The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 31093, Warner Robins, Georgia is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 80.22 percent of the residents in 31093 has some form of health insurance. 42.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31093 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 7,000 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31093. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,273 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,945 health care providers accessible to residents in 31093, Warner Robins, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31093, Warner Robins, Georgia
Hypertension Score | 29 |
---|---|
People Score | 5 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 20 |
Travel Score | 63 |
31093 | Warner Robins | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis begins by establishing a Hypertension Score for primary care physicians within the 31093 ZIP code, encompassing Warner Robins, Georgia. This score, a composite measure, considers several critical factors influencing hypertension management. These include physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of advanced diagnostic tools, the integration of telemedicine, the presence of comprehensive mental health support, and the adoption of evidence-based treatment protocols. This approach allows for a nuanced understanding of the quality of care accessible to residents battling hypertension.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational element of the Hypertension Score. A lower ratio, signifying fewer patients per physician, typically allows for more individualized attention, more frequent check-ups, and improved patient education. In Warner Robins, the availability of primary care physicians is a key determinant. Areas with a higher concentration of physicians, particularly those accepting new patients, would receive a higher score in this category. The analysis would delve into the current physician-to-patient ratio within the 31093 ZIP code, comparing it to both regional and national averages to assess the relative accessibility of primary care.
Standout practices within Warner Robins, those demonstrating exemplary hypertension management, would be highlighted. This evaluation goes beyond simple patient volume, focusing on the implementation of best practices. This involves the consistent use of standardized blood pressure measurement protocols, the proactive identification of at-risk patients, and the aggressive management of hypertension through lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions. Practices employing certified diabetes educators or registered dietitians would receive positive consideration, as these professionals play a crucial role in patient education and self-management. The evaluation would also consider the availability of after-hours care and weekend appointments, crucial for patients needing urgent attention or those with demanding work schedules.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor. Telemedicine offers numerous advantages in hypertension management, including remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine platforms would receive a higher score. This includes the use of remote patient monitoring devices that transmit blood pressure readings directly to the physician, enabling proactive intervention and preventing complications. The analysis would assess the ease of access to telemedicine services, the availability of technical support for patients, and the integration of telemedicine data into the patient's electronic health record.
The integration of mental health resources is a crucial, often overlooked, aspect of hypertension management. Stress and anxiety are significant contributors to elevated blood pressure. Practices that provide access to mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, would receive a higher score. The analysis would assess the availability of mental health screenings, the integration of mental health treatment into the overall care plan, and the coordination between primary care physicians and mental health professionals. This holistic approach recognizes the interconnectedness of physical and mental well-being.
The analysis also focuses on the use of evidence-based treatment protocols. Practices adhering to the latest guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology would receive a higher score. This includes the consistent use of guideline-recommended medications, the regular monitoring of treatment effectiveness, and the proactive adjustment of medication regimens as needed. The analysis would examine the practice's commitment to patient education, including providing patients with information on lifestyle modifications, medication adherence, and the importance of regular follow-up appointments.
Primary care availability in Warner Robins is a significant aspect. The analysis would consider the geographic distribution of primary care practices within the 31093 ZIP code, identifying areas with limited access to care. This would include an assessment of the availability of transportation options for patients, particularly those with limited mobility or without access to personal vehicles. The analysis would also consider the availability of language services for non-English-speaking patients.
The overall Hypertension Score for each practice would be a weighted average of these factors. The weighting would reflect the relative importance of each factor in achieving optimal hypertension management. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio and the adoption of evidence-based treatment protocols would likely receive higher weightings than the availability of weekend appointments. The final score would be presented in a clear and concise manner, allowing patients to easily compare practices and make informed decisions about their healthcare.
The analysis would also consider the demographic characteristics of the population served by each practice. Practices serving a higher proportion of vulnerable populations, such as low-income individuals or those with limited access to healthcare, would be given extra consideration. This recognizes the unique challenges faced by these patients and the importance of providing culturally competent care.
The analysis would be conducted using publicly available data, including information from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Georgia Department of Public Health, and various healthcare directories. Data would be verified and cross-referenced to ensure accuracy. The analysis would be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
In conclusion, the Hypertension Score analysis provides a valuable tool for assessing the quality of primary care for hypertension management in Warner Robins. It highlights the importance of physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the use of evidence-based treatment protocols. The analysis empowers patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare and encourages practices to strive for excellence in hypertension management.
For a dynamic, visual representation of primary care availability and hypertension management resources in the 31093 ZIP code, including interactive maps and data visualizations, visit CartoChrome maps. Explore the data, understand the landscape, and make informed decisions about your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like