COPD Score

18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania is 51 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.11 percent of the residents in 18437 has some form of health insurance. 47.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.50 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18437 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 21 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18437. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 46 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 951 health care providers accessible to residents in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania

COPD Score 43
People Score 50
Provider Score 51
Hospital Score 57
Travel Score 25

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

18437 Lake Como Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania

## COPD Score Analysis: Lake Como, PA (ZIP Code 18437)

Analyzing the availability of quality COPD care within ZIP Code 18437 (Lake Como, Pennsylvania) necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers factors impacting patient access, including physician density, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial elements for effective COPD management. The goal is to provide a "COPD Score" assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.

The primary concern in a rural area like Lake Como is likely physician density. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio suggests potential difficulties in accessing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment. Publicly available data, such as that from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, can be used to calculate this ratio. A low ratio would negatively impact the COPD Score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the type of primary care practices available plays a significant role. Are there solo practitioners, small group practices, or larger, multi-specialty clinics? Larger practices often have the resources to offer a broader range of services, including on-site pulmonary function testing (PFTs), which is essential for COPD diagnosis and monitoring. The presence of registered respiratory therapists (RRTs) within a practice is another positive factor, indicating a commitment to specialized respiratory care. Practices with these features would contribute positively to the COPD Score.

Telemedicine has the potential to bridge geographical barriers, especially in rural communities. Practices that have adopted telemedicine platforms for virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring can significantly improve patient access. This is particularly beneficial for COPD patients, who may struggle with travel due to breathing difficulties. The availability of telemedicine services, and the ease of access to those services, is a key component of a positive COPD Score.

COPD is a chronic condition that often co-exists with mental health challenges, such as anxiety and depression. Patients struggling with these conditions can experience a decline in their overall health and quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is crucial. Does the local primary care network include access to psychiatrists, psychologists, or licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs)? Are there partnerships with mental health organizations? The presence of these resources, or the ability to easily connect patients to them, would contribute to a higher COPD Score.

Identifying standout practices is vital. Some practices in the Lake Como area may excel in COPD management. These practices might have a dedicated COPD clinic, offer comprehensive patient education programs, or actively participate in clinical trials. Researching patient reviews, speaking with local community health organizations, and analyzing practice websites can help identify these standout providers. Recognizing and highlighting these practices would allow for a more nuanced COPD Score, acknowledging the strengths within the community.

The COPD Score is not a static number. It is a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape. Regular updates are necessary to account for changes in physician availability, practice models, and the adoption of new technologies. The score should be transparent, using a clearly defined methodology and data sources.

The analysis should also consider the role of local hospitals and specialists. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and other specialists is essential for complex cases. The proximity of these specialists and the ease of referral processes contribute to a positive COPD Score.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of support groups and educational resources for COPD patients. These resources can empower patients to manage their condition effectively, improving their quality of life. The presence of these resources, such as support groups and educational materials, would contribute positively to the COPD Score.

Finally, the analysis should consider the role of pharmacies and medication access. Ensuring that patients can easily access their medications is crucial for effective COPD management. The presence of local pharmacies and the availability of medication assistance programs would contribute positively to the COPD Score.

In conclusion, the COPD Score for Lake Como, PA (18437) requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician density, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, standout practices, specialist availability, support groups, and medication access. This multi-faceted approach provides a more accurate and useful assessment of the local healthcare landscape for COPD patients.

Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Lake Como and other areas? Explore the power of spatial data analysis with CartoChrome maps. Gain deeper insights into physician distribution, patient demographics, and healthcare resource accessibility.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania

You may also like

18424, Gouldsboro, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 8.93 Miles

Total Population:

18466, Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 10.14 Miles

Total Population:

18460, South Sterling, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 12.39 Miles

Total Population:

18444, Moscow, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 12.97 Miles

Total Population:

18445, Newfoundland, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 13.60 Miles

Total Population:

18427, Hamlin, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 19.02 Miles

Total Population:

18426, Greentown, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 20.23 Miles

Total Population:

18436, Lake Ariel, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 21.23 Miles

Total Population:

18447, Olyphant, Pennsylvania
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 18437: 21.68 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania