The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 35584, Sipsey, Alabama is 27 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.37 percent of the residents in 35584 has some form of health insurance. 67.56 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 46.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35584 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 76 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35584. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 48 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 57 health care providers accessible to residents in 35584, Sipsey, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35584, Sipsey, Alabama
Hypertension Score | 11 |
---|---|
People Score | 43 |
Provider Score | 27 |
Hospital Score | 40 |
Travel Score | 12 |
35584 | Sipsey | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 35584 & Primary Care in Sipsey
Analyzing healthcare access and quality, especially concerning a prevalent condition like hypertension, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP code 35584, encompassing the town of Sipsey, Alabama, to provide a 'Hypertension Score' assessment. The score, though not a numerical value here, will represent a qualitative understanding of the resources available for managing hypertension within this specific geographic area.
The foundation of hypertension management relies heavily on accessible primary care. Assessing primary care availability in Sipsey (ZIP code 35584) begins with evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric provides a baseline understanding of the potential burden on existing primary care providers. Unfortunately, specific, real-time physician-to-patient ratios for a small town like Sipsey are often difficult to obtain. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), might offer county-level information, which could be used as a proxy, but it would not be specific to Sipsey. The analysis must, therefore, rely on a combination of publicly available data, local knowledge if possible, and assumptions based on broader regional trends. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, would negatively impact the Hypertension Score.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality and scope of primary care services are crucial. Are there practices that stand out in their approach to hypertension management? Identifying these "standout practices" necessitates examining factors like patient reviews, the availability of specialized equipment for monitoring blood pressure (e.g., ambulatory blood pressure monitoring), and the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment. Does the practice employ a multidisciplinary team, including nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists, to provide comprehensive care? Practices integrating these elements would contribute positively to the Hypertension Score.
Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role in healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas like Sipsey. Telemedicine can improve access to care by reducing the need for travel, which can be a significant barrier for patients, especially those with mobility issues or limited transportation options. The availability of telehealth consultations for hypertension management, including medication management and lifestyle counseling, would significantly enhance the Hypertension Score. Practices that offer virtual appointments, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals would be considered more favorably.
The relationship between hypertension and mental health is well-established. Chronic stress and mental health conditions like anxiety and depression can exacerbate hypertension. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of a comprehensive hypertension management strategy. This analysis must consider the presence of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, within or near Sipsey. Are there readily available referrals to mental health services? Practices that integrate mental health support into their hypertension care plans would receive a higher score. This could involve screening for mental health conditions, providing on-site mental health services, or collaborating with mental health providers in the community.
Furthermore, the availability of educational resources for patients is vital. Are there patient education materials on hypertension, its causes, and its management? Does the practice offer group classes or individual counseling sessions on topics such as diet, exercise, and stress management? Practices that prioritize patient education and empower patients to actively participate in their care would positively impact the Hypertension Score.
Another factor to consider is the accessibility of pharmacies and medication affordability. Are there pharmacies within a reasonable distance of Sipsey? Are generic medications readily available and affordable? The presence of pharmacy services and programs that assist patients with medication costs, such as patient assistance programs, would contribute to a higher score.
The impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) should not be overlooked. SDOH, such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, and safe housing, can significantly influence hypertension outcomes. While a detailed analysis of SDOH within Sipsey is beyond the scope of this assessment, it is important to acknowledge their influence. Practices that are aware of SDOH and address them through referrals to social services, community outreach programs, or other initiatives would be recognized for their efforts.
The geographic distribution of healthcare providers is also a key factor. Are primary care physicians and specialists evenly distributed throughout the area, or are there geographic disparities in access to care? The presence of a hospital or clinic within Sipsey or nearby would be a significant advantage. The proximity of specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists, is also crucial for patients with complex hypertension cases.
Finally, the overall quality of care should be assessed. This includes factors like the use of electronic health records (EHRs), the implementation of quality improvement initiatives, and patient satisfaction levels. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to quality improvement and patient-centered care would contribute positively to the Hypertension Score.
In conclusion, the Hypertension Score for doctors in ZIP code 35584 and primary care availability in Sipsey is influenced by a complex interplay of factors. These include the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality and scope of primary care services, telemedicine adoption, the availability of mental health resources, patient education, pharmacy accessibility, the consideration of social determinants of health, the geographic distribution of healthcare providers, and the overall quality of care. A comprehensive assessment would require a detailed investigation of each of these elements.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources in Sipsey (ZIP code 35584) and surrounding areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you identify areas with limited access to care, visualize the location of healthcare providers, and analyze other relevant geographic data.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like