20012, Washington, District of Columbia Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 20012, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.28 percent of the residents in 20012 has some form of health insurance. 37.99 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20012 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 4,337 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20012. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,989 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,425 health care providers accessible to residents in 20012, Washington, District of Columbia.

The analysis below evaluates the quality of hypertension care within ZIP Code 20012, focusing on primary care physicians and resource availability. This assessment considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the landscape for individuals managing hypertension in this specific area and in the broader context of Washington, D.C.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of access to care. In ZIP Code 20012, the density of primary care physicians (PCPs) relative to the population directly impacts the ability of patients to receive timely and consistent care for hypertension. Areas with a lower ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, often experience longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to preventative care, which is crucial for managing hypertension. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can be utilized to determine the specific ratio within this ZIP code. This data is then compared to the national average and the average for the District of Columbia to provide a comparative context.

Standout practices within 20012, as identified through patient reviews, peer recommendations, and publicly available performance data, are assessed. These practices are evaluated based on their adherence to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management, patient satisfaction scores, and the integration of technology to improve patient care. For example, practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively to track patient progress, send automated reminders for medication refills, and provide patients with access to their health information online are considered favorably. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education and shared decision-making are also highly regarded. The presence of specialized programs, such as those focused on lifestyle modifications (diet and exercise) as a complement to medication, further enhances a practice’s standing.

Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The ability of patients to access their PCPs through virtual consultations has become increasingly important, especially for those managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Practices that offer telemedicine options, including video appointments and remote monitoring capabilities, are better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and patient education. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflow, ensuring patient privacy and data security, are prioritized in this analysis.

The integration of mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive hypertension management. The relationship between mental health and cardiovascular health is well-established. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and complicate treatment efforts. Therefore, practices that offer or have established partnerships with mental health professionals are considered to be providing more holistic care. This includes on-site mental health services, referrals to mental health specialists, and the integration of mental health screening tools into routine patient assessments. The presence of these resources indicates a greater understanding of the interconnectedness of physical and mental well-being.

Moving beyond ZIP Code 20012, the analysis considers the broader context of primary care availability in Washington, D.C. This involves assessing the overall supply of PCPs, the distribution of healthcare resources across the city, and the impact of social determinants of health on hypertension management. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, and safe environments can significantly influence a patient’s ability to manage their condition. The analysis considers these factors to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in providing hypertension care in the District.

The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology consultations and access to diagnostic testing, is also factored into the assessment. Timely access to these services is essential for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and ongoing monitoring of hypertension. Practices that have strong referral networks and efficient processes for coordinating care with specialists are considered more favorably.

Furthermore, the analysis examines the use of patient-centered care models. These models emphasize the importance of patient involvement in their own care, shared decision-making, and the development of individualized treatment plans. Practices that actively engage patients in their care are better positioned to improve patient outcomes and promote long-term adherence to treatment recommendations. This includes providing patients with clear and concise information about their condition, empowering them to make informed decisions, and addressing their individual needs and preferences.

Data sources for this analysis include public health records, physician directories, patient reviews, and information from healthcare organizations. The analysis aims to provide a balanced and objective assessment of the quality of hypertension care in the specified area.

The overall 'Hypertension Score' ranking for doctors in ZIP Code 20012 and primary care availability in Washington, D.C. is a complex calculation. The score is not a single number but rather a composite of multiple factors, each weighted based on its relative importance. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources all contribute to the final score.

The final score is intended to provide a snapshot of the current state of hypertension care in the area. It is important to remember that this is just one perspective, and individual experiences may vary. The information provided in this analysis should be used as a starting point for further research and discussion. The goal is to empower patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare and to encourage healthcare providers to continuously improve the quality of care they provide.

For a more detailed and interactive visualization of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 20012 and throughout Washington, D.C., including physician locations, service availability, and demographic data, explore CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of healthcare access and identifying areas for improvement.