Hypertension Score

06750, Bantam, Connecticut Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 06750, Bantam, Connecticut

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 06750, Bantam, Connecticut is 53 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.78 percent of the residents in 06750 has some form of health insurance. 50.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.28 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06750 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 186 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06750. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 367 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,146 health care providers accessible to residents in 06750, Bantam, Connecticut.

Health Scores in 06750, Bantam, Connecticut

Hypertension Score 57
People Score 68
Provider Score 53
Hospital Score 43
Travel Score 38

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

06750 Bantam Connecticut
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 06750, Bantam, Connecticut

## Hypertension Score Analysis: ZIP Code 06750 & Bantam Primary Care

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP Code 06750, focusing on primary care availability in the nearby community of Bantam. We aim to provide a 'Hypertension Score' assessment, considering factors crucial to effective care: physician-to-patient ratios, practice performance, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health support. This evaluation will illuminate the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem, specifically as it pertains to managing this prevalent condition.

Assessing the overall effectiveness of hypertension care necessitates a multi-faceted approach. Simply counting the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) in a given area is insufficient. We must consider the patient population, the specific resources available, and the innovative strategies employed to improve patient outcomes.

The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced patient-physician interaction, and potentially, less proactive management of chronic conditions like hypertension. While precise data on the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 06750 requires detailed data analysis (which is beyond the scope of this analysis, but could be provided with more data), publicly available information can offer a general idea. The availability of primary care in Bantam is a crucial factor, as residents of 06750 may seek care there. This analysis considers the proximity and accessibility of Bantam's primary care resources.

Identifying standout practices requires scrutinizing various performance indicators. This includes the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure, the frequency of follow-up appointments, and the utilization of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. Practices employing advanced technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs) with integrated decision support tools, are often better equipped to monitor patient progress and implement personalized treatment plans. The ability to readily access and share patient data between specialists and primary care providers is also a key factor.

Telemedicine has emerged as a significant tool in managing chronic conditions. Its adoption rate within the local healthcare system is a critical component of our analysis. Practices offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in rural areas. Telemedicine can also facilitate more frequent check-ins and provide timely interventions, ultimately leading to better blood pressure control. The integration of telemedicine into the standard of care is a key aspect of a high 'Hypertension Score'.

Hypertension is often linked to mental health challenges, such as stress, anxiety, and depression. These conditions can significantly impact a patient's ability to adhere to treatment plans and manage their blood pressure effectively. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the local healthcare network is a crucial consideration. Practices that integrate behavioral health services, offer access to mental health professionals, or provide educational materials on stress management are better positioned to support their patients' overall well-being and improve hypertension outcomes.

The 'Hypertension Score' is not a single, easily quantifiable number. It's a composite evaluation based on the factors discussed. Practices demonstrating excellence in all areas – favorable physician-to-patient ratios, proactive use of technology, robust telemedicine adoption, and strong integration of mental health support – will receive higher scores. Conversely, practices with limited resources, poor performance metrics, and a lack of these key elements will receive lower scores.

Specific examples of standout practices within 06750 and Bantam are difficult to provide without more detailed data. However, we can hypothesize what would constitute a high-scoring practice. A practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, using EHRs to track patient data, offering virtual consultations, providing remote blood pressure monitoring, and having a dedicated mental health professional on staff would be considered a high-performing practice. This practice would also likely demonstrate a high percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure.

Conversely, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio, limited technology, no telemedicine options, and no mental health resources would likely have a lower 'Hypertension Score'. This practice might struggle to provide timely appointments, effectively monitor patient progress, and address the complex needs of patients with hypertension.

The success of hypertension management also hinges on patient education and engagement. Practices that provide patients with educational materials, offer support groups, and encourage self-monitoring of blood pressure are more likely to achieve positive outcomes. The ability of patients to actively participate in their care is a critical factor in controlling hypertension.

The 'Hypertension Score' analysis highlights the importance of a holistic approach to hypertension management. It's not just about prescribing medication; it's about creating a supportive healthcare environment that addresses the physical, emotional, and social needs of patients. This includes access to primary care, the integration of technology, and the availability of mental health resources.

While this analysis provides a general overview, obtaining precise data on physician-to-patient ratios, practice performance, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources would require a more in-depth investigation. This could involve surveying local healthcare providers, analyzing patient data, and reviewing publicly available information.

The ultimate goal of a 'Hypertension Score' analysis is to empower patients and healthcare providers. By identifying areas of strength and weakness, we can work towards improving the quality of care and ultimately, reducing the burden of hypertension within the community. This includes advocating for increased access to primary care, promoting the adoption of innovative technologies, and ensuring that patients have access to the mental health support they need.

For a more detailed and geographically specific understanding of the healthcare landscape in 06750 and Bantam, including the locations of primary care providers, hospitals, and other relevant resources, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer interactive visualizations and data-driven insights that can help you navigate the healthcare system and make informed decisions about your health.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 06750, Bantam, Connecticut

You may also like

06763, Morris, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 2.88 Miles

Total Population:

06758, Lakeside, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 3.11 Miles

Total Population:

06759, Litchfield, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 3.60 Miles

Total Population:

06777, New Preston Marble Dale, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 5.25 Miles

Total Population:

06751, Bethlehem, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 5.96 Miles

Total Population:

06794, Washington Depot, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 6.32 Miles

Total Population:

06793, Washington, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 6.45 Miles

Total Population:

06754, Cornwall Bridge, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 6.93 Miles

Total Population:

06756, Goshen, Connecticut
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 06750: 7.28 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 06750, Bantam, Connecticut