 17059, Mifflintown, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17059, Mifflintown, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 22 |
---|---|
People Score | 33 |
Provider Score | 25 |
Hospital Score | 52 |
Travel Score | 40 |
17059 | Mifflintown | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17059 and Primary Care Availability in Mifflintown
Analyzing the availability and quality of care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Mifflintown, Pennsylvania, and the surrounding ZIP code 17059 requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into the physician landscape, focusing on primary care, specialist access, telemedicine capabilities, and the availability of mental health resources, all critical components in managing this chronic respiratory illness. The ultimate goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare ecosystem's capacity to serve COPD patients.
The foundation of effective COPD management rests on accessible primary care. In Mifflintown, evaluating primary care availability necessitates examining the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised care. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) can provide insights into this ratio, comparing it to regional and national averages. Any significant deviation from the norm warrants further investigation.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This includes the proactive screening of at-risk individuals, timely diagnosis, and the implementation of evidence-based treatment plans. Assessing the adoption of standardized COPD management protocols within primary care practices is crucial. This involves evaluating the use of spirometry for diagnosis, the prescription of appropriate medications, and the provision of patient education regarding self-management strategies. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), often demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality care.
Specialist access is another critical factor. COPD often necessitates the involvement of pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and potentially cardiologists. The geographical proximity of these specialists to Mifflintown residents is a key determinant of care accessibility. Analyzing the travel time to specialists in the region, considering both distance and traffic patterns, provides a practical assessment of specialist access. Furthermore, understanding the referral pathways between primary care physicians and specialists is essential. Seamless communication and collaboration between these providers are vital for coordinated care.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in managing chronic conditions like COPD, especially in rural areas. Examining the adoption of telemedicine services by primary care practices and specialists in the 17059 ZIP code is important. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and the use of telehealth platforms for patient education. Telemedicine can improve access to care, reduce travel burdens, and facilitate more frequent patient-provider interactions. The presence of robust broadband internet infrastructure is a prerequisite for effective telemedicine implementation.
The psychological impact of COPD is often underestimated. Living with a chronic respiratory illness can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial aspect of comprehensive COPD care. This involves assessing the proximity of mental health providers, the availability of mental health services within primary care practices, and the presence of support groups for COPD patients. Integrated care models, where mental health professionals collaborate directly with primary care physicians and pulmonologists, can improve patient outcomes.
Identifying standout practices within the 17059 ZIP code is essential. This involves recognizing practices that demonstrate excellence in COPD management. Factors to consider include patient satisfaction scores, adherence to evidence-based guidelines, the adoption of innovative technologies, and the integration of mental health services. Publicly available data, such as patient reviews and practice ratings, can provide valuable insights. Furthermore, reaching out to local patient advocacy groups can offer a valuable perspective on the experiences of COPD patients in the area.
The assessment of COPD care in Mifflintown and the surrounding area also requires a consideration of socioeconomic factors. Poverty, lack of access to transportation, and limited health literacy can all negatively impact patient outcomes. Understanding the demographics of the population served by local healthcare providers is essential. This includes assessing the prevalence of risk factors for COPD, such as smoking rates and exposure to environmental pollutants. Targeted interventions, such as smoking cessation programs and educational initiatives, can address these disparities.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the role of local hospitals and healthcare systems. Assessing their capacity to provide acute care services for COPD exacerbations is crucial. This includes evaluating the availability of specialized respiratory care units, the expertise of hospital staff in managing COPD patients, and the implementation of protocols for prompt and effective treatment. Collaboration between primary care physicians, specialists, and hospitals is essential for ensuring seamless care transitions.
Finally, a comprehensive analysis should consider the future of COPD care in the region. This involves assessing the potential for technological advancements, such as the development of new medications and devices. It also involves evaluating the impact of healthcare policy changes on COPD care delivery. Staying informed about these developments is essential for ensuring that COPD patients in Mifflintown and the surrounding area receive the best possible care.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in the 17059 ZIP code, including physician locations, specialist availability, and the proximity of mental health resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping capabilities can provide a valuable tool for understanding the accessibility and distribution of care in the region.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like