The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 06033, Glastonbury, Connecticut is 83 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.47 percent of the residents in 06033 has some form of health insurance. 26.26 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 85.53 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06033 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,331 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06033. An estimate of 16 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,892 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,571 health care providers accessible to residents in 06033, Glastonbury, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06033, Glastonbury, Connecticut
Hypertension Score | 86 |
---|---|
People Score | 52 |
Provider Score | 83 |
Hospital Score | 44 |
Travel Score | 72 |
06033 | Glastonbury | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Glastonbury, Connecticut, ZIP code 06033, presents a unique landscape for evaluating hypertension care. Analyzing the quality of care for this condition, a significant public health concern, necessitates a multifaceted approach. This analysis will explore the availability of primary care physicians, assess physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, and examine the adoption of telemedicine and mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive “Hypertension Score” analysis, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare infrastructure.
The cornerstone of effective hypertension management is access to primary care. In Glastonbury, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical factor. The town, known for its relatively affluent population and access to quality healthcare, generally enjoys a favorable PCP density compared to other areas. However, this doesn't automatically translate to optimal care. The distribution of these physicians, their patient load, and their specific expertise in hypertension management are equally important. A high concentration of PCPs is positive, but a more detailed examination is required to ascertain the actual accessibility and quality of care.
Physician-to-patient ratios provide a crucial metric for assessing access. An ideal ratio allows physicians to dedicate sufficient time to each patient, facilitating thorough evaluations, personalized treatment plans, and regular follow-up appointments – all essential for hypertension control. While precise ratios fluctuate, and are subject to change, a higher ratio (more patients per physician) can potentially strain resources, leading to shorter appointment times and less frequent monitoring. The analysis should delve into the specific ratios for PCPs in 06033, comparing them to state and national averages.
Identifying standout practices is essential. Practices that demonstrate exemplary hypertension management often exhibit several key characteristics. These include a proactive approach to screening and diagnosis, the use of evidence-based treatment guidelines, robust patient education programs, and a strong emphasis on lifestyle modifications. Furthermore, practices employing advanced technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate data analysis and patient tracking, are often better positioned to deliver superior care. Examining the practices in Glastonbury, focusing on their adherence to these best practices, allows for a more nuanced understanding of the quality of care available.
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services remotely via technology, has become increasingly relevant, particularly in managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Telemedicine offers several potential benefits, including increased access to care, improved patient convenience, and enhanced monitoring capabilities. In the context of hypertension, telemedicine can facilitate remote blood pressure monitoring, medication management, and virtual consultations. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine by PCPs in 06033 is critical. Are they utilizing telehealth platforms? Are patients able to easily access virtual appointments? The extent of telemedicine integration directly impacts patient convenience and the potential for improved outcomes.
The interplay between hypertension and mental health is often overlooked, but it is a significant factor. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and can negatively impact a patient's adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an important component of comprehensive hypertension care. This analysis should investigate the presence of mental health professionals within primary care practices, as well as the accessibility of external mental health services in Glastonbury. Are there integrated behavioral health programs? Are patients easily referred to mental health specialists? The integration of mental health services contributes to holistic patient care.
The “Hypertension Score” analysis for 06033 should incorporate these diverse factors. It's not simply about counting physicians. It's about assessing the quality of care, the accessibility of services, and the integration of supportive resources. This includes evaluating the physician-to-patient ratios, the use of evidence-based guidelines, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support. The analysis should also consider patient satisfaction, as measured through surveys or other feedback mechanisms.
The final score should reflect a comprehensive assessment of the local healthcare landscape. It should highlight areas of strength, such as exemplary practices or innovative telemedicine initiatives. It should also identify areas for improvement, such as physician shortages or a lack of mental health resources. This detailed assessment allows for a more informed understanding of the quality of care for hypertension in Glastonbury, Connecticut.
This analysis can be further enhanced by using data visualization tools. Tools like CartoChrome maps can visually represent the geographical distribution of PCPs, the location of mental health services, and the availability of telemedicine platforms. This visual representation can provide a clearer and more intuitive understanding of the healthcare landscape. CartoChrome maps can be used to identify areas with limited access to care, allowing for targeted interventions and resource allocation.
The goal is to create a useful and actionable resource for both patients and healthcare providers. Patients can use this information to make informed decisions about their care, while healthcare providers can use it to identify areas for improvement and to collaborate on strategies for enhancing hypertension management in Glastonbury. The analysis should ultimately empower patients to take control of their health and provide healthcare providers with the data needed to deliver high-quality care.
For a more detailed and visually informative understanding of the healthcare landscape in Glastonbury, including the geographical distribution of physicians, access to specialists, and the availability of telemedicine and mental health resources, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer an interactive and intuitive way to visualize the data and gain valuable insights.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like