The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 06076, Stafford Springs, Connecticut is 28 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.92 percent of the residents in 06076 has some form of health insurance. 35.05 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.05 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06076 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,496 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06076. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,295 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,571 health care providers accessible to residents in 06076, Stafford Springs, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06076, Stafford Springs, Connecticut
Hypertension Score | 34 |
---|---|
People Score | 22 |
Provider Score | 28 |
Hospital Score | 46 |
Travel Score | 73 |
06076 | Stafford Springs | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Stafford Springs, CT (ZIP Code 06076)
This analysis provides a Hypertension Score ranking for primary care physicians within the 06076 ZIP code, focusing on factors crucial for effective hypertension management. It considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of integrated mental health resources. This assessment aims to offer residents of Stafford Springs a nuanced understanding of local healthcare options, facilitating informed decisions regarding their cardiovascular health.
The foundation of a robust hypertension management program lies in accessible and responsive primary care. Analyzing physician-to-patient ratios offers a critical initial insight. While precise, real-time data fluctuates, publicly available sources, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical board databases, can provide estimates. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can potentially strain resources, impacting appointment availability and the time dedicated to individual patient care. Within Stafford Springs, the analysis would pinpoint specific physician practices and their estimated patient load. Practices with lower ratios, suggesting a potentially more manageable patient volume, would likely receive a higher score in this crucial metric.
Beyond raw numbers, the structure and operational efficiency of individual practices are paramount. Practices employing electronic health records (EHRs) with integrated features for hypertension management, such as automated blood pressure tracking, medication reminders, and patient portals for communication, would score favorably. The presence of certified hypertension specialists, or physicians with a demonstrated focus on cardiovascular health, would also be a significant positive factor. Furthermore, practices offering extended hours, weekend appointments, or same-day availability for urgent concerns would be viewed as more patient-centric and efficient, contributing to a higher score.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly vital, particularly in managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Practices actively utilizing telehealth platforms for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote blood pressure monitoring would be highly ranked. This capability enhances accessibility, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Telemedicine also enables more frequent follow-up appointments, allowing for proactive intervention and adjustments to treatment plans, contributing to improved blood pressure control. The analysis would evaluate the specific telemedicine platforms used, their ease of use, and the range of services offered through telehealth.
The intricate link between mental health and hypertension necessitates careful consideration. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site therapists or established referral networks, would receive a substantial boost in their Hypertension Score. The analysis would investigate the availability of these resources, the ease of access for patients, and the degree of collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals. Practices fostering a holistic approach to patient care, addressing both physical and mental well-being, would be prioritized.
The analysis would also consider the practice's commitment to patient education and self-management. Practices providing educational materials, such as pamphlets, online resources, and group classes, on topics like healthy eating, exercise, and stress management would score favorably. This reflects a proactive approach to empowering patients to take control of their health. The analysis would examine the availability and quality of these educational resources, as well as the practice's willingness to engage in shared decision-making with patients regarding their treatment plans.
Specific examples of standout practices, if available, would be highlighted. This would involve identifying practices demonstrating excellence in multiple areas, such as low physician-to-patient ratios, robust telemedicine capabilities, and integrated mental health services. These practices would serve as models for other providers in the area. The analysis would also identify any potential gaps in care, such as limited access to specialized services or a lack of telemedicine options.
The Hypertension Score ranking is a dynamic assessment, influenced by evolving healthcare practices and technological advancements. The analysis would be regularly updated to reflect these changes, ensuring its ongoing relevance and utility for residents of Stafford Springs. The goal is to provide a clear and concise overview of the local healthcare landscape, empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their cardiovascular health. This involves a thorough investigation of each practice's strengths and weaknesses, providing a comprehensive picture of the available resources.
The final Hypertension Score would be a composite measure, weighting the various factors discussed above. Physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration would each contribute to the overall score. The weighting assigned to each factor would reflect its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension management. The analysis would strive for transparency, clearly outlining the methodology used to calculate the scores.
The analysis would also consider the presence of community resources that support hypertension management. This includes access to local pharmacies, support groups, and community health programs. The availability of these resources can enhance the overall effectiveness of hypertension management efforts. The analysis would assess the accessibility and quality of these community resources, providing a holistic view of the support available to patients in Stafford Springs.
The analysis would also evaluate the practice’s commitment to patient communication. Practices that prioritize clear and effective communication with patients, including providing timely responses to inquiries and explaining complex medical information in an understandable manner, would score favorably. This reflects a patient-centered approach to care. The analysis would assess the practice's communication practices, including the use of patient portals, email, and phone calls.
Finally, the analysis would be presented in a user-friendly format, making it easy for residents of Stafford Springs to understand the findings. The Hypertension Score ranking would be accompanied by a brief summary of each practice's strengths and weaknesses, providing a clear and concise overview of the local healthcare landscape. This information would empower individuals to make informed decisions about their cardiovascular health.
To visualize this data and gain a geographic understanding of physician locations and their associated Hypertension Scores, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a visual representation of the analysis, allowing you to easily identify practices that meet your specific needs and preferences.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like