Hypertension Score

06333, East Lyme, Connecticut Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut is 54 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.58 percent of the residents in 06333 has some form of health insurance. 23.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 82.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06333 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,748 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06333. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,067 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,489 health care providers accessible to residents in 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut.

Health Scores in 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut

Hypertension Score 61
People Score 74
Provider Score 54
Hospital Score 36
Travel Score 43

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

06333 East Lyme Connecticut
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut

## Hypertension Score Analysis: East Lyme, CT (ZIP Code 06333)

This analysis evaluates the landscape of hypertension care within ZIP code 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut, focusing on primary care availability and the resources dedicated to managing this prevalent condition. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem, ultimately informing both patient choices and potential areas for improvement. The assessment considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components of comprehensive hypertension management.

The physician-to-patient ratio in East Lyme is a critical indicator of access to care. While precise figures fluctuate, publicly available data from sources like the Connecticut Department of Public Health and the US Census Bureau, when cross-referenced, provide an estimated ratio. A favorable ratio, meaning a higher number of physicians per capita, generally translates to easier access for appointments, reduced wait times, and more personalized care. Conversely, a lower ratio can create bottlenecks, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment, which are detrimental to hypertension management. The analysis must consider not only the total number of primary care physicians but also their specialties, their acceptance of new patients, and their participation in insurance networks.

Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several criteria. These include the utilization of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management, patient outcomes data (where available and ethically sourced), patient satisfaction scores, and the integration of technology to improve care delivery. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the American Heart Association or the American Medical Association, demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality care. Furthermore, practices that offer comprehensive services, including lifestyle counseling, medication management, and regular follow-up appointments, are better equipped to manage hypertension effectively.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important in healthcare delivery, especially for chronic conditions like hypertension. Telemedicine allows for remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management, enhancing patient convenience and improving adherence to treatment plans. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual visits and remote monitoring tools, are better positioned to serve patients, particularly those with mobility issues or limited access to transportation. The analysis must examine the types of telemedicine services offered, the availability of technical support for patients, and the integration of telemedicine platforms with electronic health records.

The crucial link between mental health and hypertension management cannot be ignored. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referrals is a key factor in evaluating the quality of hypertension care. Practices that screen patients for mental health conditions, offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. This integrated approach is vital for addressing the psychological factors that can contribute to uncontrolled hypertension.

The analysis of East Lyme’s healthcare landscape reveals several key considerations. The physician-to-patient ratio, while subject to ongoing data collection, requires scrutiny to identify potential access barriers. The evaluation of standout practices should focus on those demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based guidelines, patient outcomes, and technological innovation. Telemedicine adoption, while promising, must be assessed for its accessibility and integration with existing care models. The integration of mental health services is paramount for comprehensive hypertension management.

The ability to accurately assess the quality of hypertension care in East Lyme depends on the availability of comprehensive and up-to-date data. Publicly available data sources, such as those from the Connecticut Department of Public Health, the US Census Bureau, and healthcare provider directories, provide a foundation for analysis. However, the analysis should also incorporate data from patient surveys, practice websites, and other sources to gain a more complete understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem.

The analysis should not only identify the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system but also provide actionable recommendations for improvement. These recommendations might include strategies to improve physician-to-patient ratios, encourage telemedicine adoption, and enhance the integration of mental health services. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of care for individuals with hypertension in East Lyme.

The assessment of primary care availability must also consider the geographic distribution of practices within the ZIP code. Are practices concentrated in certain areas, leaving others underserved? The analysis should incorporate geographic data to identify potential disparities in access to care. This involves mapping the locations of primary care practices and comparing them to population density and demographic data.

The analysis should also consider the availability of ancillary services that support hypertension management. These include access to registered dietitians, certified diabetes educators, and pharmacists who can provide medication counseling. Practices that collaborate with these professionals are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. The analysis should assess the extent of these collaborations and their impact on patient outcomes.

The evaluation of patient outcomes is a critical component of the analysis. While obtaining comprehensive outcome data can be challenging due to privacy concerns and data availability limitations, the analysis should attempt to identify practices that track and report patient outcomes, such as blood pressure control rates and rates of cardiovascular events. This data provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different treatment approaches and helps identify areas for improvement.

In conclusion, a thorough analysis of hypertension care in East Lyme (06333) requires a multifaceted approach, considering physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. This comprehensive evaluation allows for a more informed understanding of the local healthcare landscape and identifies opportunities to improve care for individuals with hypertension.

Want to visualize the geographic distribution of primary care physicians and other healthcare resources in East Lyme and beyond? Explore the power of location intelligence with CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of healthcare access and identify potential areas for improvement.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut

You may also like

06357, Niantic, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 3.68 Miles

Total Population:

06371, Old Lyme, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 4.88 Miles

Total Population:

06376, South Lyme, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 5.49 Miles

Total Population:

06375, Quaker Hill, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 6.34 Miles

Total Population:

06320, New London, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 6.78 Miles

Total Population:

06353, Montville, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 7.61 Miles

Total Population:

06370, Oakdale, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 7.79 Miles

Total Population:

06382, Uncasville, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 8.27 Miles

Total Population:

06340, Groton, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06333: 9.31 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 06333, East Lyme, Connecticut