The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 29163, Vance, South Carolina is 5 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.82 percent of the residents in 29163 has some form of health insurance. 59.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 33.21 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29163 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 481 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29163. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 294 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 37 health care providers accessible to residents in 29163, Vance, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29163, Vance, South Carolina
COPD Score | 2 |
---|---|
People Score | 22 |
Provider Score | 5 |
Hospital Score | 33 |
Travel Score | 16 |
29163 | Vance | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Vance, SC (ZIP Code 29163)
This analysis delves into the landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care within ZIP code 29163, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This assessment aims to provide a COPD score ranking, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem in Vance, South Carolina.
Vance, SC, situated within ZIP code 29163, is a rural community. The demographics of the area, which can be found through the Census Bureau, likely include a significant population of older adults, a demographic at increased risk for COPD. Factors such as smoking prevalence and environmental exposures in this region could also contribute to a higher incidence of the disease. Therefore, access to effective primary care, specialized respiratory services, and supportive resources is crucial for managing COPD and improving patient outcomes.
The core of effective COPD management rests on the foundation of accessible primary care. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for individuals experiencing respiratory symptoms. They play a critical role in early diagnosis, disease management, and coordinating care with specialists. A key factor influencing the COPD score is the physician-to-patient ratio. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnosis or inadequate management of COPD. Data from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the U.S. Census Bureau, in combination, would be needed to determine the current physician-to-patient ratio in 29163. A low ratio would negatively impact the COPD score.
Availability of primary care is not just about the number of physicians, but also their geographic distribution and the ease of access for patients. Practices located further from the population center, or those lacking adequate transportation options, can create barriers to care. The operating hours of the practices, including evening and weekend availability, also play a role. Practices offering extended hours or walk-in services improve accessibility and positively impact the COPD score.
Identifying standout practices within 29163 requires a deeper dive into their service offerings and patient outcomes. Practices demonstrating a commitment to COPD management often implement several key strategies. These include comprehensive pulmonary function testing, regular patient education sessions on disease management, and robust medication management protocols. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, track patient outcomes, and consistently achieve positive results should be recognized. Patient reviews and testimonials, available through online platforms, can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and the quality of care provided by different practices.
Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, has the potential to significantly improve COPD care, especially in rural areas like Vance. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to connect with their physicians for consultations, medication management, and symptom monitoring. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and online educational resources, will receive a higher score. The availability of reliable internet access in the area is a crucial factor that can influence the adoption and effectiveness of telemedicine.
The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. Individuals with COPD often experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges due to the chronic nature of the disease, the physical limitations it imposes, and the social isolation it can cause. The integration of mental health resources into COPD care is therefore essential. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care and will receive a higher score. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, also contributes to improved mental well-being and should be considered.
The COPD score for 29163 would also consider the availability of specialized respiratory care. While PCPs are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and other specialists is vital for patients with complex needs. The proximity of specialists, and the ease of referral from primary care practices, significantly impact the quality of care and the overall COPD score.
The availability of resources such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs is another key factor. These programs, which combine exercise, education, and support, can improve lung function, reduce symptoms, and enhance the quality of life for COPD patients. Practices that actively refer patients to pulmonary rehabilitation programs, or that offer these programs on-site, contribute to a higher COPD score.
Finally, the COPD score would consider the overall health literacy of the community. Patients who are well-informed about their disease, medications, and self-management techniques are more likely to adhere to their treatment plans and achieve better outcomes. Practices that actively promote health literacy through patient education materials, workshops, and community outreach programs will receive a higher score.
In conclusion, assessing the COPD score for 29163 requires a comprehensive evaluation of primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and access to specialized respiratory care and support resources. The effectiveness of COPD management depends on the strength of the healthcare ecosystem.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Vance, SC, and to explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, please consider using CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like