The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 29664, Mountain Rest, South Carolina is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.03 percent of the residents in 29664 has some form of health insurance. 47.19 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.45 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29664 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 432 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29664. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 498 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 855 health care providers accessible to residents in 29664, Mountain Rest, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29664, Mountain Rest, South Carolina
COPD Score | 16 |
---|---|
People Score | 43 |
Provider Score | 16 |
Hospital Score | 37 |
Travel Score | 41 |
29664 | Mountain Rest | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**COPD Score Analysis: Doctors and Primary Care in Mountain Rest, SC (ZIP Code 29664)**
The assessment of COPD care within the Mountain Rest, South Carolina, ZIP code 29664, requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not only the number of physicians but also the accessibility, quality, and breadth of services available to patients. This analysis will delve into the current state of primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, culminating in a synthesized "COPD Score" for the region.
The foundation of COPD care rests heavily on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Mountain Rest, a rural area, the density of PCPs is likely a significant factor. Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. A high ratio (fewer physicians per capita) can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. The data on the number of PCPs actively practicing within the 29664 ZIP code, combined with the estimated population, will provide a baseline understanding of access. This analysis should consider both the number of physicians and the geographic distribution of their practices, as travel distances can be a major barrier to care in rural settings.
Identifying standout practices is essential. These practices may demonstrate best practices in COPD management, such as comprehensive pulmonary function testing, patient education programs, and coordinated care with pulmonologists and respiratory therapists. The presence of certified respiratory therapists (RRTs) within a practice is a strong indicator of a commitment to respiratory care. Furthermore, an evaluation of the practice's experience with COPD patients, including their use of evidence-based guidelines and patient outcomes, will differentiate the higher-performing practices.
Telemedicine has emerged as a critical tool for expanding healthcare access, especially in rural areas. Its adoption within the 29664 ZIP code is a key factor. Practices utilizing telemedicine platforms for virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and medication management can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of travel. Evaluating the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of use for patients, and the integration with existing electronic health records (EHRs) will determine the level of telemedicine adoption.
Mental health is often overlooked in COPD care, yet it plays a vital role in patient well-being and disease management. COPD can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Assessing the availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referrals into their COPD care protocols demonstrate a more holistic approach. The presence of integrated behavioral health services within primary care practices, or the availability of referrals to nearby mental health providers, directly impacts the COPD Score.
In addition to the above, the availability of specialized care, such as pulmonologists and respiratory therapists, must be considered. While the focus is on primary care, the proximity to specialists and the ease of referral pathways are essential for comprehensive COPD management. The presence of a local hospital or clinic with respiratory care services also contributes to the overall score.
Calculating the COPD Score involves assigning weights to each of the factors discussed above. Physician-to-patient ratio and access to primary care will likely carry the greatest weight. The presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources will contribute to the overall score. The score will be a composite metric, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of COPD care within the 29664 ZIP code.
The final COPD Score will provide a valuable snapshot of the healthcare landscape in Mountain Rest. It will highlight areas of strength and areas needing improvement. For example, a low physician-to-patient ratio coupled with limited telemedicine adoption would negatively impact the score. Conversely, a practice with a dedicated respiratory therapy team and integrated mental health services would significantly boost the score.
The evaluation will also include an assessment of patient satisfaction. Patient feedback, obtained through surveys or online reviews, can provide valuable insights into the patient experience. This data can be used to refine the COPD Score and identify areas where improvements are needed.
The analysis will also consider the impact of social determinants of health. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and housing conditions can significantly influence COPD outcomes. The COPD Score will be adjusted to account for these factors, providing a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment of the healthcare landscape.
The COPD Score is not simply a number; it is a tool for understanding the challenges and opportunities in COPD care within the 29664 ZIP code. It can be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations to improve access to care, enhance the quality of services, and ultimately improve the lives of COPD patients.
The process of compiling the data for this assessment involves several steps. First, a comprehensive search of online databases, such as the South Carolina Medical Association website and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provider directory, is required to identify all practicing physicians in the 29664 ZIP code. Second, data on practice characteristics, such as telemedicine adoption and mental health resources, must be gathered. This may involve contacting practices directly or reviewing publicly available information. Third, patient satisfaction data must be collected.
The COPD Score is a dynamic metric. It should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. As new practices open, telemedicine platforms evolve, and mental health resources become available, the score will be adjusted to reflect these changes.
The goal is to provide a clear and concise assessment of COPD care in Mountain Rest. This analysis will contribute to a better understanding of the needs of COPD patients and support efforts to improve their health outcomes.
To visualize and further analyze the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including the location of primary care physicians, specialists, and mental health services, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides powerful mapping tools to overlay healthcare data with demographic information, allowing for a deeper understanding of access to care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like