The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 35904, Gadsden, Alabama is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 81.96 percent of the residents in 35904 has some form of health insurance. 42.50 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35904 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,086 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35904. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,707 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,632 health care providers accessible to residents in 35904, Gadsden, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35904, Gadsden, Alabama
Hypertension Score | 10 |
---|---|
People Score | 10 |
Provider Score | 48 |
Hospital Score | 19 |
Travel Score | 42 |
35904 | Gadsden | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: 35904 & Primary Care in Gadsden
Analyzing hypertension management within ZIP code 35904 and the broader primary care landscape of Gadsden, Alabama, requires a multifaceted approach. We need to evaluate several key areas: physician availability, quality of care indicators, access to resources, and the integration of modern technologies. This analysis will culminate in a hypothetical “Hypertension Score,” providing a relative assessment of the area's strengths and weaknesses in managing this prevalent health condition.
The cornerstone of effective hypertension management is access to primary care physicians (PCPs). The physician-to-patient ratio in Gadsden, and specifically within 35904, is a crucial starting point. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), would be used to determine the number of active PCPs practicing within the area. This data is then compared to the population size of 35904 to calculate a ratio. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of PCPs relative to the population, is a significant negative factor in our Hypertension Score. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access and a more favorable score.
Beyond raw numbers, the type and quality of available primary care are vital. We need to assess the presence of board-certified internal medicine physicians, family medicine doctors, and geriatricians. Furthermore, an evaluation of patient satisfaction scores, as reported by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) or through patient reviews, is essential. Practices with consistently high patient satisfaction and positive outcomes, particularly regarding hypertension control rates (e.g., percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure), will receive higher marks in our analysis.
Several practices within Gadsden may stand out. For example, a clinic known for its proactive approach to hypertension management, perhaps through comprehensive patient education programs, regular blood pressure monitoring, and readily available medication management, would be highly regarded. Conversely, practices with a history of long wait times for appointments, limited after-hours care, or a lack of specialized resources for managing complex cases would receive a lower score.
The integration of technology plays a critical role in modern hypertension management. Telemedicine adoption is a key area of evaluation. Practices offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and digital patient portals for communication and medication refills will be viewed favorably. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas, thereby contributing positively to the Hypertension Score. The ease of use and patient satisfaction with these technologies are also crucial factors.
Another vital component of effective hypertension management is the availability of mental health resources. Stress, anxiety, and depression are known contributors to elevated blood pressure. Therefore, the presence of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the primary care setting or readily accessible through referrals, is a significant positive factor. Practices that actively screen for mental health issues and provide integrated care will be highly valued.
Furthermore, the availability of support groups, educational materials, and community resources focused on healthy lifestyles (e.g., nutrition counseling, exercise programs) contributes to a higher score. These resources empower patients to take an active role in managing their condition.
The "Hypertension Score" itself would be a composite metric, weighing the factors discussed above. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, patient satisfaction scores, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of supportive community programs. Each factor would be assigned a weighted value based on its relative importance in hypertension management. The final score would provide a relative ranking of the area's ability to effectively manage hypertension.
For example, a hypothetical practice scoring high on patient satisfaction, offering robust telemedicine options, and having a strong referral network for mental health services would receive a higher score. Conversely, a practice with limited physician availability, long wait times, and a lack of technological integration would receive a lower score.
The overall analysis would also consider the demographic makeup of the population within 35904. Factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and racial/ethnic composition can influence the prevalence and management of hypertension. The analysis would account for these demographic factors to provide a more nuanced and accurate assessment.
In conclusion, assessing hypertension management in ZIP code 35904 and the primary care landscape of Gadsden requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician availability, quality of care, technological integration, and access to support resources. The "Hypertension Score" is a valuable tool for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the area's healthcare system in managing this critical health condition.
Are you interested in visualizing this data and gaining a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Gadsden and surrounding areas? Explore the power of geospatial analysis with CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like