The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 30125, Cedartown, Georgia is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 79.22 percent of the residents in 30125 has some form of health insurance. 37.53 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.35 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30125 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,386 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30125. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,573 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,743 health care providers accessible to residents in 30125, Cedartown, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30125, Cedartown, Georgia
Hypertension Score | 12 |
---|---|
People Score | 8 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 57 |
30125 | Cedartown | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on hypertension management for primary care physicians within the 30125 ZIP code, encompassing Cedartown, Georgia, and evaluates the availability of primary care resources within the same geographic area. A "Hypertension Score" is constructed, considering factors crucial for effective patient care and control of high blood pressure. This score is not a single numerical value, but a composite of several metrics.
The first component of the Hypertension Score considers the physician-to-patient ratio within the 30125 ZIP code. A lower ratio, indicating fewer patients per physician, generally allows for more individualized attention and potentially better management of chronic conditions like hypertension. The analysis investigates the average patient panel size for primary care physicians in Cedartown. Data from insurance providers, local hospital systems, and publicly available sources like the Georgia Composite Medical Board are utilized to estimate these ratios. Areas with higher physician density, or lower patient-to-physician ratios, receive a higher score in this category. The presence of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who can also provide primary care services, is factored into the equation, as they can alleviate some of the burden on physicians.
The second critical factor is the availability of primary care appointments. This is measured by the average wait time for new patient appointments and follow-up visits. Shorter wait times facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment, which are essential for hypertension management. Data is gathered through phone calls to local practices, online appointment scheduling systems (where available), and patient feedback surveys. Practices with shorter wait times and readily available appointment slots receive a higher score. This component also assesses the ease of access, including evening and weekend hours, which can accommodate patients' schedules and improve adherence to treatment plans.
Another significant aspect of the Hypertension Score evaluates the adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in Cedartown. Telemedicine offers several advantages for hypertension management, including remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine platforms, offering virtual visits, and integrating remote monitoring devices receive a higher score. The analysis examines the types of telemedicine platforms used, the frequency of virtual visits, and the integration of data from home blood pressure monitors.
The fourth component considers the integration of mental health resources. Hypertension is often linked to stress and anxiety, and addressing these issues is crucial for effective blood pressure control. The analysis assesses the availability of on-site mental health professionals, referrals to local therapists and psychiatrists, and the use of screening tools for depression and anxiety. Practices with robust mental health support systems receive a higher score. This includes examining the presence of integrated behavioral health services, which can improve patient outcomes.
The fifth factor focuses on patient education and support. Effective hypertension management requires patients to understand their condition, medications, and lifestyle modifications. The analysis assesses the availability of patient education materials, group classes, and support programs. Practices that provide comprehensive patient education, including resources on diet, exercise, and stress management, receive a higher score. This also includes evaluating the use of patient portals and other tools that empower patients to actively manage their health.
The sixth component assesses the quality of care through the use of evidence-based guidelines and performance metrics. This includes an examination of the practices' adherence to national guidelines for hypertension management, such as those from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Practices that actively monitor patient outcomes, track blood pressure control rates, and participate in quality improvement initiatives receive a higher score. This can be assessed through publicly available data, if available, and through surveys of physicians.
Standout practices in Cedartown are identified based on their performance across these categories. These practices demonstrate excellence in hypertension management, offering a combination of low patient-to-physician ratios, easy appointment access, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, patient education, and adherence to guidelines. While specific practice names are withheld due to privacy considerations, the analysis highlights the key characteristics that contribute to their high scores. For example, a practice might be recognized for its innovative telemedicine program, its integrated behavioral health services, or its comprehensive patient education program.
The analysis also considers the overall primary care availability in Cedartown. This includes the number of primary care physicians, the types of practices (e.g., solo practices, group practices, hospital-affiliated practices), and the geographic distribution of these practices within the 30125 ZIP code. Areas with a higher density of primary care physicians and a more even distribution of practices receive a higher score in this category. The presence of urgent care clinics and other healthcare facilities is also factored into the assessment.
The final component of the Hypertension Score is the analysis of the availability of resources for underserved populations. This includes assessing the practices' acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, and their participation in programs that provide care to low-income individuals. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to serving all members of the community receive a higher score in this category. This also includes an examination of language services offered and the cultural competency of the healthcare providers.
In conclusion, the "Hypertension Score" analysis provides a comprehensive overview of hypertension management and primary care availability in Cedartown (30125). It considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, appointment access, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, patient education, adherence to guidelines, and resource availability. This analysis can be used to identify areas for improvement and to highlight best practices in hypertension management.
For a visual representation of the primary care landscape in Cedartown, including the geographic distribution of practices and patient demographics, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a valuable tool for understanding healthcare access and identifying potential disparities.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like