The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 17070, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania is 86 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.54 percent of the residents in 17070 has some form of health insurance. 32.02 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.61 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17070 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,184 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 160 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17070. An estimate of 22 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,867 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 34,338 health care providers accessible to residents in 17070, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17070, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 88 |
---|---|
People Score | 41 |
Provider Score | 86 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 75 |
17070 | New Cumberland | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: New Cumberland, PA (ZIP Code 17070)
Analyzing the COPD landscape in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 17070) necessitates a multi-faceted approach, considering both the prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and the accessibility and quality of primary care services available to residents. This analysis will explore key factors influencing COPD management, focusing on physician availability, innovative practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, ultimately aiming to provide a COPD Score assessment for the area.
The foundation of effective COPD care lies in the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). A critical metric is the physician-to-patient ratio. While precise figures fluctuate, national averages often serve as a benchmark. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Researching the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 17070 is crucial. This involves compiling a list of practicing PCPs in the area, cross-referencing it with population data, and calculating the ratio. Publicly available resources, such as the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and local hospital websites, can assist in this data collection.
Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This involves assessing the practices' commitment to COPD management protocols. Do they adhere to established guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and patient education? Do they offer spirometry testing, a vital diagnostic tool for COPD? Do they have established referral pathways to pulmonologists and respiratory therapists? Evaluating these factors requires delving into individual practice profiles. This might involve reviewing practice websites, examining patient reviews (while acknowledging their limitations), and potentially conducting surveys or interviews with local healthcare providers.
Identifying standout practices within 17070 is essential. These practices often demonstrate a proactive approach to COPD care. They may have dedicated COPD clinics, offer comprehensive patient education programs, and actively participate in quality improvement initiatives. They could be early adopters of innovative technologies or have strong partnerships with local support groups. Identifying these practices requires a combination of research, networking with local healthcare professionals, and potentially consulting with patient advocacy organizations.
Telemedicine has emerged as a significant tool in healthcare delivery, particularly for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Its adoption rate within 17070 is a critical factor. Does the area have a high percentage of PCPs offering telehealth consultations? Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas. It can also facilitate remote monitoring of patients' symptoms and medication adherence. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves researching the telehealth capabilities of local practices, examining insurance coverage for telehealth services, and understanding patient utilization rates.
The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. Patients with COPD often experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within 17070 is a crucial element of the COPD Score. This includes assessing the availability of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and support groups. Are mental health services integrated into primary care practices? Do local hospitals or clinics offer specialized mental health programs for patients with chronic respiratory conditions? The presence of these resources significantly impacts the overall quality of COPD care.
The COPD Score itself would be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted average of the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio, quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability would each contribute to the score. The weighting assigned to each factor would depend on its perceived importance in influencing COPD outcomes. For example, a low physician-to-patient ratio might negatively impact the score, while a high adoption rate of telemedicine could positively influence it.
The final COPD Score would provide a relative assessment of the area's capacity to effectively manage COPD. It would not be an absolute measure but rather a comparative one, allowing for benchmarking against other ZIP codes or regions. It would highlight areas of strength and weakness, providing valuable insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients.
Furthermore, analyzing the availability of primary care within New Cumberland necessitates a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources. Are there areas within 17070 with limited access to PCPs? Are transportation barriers hindering patients' ability to reach medical facilities? Addressing these questions requires a spatial analysis of healthcare resources, considering factors like population density, proximity to medical facilities, and transportation infrastructure.
This geographic analysis can reveal disparities in access to care, highlighting areas where targeted interventions are needed. For example, if a significant portion of the population resides in an area with limited access to PCPs, efforts could be directed towards establishing new clinics, expanding telemedicine services, or improving transportation options.
In conclusion, assessing the COPD landscape in New Cumberland, PA (17070) requires a comprehensive analysis of physician availability, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. This analysis should inform a COPD Score, which would provide a valuable tool for evaluating the area's capacity to effectively manage this chronic disease.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas with limited access to care, and gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing COPD management within 17070, we encourage you to explore the power of geographic data visualization.
**Click here to explore a map of healthcare resources in your area with CartoChrome maps.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like