36505, Axis, Alabama Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 36505, Axis, Alabama is 55 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 84.57 percent of the residents in 36505 has some form of health insurance. 34.35 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36505 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 253 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36505. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 130 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,054 health care providers accessible to residents in 36505, Axis, Alabama.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36505 & Primary Care in Axis, Alabama

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP code 36505, encompassing the town of Axis, Alabama, with a specific focus on primary care availability and related resources. We aim to provide a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" assessment, evaluating the accessibility, quality, and innovation of healthcare providers in this area. This assessment will consider physician-to-patient ratios, noteworthy practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial elements in effective hypertension control.

The foundation of effective hypertension management is accessible primary care. In Axis (ZIP code 36505), the physician-to-patient ratio serves as a critical indicator. A high ratio, reflecting a limited number of physicians relative to the population, can create barriers to timely appointments, regular check-ups, and consistent monitoring, all essential for managing hypertension. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility, potentially leading to better patient outcomes. This ratio needs to be assessed against the broader regional and national averages to determine the relative accessibility of primary care in Axis.

Examining the practices within ZIP code 36505 reveals crucial insights. We must investigate the size of the practices, the types of services offered, and the specific expertise of the physicians. Some practices may stand out due to their commitment to hypertension management. This could manifest through specialized programs, such as dedicated hypertension clinics, or the implementation of evidence-based protocols for diagnosis, treatment, and patient education. These standout practices often employ innovative strategies to improve patient adherence to medication regimens and lifestyle modifications, which are crucial for managing hypertension.

Telemedicine adoption is another key factor in the Hypertension Score. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and digital patient education significantly enhances accessibility, particularly for patients who face geographical limitations or mobility challenges. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can provide more frequent and convenient follow-up appointments, allowing for more proactive management of hypertension. This proactive approach is critical in preventing complications associated with uncontrolled blood pressure.

Furthermore, the integration of mental health resources is vital. The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, practices that offer or have readily accessible mental health services, such as counseling or psychiatric support, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. This integration can improve patient outcomes by addressing the psychological factors that contribute to hypertension.

Evaluating the specific practices requires a deeper dive. We need to identify the names of the primary care providers in the area. This includes not only the individual physicians but also the clinics and hospitals they are affiliated with. We must assess the patient reviews and ratings, which provide valuable insights into the patient experience. This includes factors such as wait times, communication, and the overall quality of care. Furthermore, it is crucial to determine the insurance plans accepted by each practice, as this directly impacts access to care for residents with different insurance coverage.

The quality of care also depends on the resources available. Are there on-site pharmacies? Are there diagnostic facilities, such as labs and imaging services? The availability of these resources streamlines the patient journey and facilitates prompt diagnosis and treatment. The presence of specialized staff, such as certified diabetes educators or registered dietitians, further enhances the comprehensive care provided to patients with hypertension.

The Hypertension Score should also consider the use of technology. Does the practice utilize electronic health records (EHRs)? EHRs facilitate better communication between providers, improve the accuracy of patient records, and support data-driven decision-making. Does the practice offer patient portals, allowing patients to access their medical information, schedule appointments, and communicate with their providers online? These technological advancements enhance patient engagement and empower them to take a more active role in their healthcare.

Beyond the individual practices, we must consider the broader healthcare ecosystem in Axis. Are there collaborations between primary care providers and specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists? These collaborations ensure that patients with complex cases receive the specialized care they need. Are there community health initiatives aimed at promoting healthy lifestyles and preventing hypertension? These initiatives contribute to the overall health and well-being of the community.

The assessment should also consider the availability of patient education materials. Do practices provide educational resources on topics such as healthy eating, exercise, and medication adherence? These materials empower patients to make informed decisions about their health and adopt lifestyle modifications that can help control their blood pressure. The availability of these resources, in multiple formats (e.g., written materials, online videos), is a significant factor.

In conclusion, the "Hypertension Score" for doctors in ZIP code 36505 and primary care availability in Axis requires a multifaceted approach. This assessment must consider physician-to-patient ratios, the characteristics of individual practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the broader healthcare ecosystem. A comprehensive analysis, incorporating these factors, will provide a valuable understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of hypertension management in this area.

To gain a clearer picture of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant data, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps offer a powerful visual representation of healthcare data, enabling you to identify areas with high needs and track trends over time.