36274, Roanoke, Alabama Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 36274, Roanoke, Alabama is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.21 percent of the residents in 36274 has some form of health insurance. 44.95 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.02 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36274 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,046 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36274. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,290 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 97 health care providers accessible to residents in 36274, Roanoke, Alabama.

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Roanoke, Alabama (ZIP Code 36274)**

Analyzing the landscape of hypertension management within Roanoke, Alabama (ZIP Code 36274) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers primary care physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the integration of mental health services – all crucial elements in effectively addressing this prevalent health concern. This analysis will provide a 'Hypertension Score' assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.

The foundation of effective hypertension management rests upon accessible primary care. In Roanoke, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While precise figures fluctuate, the availability of primary care physicians within the 36274 ZIP code, and its surrounding areas, should be assessed against national and state averages. A lower-than-average ratio may indicate potential challenges for patients seeking timely appointments and consistent care. This can lead to delayed diagnoses, inadequate monitoring, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes for individuals with hypertension.

Standout practices within the Roanoke area should be identified based on their commitment to hypertension management. These practices often demonstrate excellence through several key indicators. Firstly, they might have a high percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure, a direct measure of treatment efficacy. Secondly, they may implement robust patient education programs, empowering individuals to take an active role in managing their condition. Thirdly, these practices might utilize evidence-based guidelines, ensuring that patients receive the most up-to-date and effective treatments. Finally, they may have dedicated staff, such as nurses or certified clinical pharmacists, specializing in hypertension care.

Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool in healthcare, and its adoption within Roanoke’s primary care practices warrants investigation. Telemedicine offers several advantages for hypertension management. It allows for remote blood pressure monitoring, enabling physicians to track patient progress more frequently. It facilitates virtual consultations, making it easier for patients to access care, especially those with mobility issues or limited transportation options. Furthermore, telemedicine can provide opportunities for remote education and counseling, enhancing patient adherence to treatment plans. Practices with high telemedicine adoption rates are likely to score favorably in the 'Hypertension Score' assessment.

The intricate relationship between hypertension and mental health demands careful consideration. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can exacerbate hypertension and hinder treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the Roanoke healthcare system is a crucial factor. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site providers or referral networks, are better positioned to address the holistic needs of their patients. The 'Hypertension Score' should reflect the extent to which local healthcare providers recognize and address the mental health component of hypertension management.

The 'Hypertension Score' analysis would also consider the use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs streamline data management, enabling physicians to track patient progress, identify trends, and make informed decisions. Practices with well-integrated EHR systems are more likely to provide efficient and effective care. The ability to share information seamlessly between primary care physicians, specialists, and other healthcare providers is also essential. This interoperability ensures coordinated care and reduces the risk of medical errors.

Another aspect to consider is the availability of resources for underserved populations. Roanoke, like many communities, may have disparities in healthcare access based on socioeconomic status, race, or other factors. The 'Hypertension Score' should evaluate the efforts of local healthcare providers to address these disparities. This might include offering sliding-scale fees, providing language services, or partnering with community organizations to reach vulnerable populations.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of specialized care. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of hypertension management, access to specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists, is also crucial. The 'Hypertension Score' should assess the proximity of these specialists and the ease with which patients can access their services. This includes evaluating referral processes and wait times for appointments.

The 'Hypertension Score' would also incorporate data on medication adherence. Non-adherence to prescribed medications is a major obstacle to effective hypertension control. Practices that implement strategies to improve medication adherence, such as medication reconciliation, reminder systems, and patient education, should receive higher scores. The analysis should also consider the availability of affordable medications, particularly for patients with limited financial resources.

In conclusion, the 'Hypertension Score' for doctors in ZIP Code 36274, and the primary care availability in Roanoke, would be a complex assessment. It would consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. The score would reflect the overall quality and accessibility of hypertension care in the area, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement. It is a dynamic assessment, subject to change as healthcare practices evolve and new technologies emerge.

**Call to Action**

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Roanoke, Alabama, and visualize the data discussed in this analysis, explore the power of geospatial mapping. Utilize CartoChrome maps to analyze physician locations, patient demographics, and healthcare resource distribution. This visual approach will provide invaluable insights into healthcare access and disparities.