36587, Wilmer, Alabama Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 36587, Wilmer, Alabama is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.17 percent of the residents in 36587 has some form of health insurance. 39.38 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.43 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36587 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,171 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 69 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36587. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,836 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 10,566 health care providers accessible to residents in 36587, Wilmer, Alabama.

The task involves several components. First, we need to create a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" analysis for doctors in ZIP code 36587, focusing on hypertension management. Second, we need to assess primary care availability in Wilmer, which is likely a smaller geographic area within or near the ZIP code. Third, we need to incorporate specific details regarding physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. Finally, we need to conclude with a call to action for CartoChrome maps.

Let's begin with the "Hypertension Score" analysis for doctors in ZIP code 36587. This score is a hypothetical metric, designed to evaluate the quality of hypertension care provided by physicians in this specific area. The score would be based on several key indicators, weighted to reflect their importance in effective hypertension management.

One critical factor is the percentage of a physician's hypertensive patients whose blood pressure is adequately controlled. This data point, ideally sourced from electronic health records (EHRs), provides a direct measure of treatment effectiveness. A higher percentage of controlled patients would contribute positively to the score. Access to this data would be difficult, but it's a critical piece of the puzzle.

Another crucial element is the use of evidence-based guidelines. The score would evaluate whether physicians adhere to established guidelines for hypertension diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. This includes the use of appropriate medications, lifestyle recommendations, and regular monitoring. The score could consider the frequency of guideline adherence, potentially assessed through chart reviews or EHR data analysis.

The availability and utilization of patient education resources would also be factored in. Effective hypertension management requires patient understanding and engagement. Physicians who provide patients with educational materials, counseling on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), and readily available information would receive a higher score. This aspect could be assessed through patient surveys or practice audits.

The integration of technology is becoming increasingly important. Telemedicine adoption, allowing for remote blood pressure monitoring and virtual consultations, would be a positive factor. Practices that utilize remote patient monitoring systems and offer telehealth appointments for hypertension management would likely receive a higher score. This could be assessed through practice websites, staff interviews, and EHR data.

Now, let's consider the primary care availability in Wilmer. This is a critical component of hypertension care, as primary care physicians often serve as the first point of contact for patients with high blood pressure. We need to assess the physician-to-patient ratio in Wilmer. Ideally, this would involve calculating the number of primary care physicians practicing within Wilmer and dividing it by the population of Wilmer. This would give us a physician-to-patient ratio, which can be compared to state or national averages. A lower ratio (more physicians per patient) would indicate better access to care. This data would be difficult to obtain without access to specialized databases.

Beyond the raw physician-to-patient ratio, we need to consider the types of primary care practices available in Wilmer. Are there solo practices, group practices, or larger healthcare systems? Group practices often have more resources and may offer a wider range of services, including specialized care and ancillary services. The availability of after-hours care and weekend appointments is also important.

The presence of standout practices within Wilmer is a key consideration. These practices might be recognized for their commitment to patient care, their use of innovative technologies, or their positive patient outcomes. Identifying these practices would involve a combination of research, including online reviews, patient testimonials, and possibly interviews with local healthcare professionals. These practices could serve as models for other providers in the area.

Telemedicine adoption within Wilmer is an important factor. As mentioned earlier, telemedicine can play a significant role in hypertension management. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption would involve examining practice websites, contacting practices directly, and reviewing any available data on telehealth utilization. Practices that have embraced telemedicine for hypertension management would be viewed favorably.

The availability of mental health resources is another crucial element. Hypertension and mental health are often intertwined. Stress and anxiety can contribute to high blood pressure, and managing both physical and mental health is essential for overall well-being. The score would assess the availability of mental health services within Wilmer, including access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices would be a significant positive factor.

The "Hypertension Score" analysis for physicians in ZIP code 36587, and the assessment of primary care availability in Wilmer, are complex tasks. A comprehensive analysis would require access to data from various sources, including EHRs, patient surveys, practice websites, and healthcare databases. The hypothetical score would be a composite metric, reflecting the quality of care provided, the resources available, and the adoption of best practices.

The availability of mental health resources in Wilmer is also important. The presence of mental health professionals and the integration of mental health services into primary care practices would be a positive factor. Practices that offer counseling, therapy, or psychiatric services would be viewed favorably. This could be assessed through online research, practice websites, and interviews.

In conclusion, the "Hypertension Score" analysis, and the assessment of primary care availability in Wilmer, are crucial for understanding the quality of hypertension care in this specific geographic area. The analysis should consider factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the use of evidence-based guidelines, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.

To gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, physician locations, and patient demographics in ZIP code 36587 and Wilmer, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer powerful visualization tools that can help you analyze spatial data, identify patterns, and gain valuable insights into the healthcare landscape.