The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 35094, Leeds, Alabama is 94 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.45 percent of the residents in 35094 has some form of health insurance. 33.55 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.35 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35094 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,003 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35094. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,530 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,614 health care providers accessible to residents in 35094, Leeds, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35094, Leeds, Alabama
Hypertension Score | 73 |
---|---|
People Score | 49 |
Provider Score | 94 |
Hospital Score | 29 |
Travel Score | 54 |
35094 | Leeds | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of hypertension management within ZIP code 35094, encompassing the city of Leeds, Alabama, requires a multifaceted approach. We'll evaluate primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components in managing hypertension effectively. This assessment will provide a “Hypertension Score” framework, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of healthcare delivery in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of effective hypertension control lies in accessible primary care. Leeds, like many communities, faces challenges in this regard. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. A high ratio, meaning a large number of patients per primary care physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent per patient, and potentially, a less comprehensive approach to hypertension management. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can provide estimates of these ratios, allowing for a preliminary assessment. However, these figures often represent averages and may not accurately reflect the realities of individual practices or patient experiences.
Standout practices in Leeds would ideally demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive hypertension care. This includes proactive screening programs, patient education initiatives, and the consistent application of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Practices that actively monitor patient blood pressure, provide lifestyle counseling (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), and titrate medications according to established protocols deserve recognition. Furthermore, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) allows for efficient data tracking and improved communication between healthcare providers. Identifying these practices requires direct observation, patient surveys, and reviews of practice websites and promotional materials.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management via online portals, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially reach a wider patient population and provide more frequent monitoring, leading to better blood pressure control. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves examining the availability of virtual appointment options, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the integration of telemedicine platforms with existing EHR systems.
The often-overlooked link between mental health and hypertension is crucial. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is a vital component of comprehensive hypertension management. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Practices that offer integrated behavioral health services or have established referral pathways to mental health providers are better positioned to address the holistic needs of their patients. Evaluating mental health resources involves investigating the availability of mental health professionals, the presence of mental health programs, and the integration of mental health services with primary care.
The “Hypertension Score” for Leeds, 35094, would be a composite measure, reflecting the performance across these key areas. A higher score would indicate better access to care, more proactive management strategies, greater telemedicine adoption, and stronger integration of mental health resources. This score would not be a single number but rather a series of sub-scores, each representing a specific aspect of hypertension management. For example, a “Physician Access Score” would reflect the physician-to-patient ratio, appointment wait times, and the availability of same-day appointments. A “Practice Performance Score” would assess the implementation of evidence-based guidelines, patient education efforts, and the use of EHRs. A “Telemedicine Integration Score” would measure the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring options, and the integration of telemedicine platforms. Finally, a “Mental Health Integration Score” would evaluate the availability of mental health services and the integration of these services with primary care.
The process of creating this “Hypertension Score” requires data collection from various sources. This includes public health data, practice websites, patient surveys, and direct observation. The data would then be analyzed and weighted to generate the sub-scores and the overall “Hypertension Score.” It's important to acknowledge that this score is a snapshot in time and needs to be updated regularly to reflect changes in healthcare delivery.
The analysis reveals that improving primary care access, enhancing telemedicine capabilities, and integrating mental health services are crucial areas for improvement in Leeds, 35094. Addressing these challenges will contribute to better hypertension control and, ultimately, improved patient outcomes. The success of these initiatives depends on the collaboration of healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government agencies.
To visualize the spatial distribution of these healthcare resources, and gain a deeper understanding of the geographic disparities in access to care, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps allow for the overlaying of various datasets, providing a visual representation of the "Hypertension Score" factors, such as the location of primary care practices, the availability of telemedicine services, and the proximity to mental health resources. This visual representation can help identify areas with the greatest need and inform targeted interventions.
Explore the power of data visualization. Visit CartoChrome maps today to understand the health landscape of Leeds, 35094, and other communities.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like