The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 17101, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania is 89 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.79 percent of the residents in 17101 has some form of health insurance. 33.05 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.71 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17101 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 152 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 61 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17101. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 366 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 19,672 health care providers accessible to residents in 17101, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17101, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 87 |
---|---|
People Score | 29 |
Provider Score | 89 |
Hospital Score | 70 |
Travel Score | 66 |
17101 | Harrisburg | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Harrisburg, PA (ZIP Code 17101)
This analysis provides a COPD Score evaluation for physicians within ZIP Code 17101 in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, adoption of telemedicine, and integration of mental health resources. This assessment aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape for individuals managing or at risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of a strong COPD care system is accessible primary care. In Harrisburg's 17101 ZIP code, primary care availability presents a mixed picture. While several established practices exist, the demand for primary care services often outstrips supply. This can result in longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment for COPD patients. The concentration of healthcare facilities in specific areas of the ZIP code, such as near hospitals and major medical centers, can also create disparities in access for residents in other areas.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of healthcare access. Ideally, a lower ratio, representing fewer patients per physician, allows for more personalized care and greater time dedicated to each patient. However, in 17101, the physician-to-patient ratio for primary care physicians can be challenging. The high patient volume often necessitates shorter appointment times, potentially hindering thorough assessments and the development of comprehensive COPD management plans. This can be further exacerbated by the prevalence of chronic conditions, including COPD, within the population.
Identifying standout practices is crucial. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to COPD care often excel in several areas. These include early and accurate diagnosis, effective medication management, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, patient education, and proactive monitoring. Some practices in the area may have established specialized COPD clinics or dedicated respiratory therapists, providing a higher level of expertise and support. Researching online reviews, seeking recommendations from other patients, and consulting with local advocacy groups can help identify these exemplary practices.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve COPD care, especially in areas with access challenges. Telemedicine enables remote consultations, medication management, and monitoring of patients' conditions. In 17101, the adoption of telemedicine varies among practices. Some practices have embraced telehealth platforms, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring devices, allowing patients to receive care from the comfort of their homes. However, other practices may lag in this area, potentially limiting access for patients who face transportation difficulties or live in underserved areas.
The integration of mental health resources is a vital component of COPD care. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, are better equipped to provide holistic care. In 17101, the availability of mental health resources within primary care practices varies. Some practices may have integrated behavioral health specialists, while others may rely on referrals to external mental health providers. The presence of robust mental health support can significantly improve patient outcomes.
Further analysis should consider the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs within the ZIP code. These programs are essential for improving lung function, exercise capacity, and overall quality of life for COPD patients. The presence of these programs, and their accessibility, can greatly impact the effectiveness of COPD management.
The presence of community resources, such as support groups and educational programs, also plays a crucial role in patient well-being. These resources provide patients with opportunities to connect with others, share experiences, and learn coping strategies. The availability and accessibility of these resources within the 17101 ZIP code should be considered.
Evaluating the cost of care is another important factor. The financial burden of COPD can be significant, including the cost of medications, doctor visits, and hospitalizations. Practices that offer affordable care, accept a wide range of insurance plans, and provide financial assistance programs can improve access to care for all patients.
The overall COPD Score for physicians in 17101 is a reflection of the interplay of all these factors. It is a complex metric that requires careful consideration of all the variables discussed. While it is difficult to give a single score without a detailed analysis, the overall picture is one of a mixed bag. While there are some excellent practices and resources available, there are also areas for improvement, particularly in terms of access, physician-to-patient ratios, and the integration of mental health services.
Improving the COPD Score in 17101 requires a multi-faceted approach. This includes increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine adoption, integrating mental health services, and promoting pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Furthermore, community awareness and patient education are essential to empower individuals to take control of their health and seek appropriate care.
Understanding the specific geographic distribution of healthcare resources within the ZIP code is also essential. This can highlight areas where access to care is limited and inform strategies for improving healthcare delivery.
For a detailed, visually compelling understanding of the healthcare landscape in Harrisburg, PA, including the location of practices, physician density, and access to resources, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like