The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 35097, Locust Fork, Alabama is 33 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.79 percent of the residents in 35097 has some form of health insurance. 46.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.60 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35097 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 384 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35097. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 341 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 645 health care providers accessible to residents in 35097, Locust Fork, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35097, Locust Fork, Alabama
Hypertension Score | 11 |
---|---|
People Score | 36 |
Provider Score | 33 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 24 |
35097 | Locust Fork | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Hypertension Score Analysis: Locust Fork, Alabama (ZIP Code 35097)**
Understanding the landscape of hypertension management in Locust Fork, Alabama (ZIP Code 35097) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, their approaches to hypertension management, the utilization of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. We will then formulate a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" to assess the overall quality of care. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and ultimately, offering insights for improving community health.
The foundation of effective hypertension control rests on accessible primary care. In Locust Fork, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial factor. This ratio, the number of physicians per 1,000 residents, directly impacts appointment availability and the ability of patients to establish consistent care. A low ratio can lead to longer wait times, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment initiation. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater access and potentially better outcomes. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services or the Alabama Department of Public Health would be necessary to determine the exact ratio for this specific ZIP code. However, we can assume, based on the rural nature of the area, that the ratio might be lower than the national average.
Within Locust Fork, identifying standout primary care practices requires examining several key indicators. These include the practice’s commitment to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management, such as those established by the American Heart Association or the American College of Cardiology. Are physicians routinely screening patients for hypertension? Are they utilizing the latest medications and lifestyle interventions? Do they offer patient education materials and support groups? Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those recognized by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), often demonstrate a higher level of care.
Telemedicine offers a promising avenue for improving hypertension management, especially in rural areas where geographical barriers to care are prevalent. The adoption of telemedicine by local physicians can significantly enhance patient access to care. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management, which can be particularly beneficial for patients with chronic conditions like hypertension. It also reduces the need for frequent in-person visits, saving patients time and travel expenses. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption involves determining which practices offer virtual appointments, remote monitoring capabilities, and secure patient portals for communication.
The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is undeniable, especially in the context of hypertension. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources into primary care is crucial. Practices that offer on-site mental health professionals or have established referral networks with local therapists and psychiatrists are better equipped to address the psychological factors contributing to hypertension. The availability of these resources can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and overall well-being.
Creating a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" for Locust Fork requires assigning weights to each of the factors discussed. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio could account for 20% of the score, reflecting its importance in access to care. The quality of care provided by individual practices, including adherence to guidelines, patient education, and quality improvement initiatives, could contribute 30%. Telemedicine adoption could be weighted at 25%, recognizing its potential to improve access and convenience. Finally, the integration of mental health resources could account for 25%, highlighting the critical link between mental and physical health. The score would be calculated by assessing each factor and assigning a numerical value based on the available data. The final score would then reflect the overall quality of hypertension management in the community.
For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is low, it would receive a lower score. Practices with robust hypertension management protocols and a commitment to quality improvement would receive higher scores in the quality of care category. Practices with comprehensive telemedicine offerings would score higher in the telemedicine adoption category. And practices with integrated mental health resources would score higher in the mental health integration category.
Based on this hypothetical scoring system, a community with a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and few mental health resources would receive a lower overall score. Conversely, a community with a high physician-to-patient ratio, widespread telemedicine adoption, and integrated mental health services would receive a higher score.
The impact of these factors on patient outcomes is significant. Patients with better access to care, comprehensive management plans, and support for their mental health are more likely to achieve optimal blood pressure control. This, in turn, reduces the risk of serious complications such as heart attack, stroke, and kidney failure.
To gain a more granular understanding of the healthcare landscape in Locust Fork, and to visualize the distribution of resources, access to data is paramount. This analysis is, of course, limited by the lack of specific data.
To further explore this data, we encourage you to explore the power of visual analytics. **CartoChrome maps** offer a dynamic way to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas of need, and track progress over time. By using CartoChrome, you can gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Locust Fork and make informed decisions to improve community health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like