The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 36269, Muscadine, Alabama is 64 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 85.05 percent of the residents in 36269 has some form of health insurance. 31.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36269 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 514 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36269. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 220 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 50 health care providers accessible to residents in 36269, Muscadine, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36269, Muscadine, Alabama
Hypertension Score | 65 |
---|---|
People Score | 80 |
Provider Score | 64 |
Hospital Score | 40 |
Travel Score | 29 |
36269 | Muscadine | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: ZIP Code 36269 and Primary Care in Muscadine
This analysis evaluates the landscape of primary care and hypertension management within ZIP code 36269, encompassing Muscadine, Alabama, focusing on factors influencing a "Hypertension Score" – a composite metric reflecting the availability, quality, and accessibility of care for individuals managing high blood pressure. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine utilization, and integration of mental health resources, all crucial elements in effectively addressing hypertension.
The foundation of a strong Hypertension Score lies in the availability of primary care physicians. ZIP code 36269, a predominantly rural area, likely faces challenges common to such regions: a potentially lower physician-to-patient ratio compared to urban centers. This ratio directly impacts access; a higher ratio (fewer physicians per capita) can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and ultimately, decreased opportunities for proactive hypertension management. Accurate data on the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 36269 is crucial for a precise assessment. This data point, ideally sourced from the US Census Bureau and the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners, serves as a baseline for understanding the overall capacity to provide care.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care practices significantly influences the Hypertension Score. Practices demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based hypertension management protocols, such as those recommended by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, would naturally contribute positively. This includes the consistent use of blood pressure monitoring, regular screenings for cardiovascular risk factors, and the implementation of lifestyle interventions (dietary counseling, exercise recommendations). Practices employing electronic health records (EHRs) with built-in hypertension management tools, such as automated alerts for elevated readings and medication reminders, demonstrate a commitment to proactive and efficient care delivery. Practices that participate in quality improvement initiatives focused on hypertension control would also be highly valued.
Telemedicine adoption presents a significant opportunity to improve the Hypertension Score, particularly in a rural setting like Muscadine. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access care remotely, reducing the need for travel and minimizing time off work. This is especially relevant for follow-up appointments, medication management, and lifestyle counseling, all crucial components of hypertension control. The availability of telehealth services for blood pressure monitoring, remote patient monitoring devices, and virtual consultations with specialists (cardiologists, endocrinologists) would significantly boost the score. The success of telemedicine, however, hinges on several factors: reliable internet access for patients, physician training in telehealth protocols, and patient comfort with technology.
The integration of mental health resources is another critical element influencing the Hypertension Score. The relationship between mental health and hypertension is well-established; stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Primary care practices that offer or facilitate access to mental health services, such as counseling, therapy, and medication management, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. This could involve on-site mental health professionals, partnerships with local mental health providers, or the use of telehealth platforms for mental health consultations. Practices that screen patients for mental health conditions as part of their routine hypertension management protocols also contribute positively.
Standout practices within 36269, if any, would be those excelling in several key areas. A practice demonstrating a high physician-to-patient ratio, coupled with a strong emphasis on evidence-based hypertension management protocols, would be highly rated. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine to improve patient access and convenience would also be considered leaders. Furthermore, practices that have integrated mental health resources into their care model, recognizing the critical link between mental well-being and cardiovascular health, would stand out. The specific names of these practices, and their individual strengths, would need to be identified through local research and data collection.
Assessing the Hypertension Score requires a multi-faceted approach. Data collection on physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration is essential. This data can be gathered from various sources: the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners, local healthcare providers, insurance companies, and patient surveys. Analyzing this data allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the current state of hypertension management within 36269.
The overall goal is to identify areas for improvement. If the physician-to-patient ratio is low, efforts to recruit and retain physicians are needed. If telemedicine adoption is limited, resources and training should be provided to encourage its use. If mental health resources are lacking, partnerships with local mental health providers should be established. The Hypertension Score serves as a roadmap for improving care and ultimately, improving the health outcomes of individuals in Muscadine and the surrounding areas.
This analysis provides a framework for understanding the factors influencing the Hypertension Score in ZIP code 36269. Further research, including direct engagement with local healthcare providers and community members, is essential for a complete and accurate assessment. This detailed analysis, when combined with geographic visualizations, can provide a powerful tool for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and patients alike.
For a visual representation of this data, including geographic mapping of physician locations, patient demographics, and access to care, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide an interactive and informative way to visualize the key factors influencing the Hypertension Score, enabling a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Muscadine and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like