20319, Washington, District of Columbia Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20319 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20319 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20319. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 182 health care providers accessible to residents in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20319 & Primary Care Availability in Washington

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP code 20319, a specific geographic area, and examines the broader context of primary care availability in Washington state, with a focus on factors impacting hypertension care. We will assess the availability of physicians, the adoption of innovative practices, and the integration of mental health resources, ultimately aiming to provide a comprehensive ‘Hypertension Score’ perspective.

Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio in 20319 is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to appointment delays, reduced time spent with patients, and ultimately, less effective hypertension management. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility to care. This analysis would involve identifying the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and cardiologists practicing within the ZIP code and comparing it to the estimated population. Further, it would be necessary to account for the age distribution of the population, as hypertension prevalence increases with age, thereby influencing the demand for services.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Standout practices in 20319 would demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based hypertension management. This includes the consistent use of standardized protocols for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, and treatment. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, through education and shared decision-making, would receive higher scores. Furthermore, practices that offer comprehensive services, such as on-site pharmacies or laboratory testing, streamline the patient experience and enhance adherence to treatment plans.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to remotely monitor blood pressure, conduct virtual consultations, and provide medication refills can significantly improve hypertension control, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms, integrated them seamlessly into their workflows, and demonstrated positive patient outcomes would score favorably. This analysis would investigate the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of access for patients, and the integration of these services with existing electronic health records (EHRs).

The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and hinder treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within primary care practices is a key indicator of a comprehensive approach to hypertension management. Practices that offer on-site mental health professionals, integrate mental health screenings into routine check-ups, or have established referral pathways to mental health specialists would receive higher scores. This analysis would assess the availability of these resources, the integration of mental health services with hypertension care, and the level of collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health providers.

Primary care availability across Washington state presents a broader picture. Rural areas often face significant physician shortages, limiting access to care for residents. This analysis would examine the distribution of PCPs across the state, identifying areas with high and low physician-to-patient ratios. Furthermore, it would assess the impact of geographic disparities on hypertension management, considering factors such as travel time to appointments, access to specialty care, and the availability of community resources.

The state's healthcare infrastructure plays a crucial role. The presence of hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities influences the availability of resources for hypertension management. This analysis would evaluate the distribution of these facilities across Washington, focusing on their capacity to provide comprehensive hypertension care. Furthermore, it would assess the level of collaboration between different healthcare providers, such as primary care physicians, cardiologists, and pharmacists, to ensure coordinated and effective care.

Insurance coverage is another critical factor. The affordability of healthcare services, including medications and specialist consultations, directly impacts access to care and treatment adherence. This analysis would examine the rates of health insurance coverage across Washington, identifying disparities in access to care based on socioeconomic status and geographic location. Furthermore, it would assess the availability of financial assistance programs for patients struggling to afford their medications.

The adoption of innovative technologies and practices can improve hypertension management across Washington. This analysis would evaluate the use of remote patient monitoring devices, mobile health applications, and other technologies to track blood pressure, provide medication reminders, and promote lifestyle changes. Furthermore, it would assess the implementation of population health management strategies, such as patient registries and targeted interventions, to identify and manage patients at risk of hypertension.

The role of public health initiatives is also significant. State and local health departments can implement programs to raise awareness about hypertension, promote healthy lifestyles, and provide access to resources for patients. This analysis would evaluate the effectiveness of these initiatives, assessing their impact on hypertension prevalence, control rates, and patient outcomes. Furthermore, it would assess the level of collaboration between public health agencies and healthcare providers to ensure a coordinated and comprehensive approach to hypertension management.

In conclusion, assessing the ‘Hypertension Score’ for 20319 and Washington requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves evaluating physician availability, the adoption of innovative practices, the integration of mental health resources, and the broader healthcare infrastructure. A comprehensive analysis would reveal strengths and weaknesses in the current system, enabling targeted interventions to improve hypertension management and patient outcomes.

To visualize these complex data points and gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and patient outcomes, we encourage you to explore the power of spatial analysis.

**Click here to explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome, allowing you to visualize the data and gain valuable insights into the landscape of hypertension care in 20319 and across Washington state.**