The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 31635, Lakeland, Georgia is 33 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 74.91 percent of the residents in 31635 has some form of health insurance. 35.90 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31635 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,731 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31635. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 873 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,898 health care providers accessible to residents in 31635, Lakeland, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31635, Lakeland, Georgia
Hypertension Score | 13 |
---|---|
People Score | 11 |
Provider Score | 33 |
Hospital Score | 24 |
Travel Score | 60 |
31635 | Lakeland | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The health landscape of Lakeland, Georgia, specifically within the 31635 ZIP code, requires careful scrutiny when assessing its capacity to manage hypertension. This analysis focuses on the availability of primary care physicians, their practices, and the resources they offer, all crucial factors in controlling and preventing this prevalent condition. We'll delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight exemplary practices, explore telemedicine integration, and assess the availability of mental health support, ultimately providing a nuanced understanding of the area's hypertension readiness.
Lakeland, a relatively small community, presents a unique challenge. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A higher ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially, inadequate management of chronic conditions like hypertension. Determining the exact ratio requires access to up-to-date, comprehensive data, including the number of practicing primary care physicians within the 31635 ZIP code and the total population. Publicly available sources like the US Census Bureau and state medical boards can offer some data, but the most precise assessment necessitates a deeper dive into healthcare provider directories and insurance network information. A low ratio would be concerning, potentially indicating a strained healthcare system.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. These include the adoption of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management, patient education programs, and the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for tracking patient progress. Practices that actively monitor blood pressure, provide personalized lifestyle recommendations, and offer regular follow-up appointments are likely to be more effective. Furthermore, practices that prioritize patient communication and offer convenient appointment scheduling are essential. The use of patient portals, allowing patients to access their medical information and communicate with their physicians, is another key indicator of a patient-centered approach. Assessing these aspects requires gathering information from various sources, including practice websites, patient reviews, and potentially, direct contact with the practices themselves.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in improving access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for in-person visits. This is especially valuable for hypertension management, as blood pressure readings can be monitored remotely, and medication adjustments can be made without requiring patients to travel. The extent to which practices in 31635 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered and the technology used, is a key consideration. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient education resources are likely to provide better care.
The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Stress, anxiety, and depression can all contribute to elevated blood pressure. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is crucial for comprehensive hypertension management. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, as well as support groups and educational programs. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referral services into their hypertension management programs are likely to provide more holistic care. Assessing the availability of these resources requires examining the practices' referral networks, the presence of on-site mental health professionals, and the availability of mental health services within the broader community.
Evaluating the overall effectiveness of hypertension management in 31635 necessitates a holistic approach. It is not enough to simply assess the availability of primary care physicians; we must also consider the quality of care provided, the integration of technology, and the availability of mental health resources. A comprehensive analysis would involve gathering data on various metrics, including patient outcomes, medication adherence rates, and the frequency of blood pressure control. However, such data is often difficult to obtain due to privacy concerns and the proprietary nature of healthcare information.
In the absence of comprehensive data, a qualitative assessment can still provide valuable insights. This involves gathering information from multiple sources, including practice websites, patient reviews, and community health reports. By synthesizing this information, we can develop a general understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in 31635. This assessment should also consider the unique challenges faced by the community, such as socioeconomic factors, access to healthy food options, and the prevalence of other chronic conditions.
The ability to map these healthcare resources and their relationships is crucial for understanding the landscape. CartoChrome Maps allows for the visualization of this data, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the access to care within the 31635 ZIP code. By visualizing the location of primary care physicians, the availability of telemedicine services, and the proximity of mental health resources, CartoChrome Maps can help identify areas where access to care is limited and where resources need to be allocated. This type of mapping can also highlight potential disparities in access to care based on geographic location or socioeconomic factors.
In conclusion, assessing the hypertension readiness of the healthcare system in Lakeland, Georgia, requires a multi-faceted approach. While specific data on physician-to-patient ratios, practice performance, and patient outcomes is essential, a thorough evaluation also considers the integration of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the unique challenges faced by the community. By leveraging the power of data visualization, such as that provided by CartoChrome Maps, we can gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and identify opportunities to improve access to care and promote better health outcomes for the residents of 31635.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like