The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania is 68 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 55.93 percent of the residents in 17536 has some form of health insurance. 19.71 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 44.72 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17536 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,246 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17536. An estimate of 13 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 642 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,823 health care providers accessible to residents in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania
| COPD Score | 44 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 28 |
| Provider Score | 68 |
| Hospital Score | 64 |
| Travel Score | 24 |
| 17536 | Kirkwood | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis will focus on evaluating the quality of care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients in the Kirkwood area, specifically within ZIP Code 17536, considering primary care physician availability and related resources. This assessment will be framed as a "COPD Score" analysis, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.
The foundation of a strong COPD care system rests on accessible primary care. In Kirkwood (17536), the physician-to-patient ratio serves as a critical initial indicator. A higher ratio, meaning fewer patients per primary care physician, generally suggests better access to care. This analysis will need to determine the actual ratio within the ZIP code, factoring in both the number of practicing primary care physicians and the estimated population. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards will be crucial for this. A low ratio is a red flag, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and ultimately, compromised COPD management. Conversely, a favorable ratio is a positive sign, though it doesn't guarantee quality.
Beyond sheer numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians matters. Are physicians concentrated in specific areas within 17536, creating "healthcare deserts" for certain residents? Are practices accepting new patients, particularly those with chronic conditions like COPD? This involves examining the geographic distribution of practices and their patient acceptance policies. Practices that actively welcome new patients, especially those with COPD, will score higher in the analysis.
The quality of care provided by individual practices is another key element of the COPD Score. This goes beyond the physician-to-patient ratio. We need to investigate the adoption of best practices in COPD management. This includes the use of standardized diagnostic tools (spirometry), regular pulmonary function testing, and adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines. Practices that consistently implement these practices will be ranked higher. Data on these metrics can be challenging to obtain, but sources like patient reviews, health insurance claims data (if accessible), and physician self-reporting (if available) can provide clues.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine allows for remote monitoring of patients' symptoms, medication adjustments, and virtual consultations. Practices that offer telemedicine services, particularly for COPD patients, will receive a significant boost in their score. This includes assessing the types of telemedicine services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring devices) and the accessibility of these services to patients (e.g., ease of use, cost).
Mental health resources are also essential. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The analysis will assess the availability of mental health services within the practices and the broader community. This includes whether primary care physicians screen for mental health issues, the availability of on-site mental health professionals (e.g., psychologists, therapists), and referral pathways to external mental health services. Practices that integrate mental health care into their COPD management plans will score higher.
Specific practices within 17536 will be examined to identify standout performers. This involves researching individual practices, looking at their websites, reading patient reviews, and, if possible, contacting them directly to gather information. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive COPD care, including a strong physician-to-patient ratio, adoption of best practices, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, will be highlighted. This may include identifying practices that specialize in respiratory care or have dedicated COPD programs.
The availability of respiratory therapists and pulmonologists in the area is also critical. COPD patients often require specialized care, including pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen therapy, and management of exacerbations. The analysis will assess the proximity of pulmonologists and respiratory therapists to the primary care practices in 17536. Easy access to these specialists is crucial for optimal COPD management.
The analysis will also consider the availability of patient education resources. COPD patients need to be well-informed about their condition, treatment options, and self-management strategies. Practices that provide patient education materials, support groups, and access to educational programs will be viewed favorably.
The overall "COPD Score" for the healthcare landscape in Kirkwood (17536) will be a composite score based on all these factors. The score will be a relative measure, comparing the quality of care in 17536 to other areas. The final score will be a reflection of the overall strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system in addressing the needs of COPD patients. The analysis will highlight areas where improvements are needed, such as increasing physician availability, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding mental health support. The goal is to provide a clear and concise assessment of the quality of COPD care in the area, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
This analysis will provide a comprehensive overview of the COPD care landscape in Kirkwood (17536). It will offer valuable insights into the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of care available to COPD patients. The final "COPD Score" will serve as a useful tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.
To visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and the overall "COPD Score" within the 17536 ZIP code, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps available through CartoChrome. CartoChrome's mapping capabilities can help you see the physician-to-patient ratios, the locations of practices, the availability of specialists, and other relevant data points in a clear and visually engaging format. Visit CartoChrome today to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Kirkwood and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like