The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 06084, Tolland, Connecticut is 80 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.29 percent of the residents in 06084 has some form of health insurance. 24.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 83.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06084 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,148 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06084. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,235 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,818 health care providers accessible to residents in 06084, Tolland, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06084, Tolland, Connecticut
Hypertension Score | 87 |
---|---|
People Score | 61 |
Provider Score | 80 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 70 |
06084 | Tolland | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" assessment for primary care physicians within ZIP code 06084 (Tolland, CT), focusing on their capacity to manage hypertension and the overall availability of primary care services in the town. This assessment considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The score is not a definitive ranking but rather a composite view based on publicly available data and hypothetical assumptions, as comprehensive, real-time data is often proprietary.
The "Hypertension Score" is conceptualized as a multi-faceted metric. It considers not only the individual physician's capabilities but also the broader healthcare ecosystem within Tolland. This holistic approach acknowledges that effective hypertension management requires more than just the expertise of a single physician; it necessitates accessible care, patient education, and a supportive community.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial element. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can strain resources and limit appointment availability. In Tolland, the score would be influenced by the estimated number of primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code and the town’s population. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards, though often requiring interpretation and cross-referencing, would be utilized to approximate these ratios. A higher ratio would negatively impact the score, indicating potential challenges in accessing timely care.
The characteristics of individual practices significantly influence the score. Practices that emphasize preventative care, offer extended hours, and have efficient appointment scheduling systems would receive higher marks. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to proactive hypertension management. The presence of on-site diagnostic capabilities, such as blood pressure monitoring and laboratory services, would also be viewed favorably. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), would be considered to have a higher capacity to manage hypertension effectively.
Standout practices within Tolland, if any, would be identified through a review of publicly available information, patient reviews (with the understanding of their limitations), and potentially through consultations with local healthcare professionals. These practices would be recognized for their patient-centered approach, commitment to evidence-based medicine, and innovative strategies for hypertension management. For example, a practice that actively engages patients in self-management through educational programs or remote monitoring would likely receive a high score.
Telemedicine adoption is a critical factor in the modern healthcare landscape, particularly for managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Practices that offer telehealth consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and virtual patient education programs would be viewed more positively. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically remote areas. The score would reflect the extent to which practices have integrated telehealth into their workflow and the types of services they offer remotely.
The integration of mental health resources is another important consideration. Hypertension and mental health are often interconnected. Stress and anxiety can contribute to elevated blood pressure, and effective hypertension management often requires addressing these underlying factors. Practices that have integrated mental health services, either through on-site therapists or through referral networks, would receive higher marks. This integration demonstrates a holistic approach to patient care and a recognition of the complex interplay between physical and mental health.
The "Hypertension Score" would also consider the availability of community resources. The presence of local support groups, educational programs, and access to healthy food options would contribute positively to the overall score. These resources empower patients to take an active role in managing their condition and create a supportive environment for healthy living. The score would reflect the extent to which practices are connected to and leverage these community resources.
The assessment process would begin with a comprehensive search of publicly available data. This would include information from the Connecticut Department of Public Health, the HRSA, and online physician directories. Patient reviews, while often subjective, would be considered as part of the overall assessment. The information gathered would be analyzed to identify patterns and trends.
The score for each physician would be based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above. The weights would be determined based on their relative importance in hypertension management. For example, physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, and telemedicine adoption would likely be weighted more heavily than the availability of community resources. The final score would be a composite metric that reflects the overall capacity of primary care physicians in ZIP code 06084 to manage hypertension effectively.
The limitations of this hypothetical "Hypertension Score" must be acknowledged. The analysis relies on publicly available data, which may not always be complete or up-to-date. The score is based on assumptions and estimations, and it does not replace a comprehensive clinical assessment. Patient reviews can be biased and may not accurately reflect the quality of care provided.
Despite these limitations, the "Hypertension Score" provides a valuable framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of primary care services in Tolland, CT, concerning hypertension management. It highlights the importance of various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The analysis also underscores the need for a holistic approach to patient care, recognizing the complex interplay between physical and mental health.
For a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and a more visual understanding of physician availability in Tolland and surrounding areas, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping platform can provide a detailed geographic representation of healthcare providers, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of access to care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like