The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 36020, Coosada, Alabama is 61 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.85 percent of the residents in 36020 has some form of health insurance. 50.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.90 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36020 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 248 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36020. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 211 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 859 health care providers accessible to residents in 36020, Coosada, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36020, Coosada, Alabama
Hypertension Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 55 |
Provider Score | 61 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 51 |
36020 | Coosada | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36020 and Primary Care Availability in Coosada
Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care, specifically concerning hypertension management, within ZIP code 36020 (Coosada, Alabama) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and assess the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components of effective hypertension care. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive “Hypertension Score” assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A low ratio, indicating a higher number of patients per physician, can strain resources and potentially limit the time doctors can dedicate to each patient. While precise, real-time data on this ratio is dynamic and difficult to obtain without specific access to protected health information, publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Alabama Department of Public Health can provide estimates. These estimates, however, should be considered just that, estimates. The actual ratio will vary based on several factors, including the types of practices, the acceptance of new patients, and the prevalence of chronic conditions within the population. A higher ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses or inadequate follow-up care for hypertension.
Identifying standout practices is essential for understanding the quality of care available. This requires evaluating several factors. First, the practice’s patient reviews are important. Online platforms like Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google Reviews can provide insights into patient satisfaction, wait times, and the overall patient experience. Second, the practice's adherence to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management is critical. This includes the use of current guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care. Third, the practice’s use of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals can improve care coordination and patient engagement. EHRs facilitate data tracking, medication management, and communication. Patient portals empower individuals to access their health information, schedule appointments, and communicate with their providers. Practices that demonstrate excellence in these areas should be recognized as leaders in hypertension care.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to access care remotely, overcoming geographical barriers and improving access to specialists. For hypertension management, telemedicine can be used for virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of blood pressure. The level of telemedicine adoption within ZIP code 36020 should be assessed. This includes determining the number of practices offering telemedicine services, the types of services offered, and the technology used. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care to patients with hypertension, especially those with mobility issues or who live in remote areas.
The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and make it more difficult to manage hypertension. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive hypertension care. This analysis should evaluate the availability of mental health providers, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the community. It should also assess whether primary care practices offer integrated mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health providers. Practices that recognize the importance of mental health and integrate it into their hypertension management strategies are likely to provide better overall care.
The “Hypertension Score” will be a composite measure, reflecting the findings across all the key areas. The score will be based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. The physician-to-patient ratio will be weighted based on the estimated ratio for the area. The evaluation of standout practices will be based on patient reviews, adherence to guidelines, and the use of EHRs and patient portals. Telemedicine adoption will be assessed based on the number of practices offering telemedicine services and the types of services offered. The availability of mental health resources will be evaluated based on the number of providers and the integration of mental health services into primary care. The final score will provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of hypertension care within ZIP code 36020.
For instance, a high physician-to-patient ratio would negatively impact the score. Practices with consistently positive patient reviews and strong adherence to hypertension guidelines would positively influence the score. Widespread telemedicine adoption and the availability of integrated mental health services would also contribute to a higher score. Conversely, a lack of telemedicine options and limited access to mental health resources would lower the score.
The analysis of primary care availability in Coosada, Alabama, reveals a complex picture. The physician-to-patient ratio, while not definitive, suggests potential challenges in accessing timely care. The identification of standout practices is crucial, and those practices should be commended for their commitment to quality care. The adoption of telemedicine and the availability of mental health resources are key areas for improvement. The “Hypertension Score” will provide a valuable tool for understanding the overall quality of care available and identifying areas where resources should be directed to improve the health of the community.
This assessment is a snapshot in time. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. New practices may open, existing practices may improve their services, and telemedicine adoption may increase. Regular updates to this analysis are essential to ensure that the “Hypertension Score” remains accurate and relevant. The data used should be refreshed frequently.
The “Hypertension Score” is not just about numbers; it is about the health and well-being of the people in Coosada. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, we can work together to improve the quality of care and ensure that everyone has access to the resources they need to manage their hypertension effectively. This is a continuous process of evaluation and improvement.
To gain a more visual and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Coosada and the surrounding areas, including the location of practices, the availability of resources, and the distribution of patient populations, explore the power of geospatial data with CartoChrome maps. Click here to explore the possibilities.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like