COPD Score

29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 29452 has some form of health insurance. 51.47 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.92 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29452 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 53 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29452. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 65 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 450 health care providers accessible to residents in 29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina.

Health Scores in 29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina

COPD Score 17
People Score 34
Provider Score 18
Hospital Score 64
Travel Score 22

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

29452 Jacksonboro South Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina

## COPD Score Analysis: Jacksonboro, SC (ZIP Code 29452)

Analyzing the landscape of COPD care within Jacksonboro, South Carolina (ZIP code 29452) requires a multi-faceted approach. The goal is to assess the availability and quality of care for individuals managing this chronic respiratory disease. This analysis will focus on key factors including physician access, practice characteristics, technology adoption, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial elements in a comprehensive COPD management strategy.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of access. Determining the precise ratio within a specific ZIP code is challenging due to data limitations. However, we can make informed estimates. Examining publicly available data from sources like the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the US Census Bureau, along with information from professional medical directories, allows us to approximate the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists serving the area. This data, combined with population estimates for Jacksonboro, provides a preliminary understanding of the potential patient load per physician. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors, would negatively impact the COPD score, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses, less frequent follow-up appointments, and poorer overall disease management.

Primary care availability is paramount. PCPs are often the first point of contact for individuals experiencing COPD symptoms. Their role in early diagnosis, medication management, and patient education is critical. Assessing the availability of PCPs involves considering factors beyond sheer numbers. The acceptance of new patients, office hours, and the presence of multilingual staff are all relevant. Practices with extended hours, offering evening or weekend appointments, demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience, which can be particularly beneficial for individuals managing a chronic illness. The ability of a practice to communicate effectively with a diverse patient population, including those with limited English proficiency, is also a significant factor in the quality of care.

Identifying standout practices requires delving into the specific characteristics of each clinic. This involves examining factors such as the qualifications and experience of the physicians, the availability of on-site diagnostic equipment (such as spirometry), and the implementation of evidence-based COPD management protocols. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the American Lung Association or the COPD Foundation, often demonstrate a higher commitment to patient care. Patient reviews and testimonials, while subjective, provide valuable insights into the patient experience, including factors like wait times, staff responsiveness, and the overall level of care provided.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly relevant, particularly in rural areas like Jacksonboro. Telemedicine offers several potential benefits for COPD patients. It can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, particularly for routine follow-ups and medication adjustments. This is especially helpful for patients with mobility limitations or those living far from medical facilities. Telemedicine can also facilitate remote monitoring of patients' symptoms, allowing physicians to intervene quickly if a patient's condition deteriorates. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves identifying which practices offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and access to patient portals for communication and information sharing.

The often-overlooked aspect of mental health resources is also crucial. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, is therefore an essential component of comprehensive COPD care. Assessing the availability of these resources involves identifying mental health providers in the area, evaluating their acceptance of insurance, and determining their experience in treating patients with chronic respiratory conditions. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health professionals is ideal, ensuring a holistic approach to patient care.

Specific examples within Jacksonboro are difficult to pinpoint without more in-depth data. However, we can hypothesize based on general trends. If Jacksonboro is a rural community, we might expect a lower physician-to-patient ratio compared to more urban areas. This could indicate a potential access issue. The adoption of telemedicine might be a key differentiator, with practices embracing this technology potentially offering a higher quality of care, particularly for those living in remote areas. Practices that proactively address the mental health needs of their patients, either through in-house services or referrals to external providers, would likely receive a higher COPD score.

The COPD score for Jacksonboro is a dynamic assessment. It is influenced by the constant evolution of medical practices, technological advancements, and the availability of resources. A higher score would reflect a community with ample access to qualified physicians, a commitment to evidence-based COPD management, the integration of telemedicine, and the provision of mental health support. Conversely, a lower score would indicate potential access issues, limited adoption of best practices, and a lack of comprehensive support for patients.

Ultimately, improving the COPD score requires a multi-pronged approach. This includes increasing the number of physicians serving the area, promoting the adoption of telemedicine and other innovative technologies, and fostering collaboration between healthcare providers and mental health professionals. Furthermore, patient education and awareness campaigns are crucial to empower individuals to actively manage their condition and seek timely medical attention.

The analysis provided here is a starting point. A deeper dive into specific practice characteristics, patient outcomes, and community resources is necessary to develop a truly comprehensive COPD score for Jacksonboro. The information gleaned from this analysis can be used to identify areas for improvement and to advocate for policies that support better COPD care in the community.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Jacksonboro, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, we encourage you to explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina

You may also like

29426, Adams Run, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 5.21 Miles

Total Population:

29446, Green Pond, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 8.81 Miles

Total Population:

29449, Hollywood, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 12.64 Miles

Total Population:

29435, Cottageville, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 13.15 Miles

Total Population:

29470, Ravenel, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 13.67 Miles

Total Population:

29474, Round O, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 14.60 Miles

Total Population:

29488, Walterboro, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 15.41 Miles

Total Population:

29487, Wadmalaw Island, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 17.58 Miles

Total Population:

29438, Edisto Island, South Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 29452: 18.40 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 29452, Jacksonboro, South Carolina