Hypertension Score

31012, Chester, Georgia Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 31012, Chester, Georgia

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 31012, Chester, Georgia is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 35.68 percent of the residents in 31012 has some form of health insurance. 14.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 27.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31012 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 263 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31012. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 155 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,246 health care providers accessible to residents in 31012, Chester, Georgia.

Health Scores in 31012, Chester, Georgia

Hypertension Score 51
People Score 34
Provider Score 75
Hospital Score 51
Travel Score 34

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

31012 Chester Georgia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 31012, Chester, Georgia

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 31012 and Primary Care in Chester

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP code 31012, focusing on the quality and accessibility of primary care services, with specific attention to Chester, Georgia. We will evaluate factors crucial for effective hypertension control, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all critical components of a holistic approach to cardiovascular health.

Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio in 31012 is a foundational step. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care physicians, can significantly hinder access to timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing monitoring for hypertension. This can lead to delayed interventions, poorer blood pressure control, and increased risk of cardiovascular complications. While precise figures fluctuate, a generally accepted benchmark suggests an ideal ratio of around 1 primary care physician per 1,500 patients. Local data, sourced from the Georgia Composite Medical Board and other relevant databases, needs to be analyzed to determine if the current ratio in 31012 meets this standard. If the ratio is unfavorable, it underscores the need for initiatives aimed at recruiting and retaining primary care physicians in the area.

Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is crucial. These practices often demonstrate exemplary performance in hypertension management. They may employ evidence-based guidelines, offer comprehensive patient education, and utilize innovative approaches to improve patient outcomes. Key indicators of a standout practice include high rates of blood pressure control, patient satisfaction scores, and adherence to national guidelines for hypertension treatment. Moreover, these practices might have implemented specialized programs, such as dedicated hypertension clinics or nurse-led interventions, to provide focused care. Furthermore, they might have strong partnerships with local pharmacies, specialists, and community organizations to ensure coordinated and comprehensive care.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management via telehealth can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Telemedicine can reduce the burden of travel, improve medication adherence, and facilitate more frequent monitoring of blood pressure. The level of telemedicine adoption among primary care practices in 31012 needs to be assessed. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointment scheduling, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the integration of telehealth platforms into the electronic health record systems. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are better positioned to provide convenient and accessible hypertension care.

The integration of mental health resources into primary care is equally important. Hypertension is often associated with stress, anxiety, and depression, which can negatively impact blood pressure control. Primary care practices that offer or have strong referral pathways to mental health services are better equipped to address the psychological factors that contribute to hypertension. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, who can provide counseling, therapy, and medication management. The availability of stress-reduction programs, such as mindfulness training or yoga classes, can further enhance the holistic approach to hypertension management.

The availability of these mental health resources in 31012 needs to be evaluated. This includes identifying the number of mental health providers in the area, the types of services offered, and the ease of access for patients. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their care models are better positioned to provide comprehensive and patient-centered hypertension management.

Furthermore, the analysis should examine the availability of other supportive resources, such as nutrition counseling, exercise programs, and patient education materials. These resources can empower patients to take an active role in managing their blood pressure and improving their overall health. The presence of community health centers, pharmacies, and other organizations that offer these services should be noted.

Analyzing the data collected from these various sources will provide a comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' for the primary care landscape in 31012. This score will reflect the quality and accessibility of hypertension care, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. This score can be used to identify areas for improvement, guide resource allocation, and inform the development of targeted interventions to enhance hypertension management in the community.

The analysis should also consider the demographic characteristics of the population served by primary care practices in 31012. This includes factors such as age, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage. Understanding these demographic factors is essential for tailoring interventions to meet the specific needs of the community. For example, practices serving a large population of older adults may need to focus on providing geriatric-specific care, while practices serving a low-income population may need to address barriers to access, such as transportation and medication costs.

Moreover, the analysis should consider the impact of social determinants of health on hypertension management. Social determinants of health are the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes, such as poverty, food insecurity, housing instability, and access to transportation. These factors can significantly impact a patient's ability to manage their blood pressure. Practices that are aware of these factors and have implemented strategies to address them are better positioned to improve patient outcomes. This might include partnering with community organizations to provide food assistance, housing support, and transportation services.

In conclusion, a thorough assessment of the primary care landscape in ZIP code 31012 is essential for understanding the quality and accessibility of hypertension care. This analysis should consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the impact of social determinants of health. By identifying areas for improvement and implementing targeted interventions, we can enhance hypertension management and improve the cardiovascular health of the community.

For a detailed, interactive map visualizing the primary care landscape in Chester and surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, explore the power of CartoChrome maps.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 31012, Chester, Georgia

You may also like

31019, Dexter, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 9.03 Miles

Total Population:

31014, Cochran, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 10.39 Miles

Total Population:

31009, Cadwell, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 10.43 Miles

Total Population:

31022, Dudley, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 10.65 Miles

Total Population:

31023, Eastman, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 13.86 Miles

Total Population:

31003, Allentown, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 14.16 Miles

Total Population:

31017, Danville, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 15.93 Miles

Total Population:

31021, Dublin, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 16.24 Miles

Total Population:

31011, Chauncey, Georgia
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 31012: 20.61 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 31012, Chester, Georgia