COPD Score

17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania is 32 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.23 percent of the residents in 17306 has some form of health insurance. 28.62 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.45 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17306 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 105 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17306. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 107 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,871 health care providers accessible to residents in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania

COPD Score 61
People Score 48
Provider Score 32
Hospital Score 68
Travel Score 60

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

17306 Bendersville Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania

The analysis of COPD care and primary care availability in ZIP Code 17306, encompassing Bendersville, Pennsylvania, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. Evaluating the quality of care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) demands an examination of physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of innovative technologies like telemedicine, the presence of robust mental health support, and the identification of standout practices. This assessment, while challenging due to data limitations, aims to provide a comprehensive overview.

Assessing physician-to-patient ratios is a crucial first step. The density of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists directly impacts access to care. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a scarcity of providers, can lead to delayed diagnoses, less frequent follow-up appointments, and ultimately, poorer COPD management. Data from the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health can provide insights into the number of practicing physicians in the area. This data needs to be compared against the estimated population of Bendersville, taking into account the prevalence of COPD, which is often higher in rural areas due to factors like smoking rates and environmental exposures.

The availability of pulmonologists, specialists in lung diseases, is particularly critical for COPD patients. While PCPs often manage the initial stages of the disease, pulmonologists are essential for complex cases, advanced treatments, and pulmonary rehabilitation. The presence of a local pulmonologist, or the proximity to one in a nearby town like Gettysburg, significantly impacts the quality of care. A high physician-to-patient ratio for pulmonologists suggests better access to specialized care.

Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, has become increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and medication management. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can offer more convenient and accessible care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. Investigating the adoption rate of telemedicine among practices in 17306 would involve contacting local clinics and hospitals to inquire about their telehealth capabilities.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in COPD care, but they are critically important. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services, such as access to therapists, support groups, or psychiatric consultations, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. Evaluating the availability of mental health resources requires examining the services offered by local clinics and hospitals, as well as the presence of mental health professionals in the area.

Identifying standout practices requires a more nuanced approach. This involves assessing patient satisfaction scores, examining the use of evidence-based guidelines for COPD management, and evaluating the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Patient satisfaction surveys, if available, can provide valuable insights into the quality of care. The adherence to evidence-based guidelines, such as those published by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), indicates a commitment to providing the best possible care. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs, which combine exercise, education, and support, are proven to improve lung function and quality of life for COPD patients. Practices that offer these programs are demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive COPD care.

Primary care availability in Bendersville also requires a detailed investigation. The presence of a strong primary care network is essential for the early detection and management of COPD. PCPs play a crucial role in screening for the disease, providing initial treatment, and referring patients to specialists when necessary. Assessing primary care availability involves evaluating the number of PCPs in the area, their hours of operation, and their acceptance of new patients. The presence of urgent care clinics or walk-in clinics can also impact access to care.

The analysis of COPD care and primary care availability in 17306, Bendersville, should also consider the demographics of the population. Understanding the age distribution, socioeconomic status, and health insurance coverage of the residents can provide a more complete picture of the challenges and opportunities in providing care. For example, a higher proportion of elderly residents may increase the prevalence of COPD, while lower socioeconomic status may limit access to care.

Data sources for this analysis would include the AMA, the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and local hospitals and clinics. Patient satisfaction surveys, if available, would provide valuable insights. The assessment would require a combination of publicly available data, direct inquiries to healthcare providers, and potentially, interviews with patients and community stakeholders.

The final COPD Score, a hypothetical metric, would be derived from a weighted average of the factors discussed above. The weights assigned to each factor would reflect their relative importance in providing high-quality COPD care. For example, physician-to-patient ratios might be weighted more heavily than the availability of telemedicine, although both are important. The score would be presented as a numerical value, with higher scores indicating better care.

The analysis would also identify areas for improvement. This might include increasing the number of PCPs and pulmonologists in the area, expanding the adoption of telemedicine, and improving access to mental health resources. The identification of these areas would inform efforts to improve COPD care in Bendersville.

The results of this analysis would offer a snapshot of the current state of COPD care and primary care availability in 17306. It would highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and provide a basis for future improvements. This information is crucial for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.

For a visual representation of the data, including physician locations, hospital locations, and other relevant information, consider exploring the power of interactive mapping. CartoChrome maps can transform complex data into easily understandable visuals, allowing you to identify patterns and trends quickly.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania

You may also like

17304, Aspers, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 0.43 Miles

Total Population:

17324, Gardners, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 3.85 Miles

Total Population:

17307, Biglerville, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 4.77 Miles

Total Population:

17343, Mc Knightstown, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 8.89 Miles

Total Population:

17353, Orrtanna, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 10.09 Miles

Total Population:

17325, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 10.73 Miles

Total Population:

17266, Walnut Bottom, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 11.39 Miles

Total Population:

17316, East Berlin, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 12.03 Miles

Total Population:

17350, New Oxford, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 17306: 12.17 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania