20204, Washington, District of Columbia Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 20204, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20204 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20204 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20204. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 16,784 health care providers accessible to residents in 20204, Washington, District of Columbia.

Analyzing hypertension management within ZIP Code 20204 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington requires a multi-faceted approach. We'll examine key indicators, focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, the prevalence of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and identify potential standout practices. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the landscape and ultimately, inform strategies to improve hypertension care.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can strain access to care and potentially impact the timely diagnosis and management of hypertension. In ZIP Code 20204, which likely houses government agencies and potentially a concentration of federal employees, the demographic profile is critical. The age distribution, prevalence of chronic conditions, and access to health insurance significantly influence the demand for primary care services. Comparing this ratio to the average for Washington State and the national average provides a valuable benchmark. If 20204 exhibits a lower ratio than the state average, it suggests a potential challenge in accessing primary care, which could translate to delayed hypertension diagnoses and suboptimal treatment.

Primary care availability across Washington State is another critical factor. Rural areas often face significant challenges in recruiting and retaining physicians, leading to geographic disparities in access to care. The state's overall primary care physician supply, its distribution, and the presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and other safety-net providers play a vital role. Analyzing the distribution of primary care providers, taking into account the number of specialists in cardiology and nephrology, is essential for understanding the referral pathways for hypertension patients. A robust referral network is crucial for ensuring patients receive appropriate specialized care when needed.

Telemedicine adoption is transforming healthcare delivery, particularly in managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Telemedicine allows for remote blood pressure monitoring, medication adjustments, and virtual consultations, which can improve patient adherence and outcomes. Assessing the prevalence of telemedicine services among primary care providers in 20204 and across Washington State is important. Factors such as the availability of broadband internet, patient digital literacy, and insurance coverage for telehealth services influence the success of telemedicine programs. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their hypertension management protocols deserve recognition, as they can serve as models for others.

The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as essential for comprehensive hypertension care. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Primary care practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, are better positioned to address the holistic needs of their patients. Evaluating the availability of mental health services within primary care practices in 20204 and throughout Washington State provides insight into the support systems available to patients. Practices that prioritize mental health integration are likely to achieve better outcomes.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. This involves analyzing patient outcomes, patient satisfaction scores, and the adoption of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. Practices that demonstrate consistently good blood pressure control rates, patient adherence to medication, and high patient satisfaction should be highlighted. Examining their workflows, the use of technology, and their approach to patient education can provide valuable insights for other practices seeking to improve their hypertension care. These standout practices can serve as beacons of best practices, offering valuable lessons for improving hypertension management across the region.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the role of community health initiatives and public health programs. These programs can provide hypertension screening, education, and support services, particularly for underserved populations. Evaluating the presence and effectiveness of these initiatives within 20204 and across Washington State is important. Collaboration between primary care practices, community organizations, and public health agencies can create a more comprehensive and supportive environment for hypertension patients.

Analyzing the data on a granular level, considering factors like insurance coverage, socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity, is crucial to identify disparities in hypertension care. This requires examining data on blood pressure control rates, medication adherence, and access to care across different demographic groups. Identifying and addressing these disparities is essential for achieving health equity.

In conclusion, assessing hypertension management in ZIP Code 20204 and Washington State requires a multifaceted approach. Evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and identifying standout practices are all crucial components. A data-driven analysis, combined with qualitative insights, can provide a comprehensive understanding of the landscape. This analysis can inform strategies to improve access to care, enhance patient outcomes, and reduce the burden of hypertension.

For a visual representation of this data, including physician locations, access to care metrics, and demographic information, we invite you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a dynamic and insightful view of the healthcare landscape, allowing you to visualize the data and identify areas for improvement. Use CartoChrome to gain a deeper understanding of hypertension management in your area.