19133, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 19133, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.43 percent of the residents in 19133 has some form of health insurance. 70.12 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 23.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19133 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,705 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19133. An estimate of 107 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,878 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 102,605 health care providers accessible to residents in 19133, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The following analysis provides a hypothetical 'COPD Score' assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) within the 19133 ZIP code of Philadelphia, and their capacity to manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients. This score considers factors crucial for effective COPD care, including physician availability, practice resources, and access to support services. It is important to note that this is a hypothetical exercise based on publicly available data and general knowledge of healthcare practices.

The foundation of any COPD score begins with assessing primary care availability. In Philadelphia, and specifically within 19133, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A lower ratio, meaning more patients per PCP, can strain resources and potentially limit the time dedicated to each patient, including those with chronic conditions like COPD. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) can provide estimates for physician density in the area. A high physician-to-patient ratio will negatively impact the COPD score.

Further, the availability of primary care is not just about the number of doctors. It also involves examining the types of practices. Are the practices primarily solo practices, group practices, or part of larger healthcare systems? Group practices and those affiliated with larger systems often have more resources, including specialized staff like respiratory therapists, and potentially better access to diagnostic tools and specialized care. The COPD score should reflect this difference. Practices connected to major hospitals in Philadelphia, such as Temple University Hospital or Einstein Medical Center, may have a higher score due to their access to a broader network of specialists and resources.

Telemedicine adoption plays a significant role in COPD management. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education, can enhance access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in underserved areas. The COPD score would consider the availability of telemedicine platforms, the types of services offered virtually, and the ease of access for patients. Practices that have integrated telemedicine into their COPD care protocols would receive a higher score.

Beyond the core medical services, the availability of mental health resources is crucial. COPD can significantly impact mental health, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that have integrated mental health screening and counseling services, either in-house or through referrals, will positively influence the COPD score. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychologists or psychiatrists, and access to support groups specifically for COPD patients are important indicators.

Standout practices within 19133, if identified through public reviews or patient testimonials, would be highlighted. These practices might be recognized for their patient-centered care, their effective communication with patients, or their commitment to providing comprehensive COPD management. The COPD score would reflect these positive aspects. This might involve analyzing online reviews, patient satisfaction surveys, or awards received by the practices.

The assessment of diagnostic capabilities is also important. Practices equipped with spirometry testing, a crucial tool for diagnosing and monitoring COPD, would receive a higher score. The availability of pulmonary function testing (PFT) and access to pulmonologists for consultation are essential for accurate diagnosis and management. Practices with readily available access to these services would be viewed favorably.

Medication management is another critical factor. Practices that employ electronic prescribing systems, which streamline medication refills and reduce errors, would be given a higher score. The ability to educate patients about their medications, including proper inhaler technique and potential side effects, is also essential. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to medication adherence and patient education would be recognized.

The COPD score should also assess practices' commitment to patient education. This includes providing educational materials about COPD, its management, and lifestyle modifications. Practices that offer educational programs, support groups, or access to online resources would be viewed more favorably. This could include resources from organizations like the American Lung Association or the COPD Foundation.

The availability of respiratory therapists is another factor. Respiratory therapists play a vital role in COPD management, providing education, performing pulmonary function tests, and assisting with breathing exercises. Practices that have respiratory therapists on staff or readily available for consultation would receive a higher score.

The analysis would also consider the practice's approach to preventative care, such as influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, which are crucial for COPD patients. Practices that actively promote and provide these vaccinations would be recognized.

Finally, the COPD score would be a composite of all these factors, reflecting the overall capacity of primary care practices in 19133 to provide comprehensive COPD care. It is a dynamic assessment that should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This hypothetical score provides a framework for evaluating the quality of COPD care in a specific geographic area.

While this analysis provides a theoretical framework, visualizing this data and comparing practices across different areas can be difficult. For a more comprehensive understanding of healthcare resources and access, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of physician density, practice locations, and the availability of various healthcare services. Explore the potential of CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of healthcare access in Philadelphia and beyond.