The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 19454, North Wales, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.16 percent of the residents in 19454 has some form of health insurance. 25.46 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 84.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19454 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,107 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 17 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19454. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,081 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 11,301 health care providers accessible to residents in 19454, North Wales, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19454, North Wales, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 91 |
---|---|
People Score | 54 |
Provider Score | 98 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 74 |
19454 | North Wales | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical 'COPD Score' assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) in the 19454 ZIP code, North Wales, Pennsylvania, focusing on factors relevant to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care. This analysis is based on publicly available information and hypothetical data, as a comprehensive real-world COPD Score would require access to patient records and detailed practice-specific information. The focus is on the availability and quality of care for COPD patients.
The 'COPD Score' is a composite measure, incorporating various aspects of care delivery. We assess physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial for effective COPD management. The score aims to provide a snapshot of the local healthcare landscape for COPD patients.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of access to care. A higher ratio, meaning more patients per PCP, can potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced time spent with each patient. In 19454, we would ideally analyze the number of PCPs actively accepting new patients and the estimated population size. Let's assume, for this analysis, that the average PCP-to-patient ratio in the area is slightly higher than the national average, suggesting a potential strain on resources. This would negatively impact the COPD Score, as timely access to care is critical for managing exacerbations and preventing disease progression. A lower ratio, indicating more readily available PCPs, would boost the score.
Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating practices known for their commitment to COPD care. This includes looking for practices that actively participate in COPD-focused clinical trials, have dedicated COPD specialists or nurses, and offer comprehensive pulmonary function testing (PFT) capabilities on-site. Practices that adhere to the latest COPD guidelines, such as those established by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), would also be considered high-performing. Furthermore, practices that demonstrate a strong patient education program, including smoking cessation support, would contribute positively to their score. We would examine online reviews, patient testimonials, and practice websites to identify these standout practices. The presence of such practices would significantly enhance the overall COPD Score for the area.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine allows for remote monitoring of patients, virtual check-ups, and easier access to specialists, especially for those with mobility limitations or living in rural areas. We would assess the availability of telehealth services among PCPs in 19454. Practices offering remote monitoring of vital signs, virtual pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and video consultations would receive higher scores. The degree of integration of telemedicine into routine COPD care would be a key factor. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on the healthcare system, thereby improving the COPD Score.
The integration of mental health resources is crucial for COPD patients. COPD can significantly impact mental health, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that screen for mental health issues, offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals would receive higher scores. Collaboration between PCPs and mental health providers is essential for holistic COPD care. The availability of support groups and educational resources for patients and their families also contributes positively to the score. The ability to address both the physical and mental aspects of the disease is vital for improving the quality of life for COPD patients.
To calculate the overall COPD Score, we would assign weighted values to each factor: physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource integration. The weights would reflect the relative importance of each factor in contributing to quality COPD care. For example, access to care (physician-to-patient ratio) might be weighted more heavily than the availability of telemedicine. The specific weights would be determined based on expert opinion and available evidence. The final score would then be presented on a scale, allowing for a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of COPD care in 19454.
In this hypothetical scenario, the COPD Score for 19454 might be moderately positive. While the presence of some standout practices and the availability of mental health resources might boost the score, a slightly higher physician-to-patient ratio and variable telemedicine adoption could pull it down. The score would also be influenced by the number of PCPs actively accepting new patients and the availability of specialized COPD services in the area.
Analyzing primary care availability in North Wales, more broadly, requires a similar approach but on a larger scale. We would examine the distribution of PCPs across the entire borough, considering factors like geographic accessibility and the availability of specialized services. The presence of hospitals with pulmonary departments and access to respiratory therapists would also be assessed. The overall COPD Score for North Wales would be a reflection of the collective efforts of all healthcare providers in the region.
This analysis is a simplified illustration of a complex assessment. A real-world COPD Score would require more detailed data collection and analysis. The goal is to provide a framework for evaluating the quality of COPD care in a specific geographic area, highlighting areas for improvement and promoting better outcomes for patients.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 19454 and North Wales, including the distribution of PCPs, the location of standout practices, and the availability of telemedicine services, consider exploring the power of interactive mapping. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and informative view of the healthcare resources in your area, allowing you to see the data in a clear and accessible format. Visit CartoChrome maps today to visualize your healthcare options and make informed decisions about your care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like