19131, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 19131, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.41 percent of the residents in 19131 has some form of health insurance. 46.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19131 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 11,061 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19131. An estimate of 107 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,552 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 103,973 health care providers accessible to residents in 19131, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The analysis below provides a hypothetical "COPD Score" assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) within the 19131 ZIP code of Philadelphia, considering factors relevant to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management. This score, though not a real, standardized metric, attempts to evaluate the quality and accessibility of COPD-focused care in this specific geographical area. The focus is on primary care availability and resources, which are critical for early diagnosis, ongoing management, and patient support.

The 19131 ZIP code, encompassing a significant portion of North Philadelphia, is known to have a diverse population and, historically, a higher prevalence of respiratory illnesses due to socioeconomic factors and environmental exposures. Therefore, access to quality primary care, particularly for COPD, is paramount. The "COPD Score" will evaluate several key components.

First, physician-to-patient ratios are crucial. A high patient-to-physician ratio can strain resources and limit the time each patient receives, potentially impacting the quality of COPD management. In this assessment, we'll assume a moderate physician-to-patient ratio in 19131, perhaps slightly above the city average, suggesting a need for improved access. This would negatively impact the COPD Score.

Second, we consider the availability of specialized pulmonary services within the primary care network. Ideally, PCPs should have strong referral pathways to pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and smoking cessation programs. The presence of these specialists and programs directly contributes to a higher COPD Score. Conversely, a lack of readily available specialist care would significantly lower the score.

Third, the adoption of telemedicine plays a vital role. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and patient education, especially beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine for COPD management, including virtual check-ins and remote monitoring, would receive a higher score. Practices lagging in this area would be penalized.

Fourth, mental health resources are critical. COPD often co-occurs with depression and anxiety, which can worsen disease outcomes. PCPs with integrated mental health services, or strong referral networks to mental health professionals, would be given a higher score. The absence of these resources would lower the score, acknowledging the holistic needs of COPD patients.

Fifth, we consider the integration of patient education and self-management programs. COPD patients need education on medication adherence, inhaler techniques, and lifestyle modifications. Practices offering these programs, either in-house or through collaborations, would receive a higher score. A lack of such programs would negatively impact the score.

Standout practices within 19131, hypothetically, might demonstrate exemplary COPD management. These practices could be identified by several factors. They may have a dedicated COPD clinic, a multidisciplinary team, a high rate of spirometry testing (essential for diagnosis), and strong patient outcomes. They might also actively participate in community outreach programs related to respiratory health. These practices would receive a significantly higher COPD Score.

Conversely, practices that lack these features would receive lower scores. This might include practices with limited staff, inadequate diagnostic equipment, or a lack of patient-centered care. Practices that are not actively involved in the community and do not focus on preventative care would be penalized.

Primary care availability across Philadelphia as a whole is also a critical factor. While the 19131 ZIP code is the focus, the broader availability of primary care in the city impacts the overall COPD Score. If the city suffers from a shortage of PCPs, or if access to care is limited due to insurance issues or transportation challenges, the COPD Score for 19131 will be affected.

The hypothetical "COPD Score" analysis for doctors in the 19131 ZIP code, therefore, becomes a composite assessment. It would consider physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialist care, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the presence of patient education programs. The performance of standout practices and the overall primary care landscape in Philadelphia would also be factored in.

This score is not a definitive ranking but a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of COPD care in the area. It highlights areas for improvement, such as increasing physician access, expanding telemedicine capabilities, and integrating mental health services. It also underscores the importance of patient education and self-management programs.

To visualize and analyze this complex data, consider the power of spatial analysis. Explore how geographic information systems (GIS) and mapping tools can reveal patterns and trends related to COPD care in Philadelphia. Tools like CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, resource availability, and patient demographics, enabling a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities in providing quality COPD care.

Do you want to visualize the distribution of primary care physicians, specialist availability, and patient demographics in the Philadelphia area? Contact CartoChrome maps to explore the power of spatial data and gain insights into the delivery of healthcare services.