The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 18661, White Haven, Pennsylvania is 66 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.19 percent of the residents in 18661 has some form of health insurance. 43.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.08 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18661 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,018 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18661. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,180 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,737 health care providers accessible to residents in 18661, White Haven, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18661, White Haven, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 45 |
---|---|
People Score | 36 |
Provider Score | 66 |
Hospital Score | 40 |
Travel Score | 44 |
18661 | White Haven | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**COPD Score Analysis: Primary Care and COPD Management in White Haven, PA (ZIP Code 18661)**
White Haven, Pennsylvania, nestled within the Pocono Mountains, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities when evaluating the availability and quality of primary care, particularly concerning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management. This analysis, framed as a "COPD Score," aims to assess the landscape for patients residing in ZIP code 18661, focusing on key factors influencing COPD care, including physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and access to mental health support.
The foundation of effective COPD care rests on a robust primary care infrastructure. Analyzing physician-to-patient ratios is crucial. Unfortunately, publicly available data often lags and may not fully capture the nuances of a rural area like White Haven. However, we can extrapolate based on broader county-level data (e.g., Luzerne County) and national averages. If Luzerne County reflects a lower-than-average physician-to-population ratio, it suggests potential challenges in accessing timely primary care appointments. This scarcity can exacerbate COPD management, as regular check-ups, medication adjustments, and patient education are critical for disease control. The COPD Score would be negatively impacted by a low physician-to-patient ratio.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians (PCPs) within the ZIP code is vital. Are PCPs clustered in one specific area, or are they spread out to serve the diverse geographic needs of the community? Accessibility becomes a significant hurdle if patients, especially those with mobility limitations common in COPD, face long travel distances to reach their doctors. The COPD Score considers the geographic distribution of practices and the potential impact on patient access.
Examining the characteristics of individual practices is essential. Some practices may stand out in their approach to COPD management. Do they have dedicated respiratory therapists or nurses specializing in pulmonary care? Do they offer pulmonary function testing (PFT) on-site, allowing for quicker diagnoses and monitoring of lung function? Practices with these resources would receive a higher COPD Score, reflecting their commitment to comprehensive COPD care. The presence of certified respiratory educators (CREs) is particularly valuable, as they can provide crucial patient education on medication adherence, breathing techniques, and lifestyle modifications.
Telemedicine adoption represents another critical element of the COPD Score. Telemedicine offers significant advantages in managing chronic conditions like COPD, especially in rural settings. Virtual consultations can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, saving patients time and travel expenses. Remote monitoring technologies, such as wearable sensors that track vital signs and activity levels, can provide valuable data to physicians, enabling proactive interventions and preventing exacerbations. Practices that embrace telemedicine, providing virtual check-ins, medication refills, and remote monitoring capabilities, would receive a higher score.
The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. Patients with COPD frequently experience anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. Effective COPD management requires addressing these mental health concerns. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through readily accessible referrals is a critical factor in the COPD Score. Practices that integrate behavioral health services, either through on-site therapists or strong referral networks to mental health professionals, will be favorably evaluated. The COPD Score reflects the importance of a holistic approach to patient care.
Furthermore, the COPD Score considers the practice's commitment to patient education and self-management. Do practices provide educational materials on COPD, including information on medication management, breathing exercises, and smoking cessation programs? Do they actively involve patients in their care plans, empowering them to take control of their health? Practices that prioritize patient education and self-management support will receive a higher score, recognizing the importance of patient engagement in achieving positive outcomes.
Another factor is the practice's adherence to evidence-based guidelines for COPD management. Does the practice follow the latest recommendations from organizations like the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)? Are they using appropriate medications and therapies based on the severity of the patient's disease? Practices that adhere to these guidelines will receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to providing high-quality, evidence-based care.
In assessing the COPD Score, we also consider the practice's responsiveness to patient needs. Does the practice have a system for handling urgent appointments and after-hours care? Is it easy for patients to contact their physician or nurse? Practices that prioritize patient communication and responsiveness will receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to providing accessible and responsive care.
Finally, the COPD Score considers the practice's commitment to continuous quality improvement. Does the practice regularly review its performance and identify areas for improvement? Does it participate in quality improvement initiatives or clinical trials? Practices that are committed to continuous improvement will receive a higher score, reflecting their dedication to providing the best possible care.
In conclusion, the COPD Score for ZIP code 18661 is complex and multifaceted, considering physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, mental health resources, and patient education. While a precise numerical score requires detailed, up-to-date data, this analysis provides a framework for understanding the key factors influencing COPD care in White Haven. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for improving the quality of care for patients with COPD.
**Call to Action:**
Want to visualize the distribution of primary care physicians, map practice locations, and analyze access to care in White Haven and surrounding areas? Explore the possibilities of mapping these crucial healthcare elements with CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in your community and identify opportunities for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like