The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 18254, Tresckow, Pennsylvania is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.97 percent of the residents in 18254 has some form of health insurance. 41.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.74 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18254 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 294 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18254. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 193 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,804 health care providers accessible to residents in 18254, Tresckow, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18254, Tresckow, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 80 |
---|---|
People Score | 62 |
Provider Score | 48 |
Hospital Score | 66 |
Travel Score | 63 |
18254 | Tresckow | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the healthcare landscape for individuals grappling with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Tresckow, Pennsylvania, specifically within the 18254 ZIP code, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis aims to provide a COPD Score assessment, considering factors like physician availability, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health resources, all critical components of effective COPD management. The goal is to gauge the quality and accessibility of care for residents of this area.
The foundation of any COPD care assessment is the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Tresckow, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of PCPs relative to the population, can significantly hinder timely diagnosis, regular check-ups, and medication management, all vital for COPD patients. Accurate data on this ratio is essential. Publicly available resources, such as those from the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with information from physician directories, are necessary to determine the current PCP density.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality and specialization of available physicians are important. Are there pulmonologists or respiratory therapists readily accessible within a reasonable distance? COPD management often requires specialized expertise. The presence of these specialists directly impacts the COPD Score. A community with easy access to pulmonologists and respiratory therapists would receive a higher score than one where patients must travel long distances for specialized care.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine offers significant advantages for COPD patients, including remote monitoring of vital signs, virtual consultations, and medication adherence support. Its availability can improve patient outcomes, especially for those with mobility limitations or living in rural areas. The COPD Score should reflect the degree to which local practices embrace telemedicine. Does the practice offer virtual appointments? Do they utilize remote monitoring devices? The more integrated telemedicine is, the higher the score.
Mental health resources are frequently overlooked but are crucial for COPD patients. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with the physical limitations it imposes, can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Access to mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services is essential for holistic care. The COPD Score must evaluate the availability of these resources. Are there mental health professionals accepting new patients in the area? Are there support groups specifically for individuals with COPD?
Identifying standout practices is also part of the assessment. Some practices may excel in COPD management, offering comprehensive care plans, patient education programs, and strong patient-physician communication. Researching patient reviews, contacting local hospitals, and consulting with community health organizations can help identify these exemplary practices. Their presence significantly elevates the overall COPD Score for the area.
The analysis must consider the availability of diagnostic tools and treatment options. Does the local hospital or clinic offer pulmonary function testing (PFTs)? Are the latest COPD medications readily available at local pharmacies? Access to these essential resources directly impacts the ability to diagnose and treat COPD effectively. A community with easy access to these resources will receive a higher score.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the prevalence of COPD within the 18254 ZIP code. Public health data, if available, can provide insights into the local COPD burden. A higher prevalence may indicate a greater need for resources and services. This information can be used to weight the other factors in the COPD Score calculation.
The COPD Score is not a static number; it is a dynamic assessment that should be regularly updated. Healthcare landscapes change, and the availability of resources can fluctuate. Regular reassessment ensures that the COPD Score remains relevant and reflects the current state of care in Tresckow.
The assessment should also consider the socioeconomic factors affecting access to care. Transportation limitations, insurance coverage, and financial constraints can all create barriers to healthcare. The COPD Score should reflect the degree to which these factors impact patient access. Are there transportation services available for patients? Are there financial assistance programs for COPD medications?
The overall COPD Score will be a composite measure. It will combine data on physician-to-patient ratios, specialist availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, access to diagnostic tools and medications, and socioeconomic factors. Each factor will be weighted based on its importance to COPD management. The final score will provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of COPD care in the 18254 ZIP code.
The analysis also needs to consider the quality of patient education and self-management programs. COPD patients need to understand their condition, learn how to manage their symptoms, and take an active role in their care. Practices that offer patient education programs, support groups, and self-management tools will contribute to a higher COPD Score.
Finally, the analysis should evaluate the level of collaboration among healthcare providers. Effective COPD management often requires a team approach, involving PCPs, pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals. Practices that foster collaboration and communication among these providers will receive a higher score.
For a more detailed and visually engaging understanding of the healthcare landscape in Tresckow, Pennsylvania, and to identify the optimal locations for healthcare services, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that can visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant data points. This can help you gain a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities related to COPD care in the area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like