The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 18651, Plymouth, Pennsylvania is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.35 percent of the residents in 18651 has some form of health insurance. 50.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18651 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,942 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18651. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,608 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,085 health care providers accessible to residents in 18651, Plymouth, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18651, Plymouth, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 40 |
---|---|
People Score | 12 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 35 |
Travel Score | 57 |
18651 | Plymouth | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Plymouth, PA (ZIP Code 18651)
Plymouth, Pennsylvania, nestled within ZIP code 18651, presents a unique challenge in assessing COPD care. This analysis aims to provide a COPD Score, evaluating the quality and accessibility of care for individuals managing this chronic respiratory disease. We will examine factors like physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, all crucial for comprehensive COPD management.
The foundation of any COPD Score rests on physician availability. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. In Plymouth, determining this ratio accurately requires meticulous data gathering. We must consider the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists actively practicing within the ZIP code, and the estimated population. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, combined with information from professional medical directories, would provide the most accurate picture. A low physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for pulmonologists, suggests potential access barriers, especially for timely diagnosis and specialized care. Conversely, a higher ratio indicates potentially better access, allowing for more frequent check-ups and consultations.
Primary care is the cornerstone of COPD management. The availability and quality of primary care providers directly impact patient outcomes. Assessing this requires examining the number of PCPs accepting new patients, the range of services offered (including spirometry and pulmonary function testing), and the practice's adherence to established COPD guidelines. Practices that offer comprehensive care, including patient education, smoking cessation programs, and regular monitoring of lung function, would score higher. We must also consider the presence of certified respiratory therapists (RRTs) within these practices, as they play a vital role in patient education and support.
Beyond physician availability, the characteristics of medical practices significantly influence COPD care. Standout practices in Plymouth would demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care. This includes offering extended hours, weekend appointments, and readily available communication channels (phone, email, patient portals). Practices that integrate electronic health records (EHRs) to facilitate care coordination and medication management would also receive higher scores. Furthermore, practices actively participating in quality improvement initiatives, such as those aimed at reducing COPD exacerbations, would be considered exemplary.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine allows for remote monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management, potentially reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. Practices in Plymouth that have embraced telemedicine, offering services like virtual pulmonary rehabilitation or remote monitoring of vital signs, would receive a higher score. The availability of telehealth can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas, improving access to care and reducing the burden of travel.
The psychological impact of COPD cannot be overstated. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its debilitating symptoms, can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of a comprehensive COPD Score. This includes assessing the availability of mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) in the area, and the integration of mental health services within primary care practices. Practices that screen for mental health issues, offer counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health specialists would receive a higher score. This integration ensures that patients receive holistic care, addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of their condition.
The COPD Score for Plymouth, PA, would be a composite of these factors. Each element (physician-to-patient ratio, primary care quality, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources) would be weighted based on its relative importance. The final score would reflect the overall quality and accessibility of COPD care in the area. A high score would indicate a well-resourced healthcare environment, with ample access to qualified physicians, comprehensive services, and supportive resources. A low score would highlight areas for improvement, such as addressing physician shortages, enhancing telemedicine capabilities, and integrating mental health services.
The analysis would also consider specific challenges unique to Plymouth. For example, the socioeconomic status of the population, the prevalence of smoking, and the environmental conditions (air quality) could influence COPD prevalence and severity. Understanding these factors would allow for a more nuanced assessment of the local healthcare needs.
The assessment of primary care availability in Plymouth, PA, would involve a similar process. We would analyze the number of PCPs, their acceptance of new patients, the range of services offered, and their adherence to clinical guidelines. The presence of specialized programs, such as chronic disease management programs, would be a positive indicator. The accessibility of primary care, including appointment availability and wait times, would also be assessed.
Ultimately, the goal of this COPD Score analysis is to provide a clear and actionable assessment of COPD care in Plymouth. This information can be used by healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. It can also inform efforts to improve access to care, enhance the quality of services, and ultimately, improve the lives of individuals living with COPD in Plymouth, PA.
To visualize this data, and to gain a deeper understanding of healthcare accessibility in Plymouth, PA, we encourage you to explore the power of geographic data visualization. CartoChrome Maps offers a comprehensive platform for mapping and analyzing health data, allowing you to identify patterns, trends, and disparities in healthcare access. **Visit CartoChrome Maps today to unlock the power of location intelligence and gain a more informed perspective on healthcare in your community.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like