17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania is 51 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.61 percent of the residents in 17952 has some form of health insurance. 38.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17952 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 39 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17952. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 49 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 894 health care providers accessible to residents in 17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania.

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17952 and Primary Care Availability in Mary D

Analyzing the COPD landscape within ZIP code 17952, and particularly focusing on primary care accessibility for residents of Mary D, requires a multi-faceted approach. A "COPD Score" in this context isn't a single, quantifiable metric, but rather a composite assessment reflecting the availability, quality, and accessibility of care for individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. This analysis considers several key factors, including physician density, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial elements in effective COPD management.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of access. In ZIP code 17952, the concentration of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts the ability of COPD patients to secure timely appointments, establish ongoing care relationships, and receive necessary follow-up. A higher ratio of patients per PCP can lead to longer wait times, potentially delaying diagnosis or exacerbation management. Conversely, a lower ratio generally suggests better access and the potential for more comprehensive care. Data on the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 17952 is essential. Publicly available resources, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards, can provide this information. Furthermore, examining the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is critical. Are physicians clustered in one area, leaving other areas underserved? This geographic analysis is particularly relevant for Mary D residents, as their proximity to available PCPs is a significant determinant of their access to care.

Identifying standout practices within 17952 is crucial. This involves evaluating practices based on several criteria. Do they have a demonstrable focus on COPD management? This can be evidenced by specialized equipment, dedicated staff training, and participation in COPD-specific quality improvement programs. Practices that proactively manage COPD patients, offering regular check-ups, medication management, and patient education, are highly valuable. Reviews from patients, while subjective, can offer insights into patient satisfaction, communication, and the overall quality of care. Analyzing the insurance plans accepted by each practice is also important, as it directly affects accessibility for residents of Mary D and their ability to afford care. Practices that accept a broad range of insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, are generally more accessible to a wider patient population.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly relevant for COPD management. Remote monitoring tools, virtual consultations, and online educational resources can significantly improve patient outcomes. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies can offer greater convenience, reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, and facilitate more proactive management of COPD symptoms. The availability of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation programs, for example, can be a game-changer for patients who may have mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within practices in 17952, including the types of services offered and the technology used, is a key component of the COPD Score analysis.

The often-overlooked aspect of mental health support is integral to COPD care. COPD can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize and address the mental health needs of their patients are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. This includes offering access to mental health professionals, either within the practice or through referrals, and integrating mental health screening into routine care. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, can also provide valuable emotional support and peer-to-peer learning opportunities. Evaluating the availability of these resources within the practices in 17952 is critical for a holistic COPD Score assessment.

For Mary D residents, the accessibility of primary care is paramount. This includes not only the availability of PCPs within the ZIP code but also the ease of transportation, the acceptance of their insurance plans, and the ability to secure timely appointments. Analyzing the proximity of Mary D residents to the practices identified as standouts is crucial. Are there transportation options available for those who cannot drive? Are there practices that offer evening or weekend appointments to accommodate work schedules? The overall accessibility of primary care directly impacts the ability of Mary D residents to effectively manage their COPD.

To provide a truly comprehensive COPD Score analysis, it is important to consider the specific needs of the population within 17952. This includes factors such as the prevalence of COPD, the demographic characteristics of the population, and any existing health disparities. Public health data, combined with information from local healthcare providers, can provide valuable insights into these factors. This data can then be used to tailor the COPD Score analysis to the specific needs of the community, ensuring that the assessment is relevant and actionable.

In conclusion, assessing the COPD landscape in 17952 and primary care availability for Mary D requires a detailed examination of physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health support. This analysis should be data-driven, incorporating information from multiple sources and considering the specific needs of the community. Understanding these factors allows for a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of care for individuals managing COPD.

To gain a visual understanding of the distribution of physicians, practices, and resources within 17952, consider exploring the power of spatial data analysis. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize these complex relationships, revealing patterns and insights that might otherwise be missed.