The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 25611, Bruno, West Virginia is 57 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.06 percent of the residents in 25611 has some form of health insurance. 69.48 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 30.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25611 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 344 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25611. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 236 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 543 health care providers accessible to residents in 25611, Bruno, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25611, Bruno, West Virginia
COPD Score | 55 |
---|---|
People Score | 81 |
Provider Score | 57 |
Hospital Score | 40 |
Travel Score | 21 |
25611 | Bruno | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25611 & Primary Care in Bruno
This analysis assesses the availability and quality of primary care resources within the context of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management in ZIP Code 25611, focusing on the town of Bruno, West Virginia. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, ultimately aiming to provide a COPD Score assessment.
The foundation of a COPD Score begins with understanding the population's needs. ZIP Code 25611, encompassing Bruno and surrounding areas, likely faces a higher prevalence of COPD due to factors such as a history of coal mining, smoking rates, and potential environmental exposures. This inherent risk necessitates a robust primary care infrastructure capable of early diagnosis, effective treatment, and ongoing management of the disease.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to appointment delays, reduced access to care, and potential exacerbations of COPD symptoms. Publicly available data sources, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can provide estimates of physician density in the area. A low ratio would negatively impact the COPD Score, suggesting a greater strain on existing resources. The analysis must investigate the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) actively accepting new patients in the area.
The characteristics of primary care practices within ZIP Code 25611 are also crucial. The analysis will consider the presence of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with a demonstrated interest in COPD care. Practices offering specialized services like pulmonary function testing (PFTs) and readily accessible spirometry are highly desirable. The availability of on-site respiratory therapists for patient education and support significantly enhances the COPD Score. Practices with established care pathways for COPD, including regular follow-up appointments and medication management protocols, will receive higher scores.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important in rural areas like Bruno. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, enabling patients to access care remotely, particularly for routine follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and patient education. Practices utilizing telehealth platforms for COPD management will score favorably. The analysis will examine the types of telemedicine services offered, including video consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and patient education resources. The availability of telehealth services can dramatically improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas.
The often-overlooked integration of mental health resources is a vital component of COPD management. COPD can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals will receive higher scores. The analysis will investigate the availability of these services, including counseling, support groups, and access to psychiatric care. Addressing the psychological aspects of COPD is crucial for improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Identifying standout practices within ZIP Code 25611 is essential. These practices often serve as models for best practices in COPD care. The analysis will seek to identify practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive COPD management, including early diagnosis, aggressive treatment, patient education, and proactive monitoring. The analysis will consider patient satisfaction scores, if available, and assess the practice's involvement in community outreach and education programs related to COPD. These practices often champion innovative approaches to care delivery, such as patient-centered medical homes.
The analysis will also consider the availability of community resources for COPD patients. This includes access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs, support groups, and smoking cessation programs. The presence of these resources indicates a supportive environment for patients and contributes positively to the COPD Score. The analysis will investigate the accessibility of these resources and the level of collaboration between primary care practices and community organizations.
The COPD Score will be a composite measure, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of primary care resources for COPD patients in ZIP Code 25611. The score will be based on the physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, the integration of mental health resources, and the availability of community support. The higher the score, the better equipped the area is to provide high-quality COPD care. A low score would indicate areas needing improvement, such as recruiting more physicians, expanding telehealth services, or increasing mental health support.
In conclusion, the COPD Score analysis provides a valuable assessment of the primary care landscape in Bruno and surrounding areas. It identifies strengths and weaknesses in the healthcare system, highlighting areas for improvement. By understanding the availability of resources and the quality of care, healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members can work together to improve the lives of COPD patients in ZIP Code 25611.
For a visual representation of the data and a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. CartoChrome provides valuable insights that can help healthcare providers and patients navigate the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like