The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 29123, Pelion, South Carolina is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.14 percent of the residents in 29123 has some form of health insurance. 40.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.14 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29123 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,848 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29123. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 853 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,289 health care providers accessible to residents in 29123, Pelion, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29123, Pelion, South Carolina
COPD Score | 30 |
---|---|
People Score | 23 |
Provider Score | 45 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 38 |
29123 | Pelion | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
COPD, or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, is a significant health concern, particularly in areas with potential environmental risk factors or aging populations. This analysis focuses on evaluating the availability and quality of primary care services for COPD management in Pelion, South Carolina (ZIP code 29123). The goal is to provide a COPD Score, a qualitative assessment of the healthcare landscape for COPD patients, considering physician availability, resource utilization, and the integration of modern healthcare technologies.
The foundation of effective COPD care is a robust primary care system. In Pelion, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to delayed appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potential gaps in preventative care. Conversely, a high ratio suggests better access to care, allowing for more comprehensive evaluations and proactive management of COPD. The analysis will need to determine the current physician-to-patient ratio within the 29123 ZIP code, comparing it to state and national averages to gauge its relative strength. This information will be crucial in determining the overall COPD Score.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is essential. This includes the expertise of the physicians, their experience in treating COPD, and their commitment to evidence-based practices. Identifying standout practices in Pelion is a key aspect of the analysis. These practices might be recognized for their patient-centered approach, their use of advanced diagnostic tools, or their success in achieving positive patient outcomes. Research will need to focus on identifying these practices, evaluating their COPD management protocols, and highlighting any unique features that contribute to their success.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for managing chronic conditions like COPD. It allows patients to access care remotely, reducing the need for frequent office visits, especially beneficial for those with mobility issues or living in geographically isolated areas. The analysis will assess the adoption of telemedicine by primary care providers in Pelion. This includes determining the types of telemedicine services offered, such as virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and medication management support. A high level of telemedicine adoption would positively impact the COPD Score, indicating a more accessible and patient-friendly healthcare environment.
Mental health often intertwines with chronic respiratory illnesses. COPD can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation, significantly impacting a patient's quality of life. The availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referrals is crucial. The analysis will investigate the integration of mental health services in Pelion's primary care practices. This includes assessing whether providers screen for mental health conditions, offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health specialists. A strong emphasis on mental health support would contribute positively to the COPD Score, reflecting a holistic approach to patient care.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. These programs provide education, exercise training, and support to help COPD patients manage their symptoms and improve their lung function. The presence of such programs in or near Pelion is a critical factor in assessing the overall COPD Score. The analysis will identify any pulmonary rehabilitation programs available, evaluate their accessibility, and assess their integration with primary care practices.
The availability of specialized respiratory care is another important factor. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to pulmonologists (specialists in lung diseases) is crucial for complex cases or when advanced interventions are needed. The analysis will determine the proximity of pulmonologists to Pelion and assess the ease with which patients can access their services.
Data collection for this analysis would involve several methods. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) would provide information on physician-to-patient ratios and healthcare facility locations. Direct outreach to primary care practices in Pelion, via phone calls, questionnaires, and website reviews, would gather information on their services, telemedicine adoption, and mental health support. Patient testimonials and online reviews would offer valuable insights into the patient experience and the quality of care provided.
The COPD Score itself would be a qualitative assessment based on the gathered data. It would consider factors such as the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, the presence of pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and the accessibility of specialized respiratory care. The score would be presented as a rating, such as a scale from poor to excellent, with a detailed explanation of the rationale behind the rating. The score would provide a clear picture of the healthcare landscape for COPD patients in Pelion, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.
The final COPD Score would serve as a valuable resource for both patients and healthcare providers. Patients can use the score to make informed decisions about their healthcare choices, while providers can use it to identify areas for improvement and to benchmark their performance against other practices. The analysis would also highlight any unmet needs in the community and provide recommendations for improving COPD care in Pelion.
To visualize and understand the healthcare landscape in Pelion, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a geographical representation of physician locations, healthcare facilities, and resource availability, offering a comprehensive and accessible view of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like