17211, Artemas, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 17211, Artemas, Pennsylvania is 20 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.29 percent of the residents in 17211 has some form of health insurance. 43.96 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17211 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 102 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17211. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 90 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 40 health care providers accessible to residents in 17211, Artemas, Pennsylvania.

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17211 & Primary Care in Artemas

Analyzing the availability of quality primary care, particularly concerning the management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on two distinct geographic areas: doctors practicing within ZIP code 17211 (Chambersburg, Pennsylvania) and the primary care landscape in Artemas, Pennsylvania. Our evaluation will consider several factors crucial to COPD patient care, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of COPD management.

ZIP code 17211, encompassing a significant portion of Chambersburg, presents a relatively populated area with a diverse demographic. Assessing COPD care here requires a deep dive into the local healthcare ecosystem. The physician-to-patient ratio becomes a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can potentially strain resources and impact appointment availability, which is crucial for COPD patients requiring regular check-ups and management. We need to identify the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists actively practicing within this ZIP code, alongside the overall population. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the US Census Bureau can provide the raw numbers.

Beyond the raw numbers, we must identify standout practices. These are healthcare providers that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive COPD care. This involves evaluating their patient outcomes, the breadth of services offered, and their adherence to current COPD treatment guidelines. A practice scoring highly would likely offer pulmonary function testing (PFTs), access to respiratory therapists, and structured COPD education programs. Moreover, the integration of a multidisciplinary approach, involving specialists such as cardiologists and physical therapists, would be a significant positive indicator. Researching patient reviews and testimonials can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and the quality of care provided.

The adoption of telemedicine is another vital aspect of COPD care, especially in areas with potential access limitations. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and monitoring of patients' respiratory status. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient access to care, reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, and potentially minimize exacerbations. Evaluating the availability of telehealth services, including the types of platforms used and the frequency of their utilization, is crucial for a comprehensive COPD score.

Mental health is inextricably linked to COPD. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its physical limitations, can lead to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting is a key component of a good COPD score. We must assess whether practices in 17211 offer on-site mental health services, referrals to mental health professionals, or integration with mental health support groups. The presence of these resources signifies a holistic approach to patient care.

Shifting our focus to Artemas, Pennsylvania, the landscape presents a different challenge. Artemas is a much smaller, more rural community, likely with fewer healthcare providers. Primary care availability becomes a significant concern. The physician-to-patient ratio is likely to be higher, and access to specialized care, such as pulmonologists, may be limited. This situation necessitates a different approach to assessing the COPD score.

The focus in Artemas shifts towards identifying the existing primary care providers and assessing their capacity to manage COPD patients. This includes evaluating their knowledge of COPD management guidelines, their access to diagnostic tools, and their ability to provide patient education. Furthermore, the availability of transportation options for patients needing to travel to specialists in nearby towns becomes a crucial factor. The presence of community health initiatives, such as mobile clinics or outreach programs, can also positively influence the COPD score in this context.

Telemedicine's role becomes even more critical in Artemas. Given the potential for limited access to specialists, the ability to conduct remote consultations with pulmonologists or other specialists can significantly improve patient care. The availability of telehealth infrastructure, including reliable internet access and the willingness of providers to embrace telemedicine, is paramount.

The assessment of mental health resources in Artemas requires a different perspective. Given the potential scarcity of mental health professionals, the focus should be on identifying any available resources, such as mental health counselors or support groups, and assessing the primary care providers' ability to recognize and address mental health concerns. The presence of any mental health support, even if limited, will positively influence the COPD score.

In conclusion, evaluating COPD care requires a comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem. For ZIP code 17211, the focus is on assessing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and assessing the availability of mental health resources. In Artemas, the emphasis shifts to primary care availability, the role of telemedicine, and the presence of any available mental health support. By considering these factors, we can gain a more accurate understanding of the quality of COPD care available in these areas.

For a visual representation of these findings and a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including the location of primary care physicians, specialists, and mental health services, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Use their platform to visualize the data, identify potential gaps in care, and gain a more complete understanding of the healthcare landscape in your area.