06793, Washington, Connecticut Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 06793, Washington, Connecticut is 54 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.48 percent of the residents in 06793 has some form of health insurance. 36.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.20 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06793 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 205 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06793. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 478 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,724 health care providers accessible to residents in 06793, Washington, Connecticut.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 06793 & Washington Primary Care

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP code 06793 (likely a specific area in Connecticut, as ZIP codes are geographically unique) and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington state. The aim is to assess the quality and accessibility of care related to hypertension, a significant public health concern, focusing on key indicators like physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, which is crucial for holistic patient well-being.

The core of effective hypertension management lies in consistent access to primary care. Within 06793, the physician-to-patient ratio will significantly influence the quality of care. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, less thorough monitoring of blood pressure and medication adherence. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility, potentially allowing for more proactive interventions and preventative care. The specific ratio for 06793 needs to be determined, but this factor is paramount.

Evaluating standout practices within 06793 necessitates a deep dive into their operational models. Are there practices that are patient-centered medical homes? These practices often emphasize care coordination, patient education, and proactive outreach, which are essential for successful hypertension control. Do they employ certified clinical medical assistants (CCMAs) or registered nurses (RNs) to assist with patient education and medication management? The use of these allied health professionals can significantly improve patient outcomes. The practices’ adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and their ability to generate patient registries for hypertension management are also critical. These registries allow physicians to identify patients at risk, track their progress, and ensure they receive timely interventions.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for hypertension management, particularly in areas with limited access to care. Its adoption rate within 06793 is a crucial factor. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals can improve patient convenience, adherence, and outcomes. Telemedicine can also bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients in rural or underserved areas to access specialized care. The level of telemedicine integration within the practices in 06793 should be assessed.

Beyond medical care, mental health plays a crucial role in hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can elevate blood pressure, and mental health disorders can affect medication adherence and lifestyle choices. The availability of mental health resources within the 06793 community, and whether primary care practices have integrated mental health services, is critical. Do practices have on-site therapists or partnerships with mental health providers? Are they screening patients for depression and anxiety? The presence of these resources can significantly improve patient outcomes.

Expanding the scope to Washington state, the analysis must consider the overall primary care landscape. Washington, like many states, faces challenges in primary care access, particularly in rural areas. The state’s physician-to-population ratio, when compared to the national average, is a key indicator. Areas with lower ratios often experience disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. The state's initiatives to address primary care shortages, such as loan repayment programs for physicians practicing in underserved areas, should be reviewed.

The state's healthcare policies and initiatives related to hypertension management are also important. Are there programs promoting early detection and intervention? Are there efforts to improve patient education and self-management skills? The state's investment in these areas can significantly impact hypertension control rates. The state's Medicaid expansion and its impact on access to primary care for low-income individuals should also be considered.

The specific practices in Washington state, like those in 06793, need to be evaluated on their adoption of best practices. Do they utilize evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management? Are they actively involved in quality improvement initiatives? The use of patient-centered medical homes and the integration of mental health services are also crucial.

Telemedicine adoption in Washington is also a key factor. The state's policies and reimbursement models for telemedicine services can significantly influence its use. The extent to which practices are utilizing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and patient portals should be assessed. The use of telemedicine can be particularly beneficial in rural areas, where access to care is limited.

The availability of mental health resources across Washington is also important. The state's efforts to address the mental health crisis, including its investment in mental health services and its efforts to integrate mental health care into primary care settings, should be evaluated. The presence of mental health providers and the accessibility of mental health services can significantly impact hypertension control.

In conclusion, a comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' analysis requires a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, assessing the characteristics of standout practices, examining telemedicine adoption, and understanding the availability of mental health resources. This approach is critical for both the specific ZIP code 06793 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington.

To visualize the geographical distribution of primary care resources, compare physician-to-patient ratios, and identify areas with high rates of hypertension, explore the power of interactive mapping. Use CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions.