36744, Greensboro, Alabama Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 36744, Greensboro, Alabama is 7 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.45 percent of the residents in 36744 has some form of health insurance. 53.14 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36744 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,345 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36744. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,157 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 247 health care providers accessible to residents in 36744, Greensboro, Alabama.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36744 & Primary Care Availability in Greensboro

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning hypertension management, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis evaluates the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) in ZIP Code 36744 (assuming this represents a specific geographic area) and Greensboro, North Carolina, considering factors crucial for hypertension control. These factors include physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, all of which significantly impact patient outcomes.

ZIP Code 36744, if rural or underserved, may face significant challenges. Physician-to-patient ratios are often a primary indicator of access. A high ratio, meaning a large number of patients per PCP, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, inadequate follow-up care. This scarcity of PCPs can disproportionately affect individuals with chronic conditions like hypertension, who require regular monitoring and medication adjustments. The success of hypertension management hinges on consistent care.

In contrast, Greensboro, a larger urban center, may present a different picture. While a higher population density could also strain resources, the potential for a more favorable physician-to-patient ratio exists. The presence of larger medical groups and hospital systems often translates into greater access to specialists and ancillary services, which are crucial for comprehensive hypertension care. However, even in areas with seemingly adequate physician numbers, disparities can exist based on insurance coverage, socioeconomic status, and geographic location within the city.

Standout practices, those demonstrating exceptional patient outcomes and innovative approaches, play a vital role in improving hypertension management. These practices often implement evidence-based guidelines, utilize patient education programs, and prioritize preventative care. They may also have dedicated staff, such as nurses and certified diabetes educators, who are trained to manage hypertension. Identifying and recognizing these practices within both ZIP Code 36744 and Greensboro is essential.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions. Telemedicine offers several benefits for hypertension patients, including remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management. In areas with limited access to PCPs, telemedicine can bridge the gap, providing patients with timely access to care. Evaluating the extent of telemedicine adoption among physicians in both locations is crucial.

Mental health resources are inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Patients with these conditions may struggle to adhere to medication regimens and lifestyle modifications. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within or in close proximity to primary care practices is therefore critical. Integrated care models, where mental health services are seamlessly integrated into primary care, can improve patient outcomes.

The analysis would delve into specific practices within ZIP Code 36744, examining their patient volumes, staffing levels, and the services they offer. It would also investigate the presence of any community health centers or free clinics that provide care to underserved populations. Data on wait times for appointments and patient satisfaction scores would further illuminate the quality of care.

In Greensboro, the analysis would focus on the major healthcare systems and their associated primary care practices. It would assess the availability of specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists, who are often involved in managing complex hypertension cases. The analysis would also investigate the presence of specialized hypertension clinics or programs.

The evaluation of telemedicine adoption would involve surveying physicians to determine the types of telemedicine services they offer, the frequency of their use, and the patient populations they serve. The analysis would also consider the technological infrastructure available to support telemedicine, such as secure patient portals and remote monitoring devices.

Assessing the availability of mental health resources would involve identifying the number of mental health professionals in each location, the types of services they offer, and the extent to which they collaborate with primary care practices. The analysis would also consider the availability of mental health resources for specific populations, such as veterans or individuals with substance use disorders.

A comprehensive analysis would also consider the demographics of the populations served by the physicians in each location. Factors such as age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status can significantly impact health outcomes. The analysis would identify any disparities in access to care or quality of care based on these factors.

The final hypertension score would be a composite measure, incorporating all of the factors discussed above. The score would provide a comparative assessment of the availability and quality of hypertension care in ZIP Code 36744 and Greensboro. The score would be accompanied by specific recommendations for improving access to care and patient outcomes.

The goal is to provide actionable insights that can be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients to improve hypertension management. This includes identifying areas where resources are needed, highlighting best practices, and promoting the adoption of innovative approaches to care.

To further enhance your understanding of healthcare landscapes and visualize the data discussed, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, healthcare access, and population demographics, offering valuable insights for healthcare planning and resource allocation.