The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 19074, Norwood, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.41 percent of the residents in 19074 has some form of health insurance. 32.53 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19074 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,317 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 407 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19074. An estimate of 83 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 674 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 91,999 health care providers accessible to residents in 19074, Norwood, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19074, Norwood, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 88 |
---|---|
People Score | 51 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 76 |
19074 | Norwood | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Norwood, PA (ZIP Code 19074)
Analyzing the landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care in Norwood, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 19074) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis, a 'COPD Score' assessment, considers various factors, from physician availability and resource allocation to telemedicine adoption and mental health support, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the quality and accessibility of care for individuals managing this debilitating respiratory condition. This assessment aims to provide a nuanced perspective, highlighting strengths and weaknesses within the local healthcare ecosystem.
The foundation of effective COPD management rests upon accessible and qualified primary care physicians. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio in Norwood is crucial. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment initiation. Conversely, a favorable ratio, coupled with efficient appointment scheduling systems, facilitates proactive management and timely interventions. The analysis would investigate the specific number of primary care physicians practicing within the 19074 ZIP code, comparing this to the estimated population to determine the physician-to-patient ratio. This data point is critical in establishing a baseline understanding of access to care.
Beyond mere numbers, the quality of care provided by primary care physicians is paramount. This 'COPD Score' analysis would delve into the qualifications and experience of local physicians. This includes examining board certifications, specializations, and years of experience in treating respiratory conditions. Furthermore, the analysis would consider the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as adherence to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, which are internationally recognized standards for COPD diagnosis and management. The analysis would also assess the availability of on-site diagnostic tools, such as spirometry, which is essential for accurate COPD diagnosis and monitoring.
Identifying standout practices within Norwood is a key objective. These practices often serve as models for best practices and offer insights into successful approaches to COPD care. The analysis would evaluate practices based on several criteria. Patient satisfaction surveys, available through various online platforms and potentially through direct patient interviews, offer valuable insights into the patient experience. The availability of patient education resources, such as educational materials, support groups, and smoking cessation programs, is another critical factor. Practices demonstrating a commitment to proactive care, including regular follow-up appointments and medication management, would receive higher scores.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including increased accessibility, reduced travel time, and improved patient monitoring. This analysis would assess the extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care physicians in Norwood. The analysis would investigate whether physicians offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and access to online patient portals for communication and medication refills. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine technologies would receive higher scores, reflecting their commitment to patient convenience and improved access to care.
The complex nature of COPD often necessitates addressing the psychological and emotional well-being of patients. The 'COPD Score' analysis would examine the availability of mental health resources within the local healthcare system. This includes assessing the presence of on-site mental health professionals or referrals to external mental health providers. The analysis would also consider the availability of support groups, counseling services, and other resources designed to address the psychological impact of COPD, such as anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices demonstrating a commitment to integrated mental health care would be recognized for their holistic approach to patient well-being.
Medication management is a cornerstone of COPD treatment. This analysis would evaluate the processes in place for medication adherence and education. This includes assessing the availability of medication reconciliation services, which help to ensure that patients are taking the correct medications at the correct dosages. The analysis would also consider the availability of medication education materials and counseling services to help patients understand their medications and manage potential side effects. Practices with robust medication management programs would receive higher scores.
The analysis would also consider the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. These programs, which combine exercise, education, and support, are proven to improve lung function, reduce symptoms, and enhance quality of life for individuals with COPD. The analysis would identify the presence of local pulmonary rehabilitation programs and assess their accessibility, program offerings, and patient outcomes. Practices with strong connections to pulmonary rehabilitation programs would be recognized for their commitment to comprehensive COPD care.
The 'COPD Score' analysis would also consider the availability of specialized respiratory care services, such as pulmonologists and respiratory therapists. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to specialists is crucial for complex cases and advanced treatment options. The analysis would identify the presence of pulmonologists and respiratory therapists within the 19074 ZIP code and assess their availability and accessibility. The analysis would also consider the referral processes in place between primary care physicians and specialists.
Finally, the 'COPD Score' analysis would integrate all the aforementioned factors to provide a comprehensive assessment of COPD care in Norwood, PA. The analysis would assign scores based on each factor, with weighted values reflecting the relative importance of each aspect of care. The overall score would provide a clear indication of the quality and accessibility of COPD care in the local area. This data-driven approach offers a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.
For a visual representation of the findings and a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. These maps offer a dynamic and informative way to visualize the 'COPD Score' analysis results and identify areas of strength and weakness within the local healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like