The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 35975, Groveoak, Alabama is 31 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.83 percent of the residents in 35975 has some form of health insurance. 36.45 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.53 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35975 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 312 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35975. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 249 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,893 health care providers accessible to residents in 35975, Groveoak, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35975, Groveoak, Alabama
Hypertension Score | 40 |
---|---|
People Score | 71 |
Provider Score | 31 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 47 |
35975 | Groveoak | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Groveoak, Alabama (ZIP Code 35975)
Analyzing the hypertension landscape within Groveoak, Alabama (ZIP code 35975) requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not just the number of physicians but also the quality of care, access to resources, and the integration of modern technologies. This analysis aims to provide a 'Hypertension Score' assessment, evaluating the availability and effectiveness of care for individuals managing this prevalent condition.
The foundation of effective hypertension management rests on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Groveoak, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of PCPs, can lead to delayed appointments, reduced preventative care, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes for individuals with hypertension. Researching the exact ratio within the specific ZIP code is essential. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or the Alabama Department of Public Health can provide this crucial baseline. The score would be negatively impacted by a low ratio, and positively impacted by a higher ratio.
Beyond simple numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the area is important. Are the physicians concentrated in a single clinic, or are they spread out, providing better access for residents across the entire ZIP code? Geographic accessibility plays a significant role, especially for elderly patients or those with limited transportation options. The proximity of clinics to residential areas, public transportation routes, and pharmacies is a key component of the 'Hypertension Score.'
Within the existing primary care landscape, identifying standout practices is crucial. These practices might demonstrate superior patient outcomes, proactive hypertension management protocols, or a commitment to patient education. This could involve analyzing patient reviews, examining the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for tracking blood pressure readings, and evaluating the availability of patient education materials on topics such as diet, exercise, and medication adherence. Practices with dedicated hypertension management programs, including nurse-led interventions or specialized clinics, would receive higher scores.
Telemedicine adoption is another significant factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management through telehealth platforms can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and online patient portals, would score favorably. This technology can improve patient convenience, and potentially improve adherence to treatment plans.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical in hypertension management. Chronic stress and anxiety can contribute to elevated blood pressure. Access to mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, is therefore an essential component of comprehensive care. Practices that collaborate with mental health professionals, offer on-site counseling, or provide referrals to mental health services would receive a higher score. The availability of these resources directly impacts the overall 'Hypertension Score.'
The quality of care extends to the integration of evidence-based guidelines and best practices. Practices should adhere to established guidelines for hypertension diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care, as recommended by organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). This includes the use of appropriate medications, regular blood pressure monitoring, and lifestyle counseling. Practices that consistently meet these standards would be recognized in the 'Hypertension Score.'
The availability of supporting services, such as registered dietitians, certified diabetes educators, and exercise specialists, can also significantly impact the effectiveness of hypertension management. These professionals can provide patients with personalized guidance on diet, exercise, and lifestyle modifications, which are crucial components of controlling blood pressure. Practices that offer access to these supporting services would receive a higher score.
Patient education and engagement are critical components of successful hypertension management. Practices that prioritize patient education, providing clear and concise information about hypertension, its management, and potential complications, would be recognized. This includes offering educational materials, conducting group classes, and encouraging patient self-monitoring. The level of patient engagement, as measured by patient satisfaction surveys and adherence to treatment plans, also plays a role.
The 'Hypertension Score' should also consider the cost of care. The affordability of medications, the availability of financial assistance programs, and the acceptance of various insurance plans are all important factors. Practices that are transparent about their pricing and offer affordable care options would be viewed favorably.
Finally, the 'Hypertension Score' is not static. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, including the addition of new physicians, the adoption of new technologies, and the implementation of new programs. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that the 'Hypertension Score' accurately reflects the quality and accessibility of hypertension care in Groveoak.
The analysis above provides a framework for assessing the hypertension landscape in Groveoak, Alabama. The 'Hypertension Score' is a composite measure, weighing the various factors discussed above. It is a dynamic measure, reflecting the evolving healthcare environment.
To gain a deeper understanding of the spatial distribution of primary care physicians, their proximity to residents, and the availability of resources in Groveoak, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, allowing you to identify areas with limited access to care and to visualize the geographic distribution of resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like